Is there a reason why africans talk in a weird English accent...

honestly british accent sounds retarded too
I can understand anyone who talks in english besides actual brits

They sound normal to me as long as they're not american

Because of american education

Have you heard the Italian accent in English ?

Whats you sayin bruv? Tha mandem speak is peng!

its not tehe result of being ill educated, you fucking moron.

It's the same in French, they have a weird accent like that:

youtube.com/watch?v=QCjOBuczwhw

What is the evolutionary purpose of these extremely large nostrils

braaap....

It's because of race and IQ, not even being racist here. Just the truth.
African-American dialect is the best you dolt.
youtube.com/watch?v=hOb_qjyYWFs

Their mother thounge isn't english so they speak it in their mother thounge's rythm. There's a reason for accents.

American blacks' mother tongue is English though and they continue to have a different accent. There are definetly biological reasons for this.

First of all, not all american blacks speak bionics. Adopted ones are an example.
American blacks speak bioniocs because they're raised with it, just like their parents and so one because of the segregation.
If you place a white american and have them grow up in the hood and only hang out with blacks, he'll start talking bionics too.
No biological reason for it at all. Just a good example in how language evolves.

Our Surinamese and Carib niggers also have funny accents.

youtube.com/watch?v=JqHrKI0DnXI

youtube.com/watch?v=EBuzi01DR8w

youtube.com/watch?v=ZUJJdeByJa0&

Attached: 1516135144603.jpg (600x445, 40K)

Genetics. They're too dumb to advance beyond toddler tier langauge complexity.

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-08-05 14:31:42.png (439x354, 101K)

>First of all, not all American blacks speak bionics
It's called ebonics.
>because of segregation
You mean pre-1965 where blacks were forcefully seperated from white society and formed their own culture distinct from white America? That's basically what I was talking about. Culture is large in part due to genetics. It's kind of like a chicken and an egg thing. Genetics form culture and culture affects genetics.
>If you place a white american and have them grow up in the hood and only hang out with blacks, he'll start talking bionics too
Well no shit, he is a small exception to a unified demographic with their own identity and culture.
>No biological reason for it all
Why is not controversial to say that dolphins and chimpanzees have different cultures and ways of communication due to them being different species, but it is when you acknowledge that different races have unique cultures from having contact with their own people who formed over thousands of years of natural and sexual selection?

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-08-05 14:33:33.png (667x514, 273K)

>bionics

Attached: 1531939715936.jpg (245x216, 13K)

love ainsley. he's so kind and well spoken

>No biological reason for it at all.
Meanwhile you're saying language is like a biological entity:
> Just a good example in how language evolves.
This is a modern retarded attitude towards language. Language is not a biological entity encoded by genes. It's a human tool and in the hands of niggers it rots, just like everything around them.

Afrikaans. This kills the English speaker.

youtube.com/watch?v=z2UdJhqVsc8

Are White South Africans literally retarded?

Short answer: yes
Long answer: yeah

He looks quite jewish. Must be all that free air.

i like the ludicrous interpretation of lingustics by racists itt. reminds me of stuff like soviet biology.

>dolphins and chimpanzees
Dolphins and chimps are seperate species, whereas black people are people. It’s “controversial” because about all the time someone tries to talk about how blacks are different and need to be separated it comes from a place of hate. Segregation fails everywhere it has been implemented.

Segregation worked quite well in the Netherlands.

Green = protestants
Red = catholics

Attached: Religion_Netherlands.png (800x948, 140K)

>Segregation fails everywhere it has been implemented.
I agree with everything else in your post but this bit just isn't true. Most of human history is segregation.

And most of human history is a tale of barbaric and hateful genocide after genocide.

