Which ancient history was overestimated?

Which ancient history was overestimated?

Attached: 221_1234445463_2033-vert.jpg (300x1152, 339K)

Other urls found in this thread:

enotes.com/homework-help/did-christopher-columbus-know-that-he-didnt-273731
youtube.com/watch?v=WaLRMq8sgYM
youtube.com/watch?v=mE6Fy1s0pfU
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramayana:_The_Legend_of_Prince_Rama
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeology_of_Igbo-Ukwu
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Frobenius
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Head_from_Ife
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritime_history_of_Somalia
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajuran_Sultanate
twitter.com/AnonBabble

nordic

nordic

How?

Vikings were less of a civilization and more of a powerful band of barbarians.

Nordic

Because your Gods are almost as known as Greek Gods.

1, Vikings aren't ancient nordic history. Its vendels.
2, Define barbarians

what does mythology have to do with history?

Egypt
Completely overhyped
Non-romans

Nordic obviously, and Chinese as well : all the hipsters who want to convince you that Europe isn't the place where History happens always go crazy over China, but it's plain shit.

On the other side, I'd say that the Etruscan civilization is severely underestimated.