Good borders make cultural or racial conflicts a lot less likely.

your point? committing genocide is the opposite of failure from a purely pragmatic and amoral point of view. besides, like said, good borders (basically a form of segregation) prevent these things from happening

>committing genocide is the opposite of failure from a purely pragmatic and amoral point of view.

t. unaligned AI

>pragmatic
Really don’t see how genocide has ever been pragmatic, it’s always been worse than diplomacy
>muh borders
Borders didn’t stop nazis did they? Neither did appeasement. It’s almost as if systemic racism leads to awful foreign policy... hmm I wonder if we can apply this lesson to modern nations

>the british accent

Attached: 1495985107268.png (638x359, 247K)

So has been almost every fucking species on this Earth for 4.5 billion years. Mammals, reptiles, birds, fish, mollusks, insects, arachnids, plants, bacteria, any where there is DNA there is violence, murder, survival, and reproduction. The only thing that matters is the future of OUR species. No one gives a fuck about clownfish that swim in our waters, or the buffalos roaming our plains. They're only use is to feed us or entertain us. And eventually, after a couple million years, races can form their own species that are entirely different from primitive races that have failed to evolve. Notice how in every evolutionary chart, whites are seen as the most evolved form of man (we discovered evolution after all). We have an advantage no other race on this planet has. We have intelligence and we have empathy. These are two qualities that 99.999999999% of species on Earth do not have. And you cannot refute because you know it's true, you just don't because you envy the superiority of whites and our accomplishments while your ancestors were living in mud huts and consuming each other. You will always remain a primitive being so it is best not to breed and fap to white women for the rest of your life. Please get a vasectomy.

Attached: dna to human.png (1280x1408, 1.89M)

>So has been almost every fucking species on this Earth for 4.5 billion years.
So we should stick to barbarism because that's how it was done for millions of years? fuck that I like living in cities under rule of law nations. You can go live in the bush if you like you caveman
>Notice how in every evolutionary chart, whites are seen as the most evolved form of man
I don't notice that at all. In fact, you clearly don't understand evolution at all if you think something can be "more evolved" than something else.

Genocide is a form of prevention. It prevents future conflicts and (bureaucratic) burdens.

>Borders didn’t stop nazis did they
But the Nazi's didn't invade The Netherlands or France because they hated our race. Or because they wanted to get rid of our jews. They just wanted to increase their power and influence. The same goes for Napoleon. Those were exactly the people who didn't acknowledge borders. The communists also didn't acknowledge borders. The Islam doesn't acknowledge borders. Hell, even the EU doesn't acknowledge borders. And it leads to all kinds of tensions.

"Workers of the world, unite"

>Genocide is a form of prevention. It prevents future conflicts and (bureaucratic) burdens.
genocide actually doesn't prevent future conflicts is usually provides the impetus for more conflict. History is filled with examples of 2 facial or cultural groups despising one another for larger and larger attacks. The only winning move is diplomacy.
>But the Nazi's didn't invade The Netherlands or France because they hated our race.
it was part of the reasoning.
>we are pure and the ownership of the world is our right

Why does the individual at the bottom right of the pic have white skin and long hair? Why isn't it a black African or an aboriginal?

In that case half of England is clinically retarded.

because you cherry picked the image? lmao if I photoshop a black guy on the end would it change your opinion?
>We have intelligence and we have empathy.
Where is your empathy for fellow members of your species?

>fellas of destruction
based

We are "more pure" than Germans, who are a mutts of slavs, celts and germanics. They knew that as well.

>we are pure and the ownership of the world is our right
That's not how it works. Their ideology was more in line with the evolution theory. That all races (and lifeforms) were already at war, as that's the natural state of all different races. Even when you peacefully coexist. They only started actively participating in the already ongoing war.

But they didn't acknowledge borders because they found race more important than nationalism. Just like some people find the working class or religion more important than the sovereignty of nations.

Those ideas were strengthened by the penalties on Germany. The evolution and Nietzsche-ish ideas only strengthened the idea that they were already in conflict.

>We are "more pure" than Germans,
you need to abandon this mindset. The tree of human history makes "mutts" of us all, we are all related, we can all (barring rare genetic or environmental issues) breed. By the way, this doesn't mean we have to abandon cultures of regions.

I don't consider different races "one of us". I don't give a fuck about niggers, spics, chinks, poos, a mudslimes. If it was up to me, I would genocide them all. Subspecies is even more important than species. It's very clear that races are distinct subspecies in the same species. The problem with this, humans aren't distant enough to experience outbreeding depression from miscegenation. This inclines European females to seek out more masculine blacks, Amerindians, arabs, diluting my race's blood.
Unrelated, but it's 9 times out of 10 for mammals that males of the species have to take control of the female while they seek out and provide for their tribe of nation. Females are primates aren't usually as aggressive as the males since they lack testosterone and have smaller frontal lobes (which correlates to personality and emotions). Females may seem more "emotionally" but it's really because estrogen makes it difficult for them to control their emotions. Males have bigger amydgala which helps them sense emotion better and makes them more reactive to stress and anger, but in a good way.
You should really focus on preserving racial hygiene and male supremacy. It's the only way for our species to evolve further and much faster.

Attached: human brain.png (1200x881, 1.52M)

>You should really focus on preserving racial hygiene and male supremacy. It's the only way for our species to evolve further and much faster.
This is false and the success of multicultural modern nations like mine and yours proves it better than any argument I can make with words. Racial division in practice and philosophy has always made things worse. You seek genocides of everyone who looks different than you. How would this make the world a better place? It would make it a war ruined desert. It is through unity and diplomacy that society will advance.

He made a typo you dense cunt

>the success
You have got to be fucking retarded. Just look at any major city in American with a high black population and guess what do you get?
>Racial division in practice and philosophy has always made things worse.
"Worse" how exactly?
>How would this make the world a better place
I am not talking about the "world". I am talking about our species.
>It would make it a war ruined desert
There are ways to practice genocide without war or destruction of the environment, we have methods of sterilization and quarantine. The Nazis tried this and we can do it again.

Attached: 1522278893678.jpg (960x1034, 87K)

I know we are all related. And races are merely ideals on a sliding scale. But I do believe good borders are more important than anything.

Within the Netherlands you also notice that people from our colonies (Caribbean, Surinamese, Indonesian) are more accepted than people who aren't from our colonies (Moroccans, Turks, Chinese). And people from related cultures (Germans, Belgians) integrate better than people from distant cultures (Poles, Bulgarians). That's also why I believe encouraging open borders is harmful to society.

In all countries that are truly multicultural there are racial conflicts, from the USA to China. And natural segregation. And in countries that are now experiencing multicultural migration in Europe you see a white flight happening in areas where migrants move to.

t. brainlets

maybe whites shouldn't have rioted and destroyed prospering black towns circa 1920s.

>genocide superior beings
People who are against the greater good have no say to these matters.

Europeans have to get mongrelized before getting wiped out of the earth's surface.

>Spain in charge of anything

Attached: p01gmy69.jpg (640x360, 72K)

Jow Forums - pseudoscience and memes

qt not like brits one

>Just look at any major city in American with a high black population and guess what do you get?
Poor neighborhoods always have high crime rates. Fix the education issues of inner cities and remove the war on drugs and you will see those crime numbers drop.
>"Worse" how exactly?
Nazis and the Japanese empire were ethnonational countries. They viewed themselves as pure and strong, so naturally they wanted to take over the world. They LOST to a coalition of "mongrel" nations who valued peace and the value of human beings regardless of their race. Same for the American Confederacy. Apartheid in South Africa failed and was awful for minorities. African colonialism led to the genocide of Rwanda (which by the way is a great example showing that humans can be racist against one another over the smallest most retarded things)
>I am not talking about the "world". I am talking about our species
So am I. Lets make a better world for our species.
>There are ways to practice genocide without war or destruction of the environment... The Nazis tried this
You will lose if you try this. I will fight you. So will the righteous people and nations across the globe. There is no way to practice your genocide.

I also agree that borders are important, as is the sovereignty of nations and the notion of a state sanctioned citizen. They all go hand in hand.

Posts like this are no good either. They serve as fear bait for racial hatred.

Funny how some features of "ebonics" like passive voice (like "be tellin" )and double negation (I ain't got no) are actually more typical for more complex languages than English like Slavic ones.

Racist mutts need to be shot desu. If you believed them blacks are literally monkeys even through they have the same unemployment rate in the US as white Slovaks in Slovakia. American racist autists don't realize how good blacks are, they have a fucking 13 percent unemployment rate and Western European incomes, our gypsies have 80 percent unemployment and incomes of Tajikistan and nobody spergs over them so much.

thinking is too hard for them so they resort to tribalism - which just so happens to make them feel superior, funny that

>nobody spergs over them so much
They do and they would more if they could desu. I'd say if human rights were off for a while or we had a purge day the only thing saving gypsies from total annihilation would be slovaks' passivity and christian values.

I don't care about races, I just can't stand ebonics and thug culture.
>ay nigga was poppin blood was crackin im deadass nigga aint no shiet comin round here juheard??