>Europoors can't afford a house in the suburbs
Europoors can't afford a house in the suburbs
But in Europe the suburbs are the ghetto it's downtown that's rich, opposite of you
Why the fuck would anyone want to live in the suburbs?
true serb way is just living in the sewers, owning houses is for first worlder richfags
American suburbs are absolute garbage and anyone who unironically likes them should feel bad.
>he worke his life to live in a cardboard box
Outside of USA, housing is more expensive near the commercial centre and that's where white people live. Meanwhile Jews (who invented american cardboard suburbs) installed blacks in your "inner cities" and chased away whites from prime real estate.
A cardboard box he pays rent and property taxes even after "owning" it.
i am actually pretty glad that i live in the suburbs, the only downside is that you have to take the train to central Athens and that takes about half an hour
Esto
Not that bad desu
They was invented by Jews.
Seriously though, are suburbs actually more expensive than living in the downtown in the US?
The Jew swindles again
No, but downtown I assume is only for rich people
the city is called Kifissia, you should check it out on google maps it looks really comfy
They were*
Hol up. Let me draw you a diagram....
So you got downtown which is for rich people, suburbs which are also apparently for rich but not so rich people and inner cities which are somewhere between downtown and suburbs which are for poor people?
Downtown (like condos and shit) = Rich
Suburbs = Rich / Upper Middle Class / Middle Class
Inner City (between downtown and suburbs) = Working class or Poors
Welcome to America.
>he buys property in the countryside where rent is dirt cheap
No wonder americans all have debt
The wealthiest suburbs are the ones closest to downtown. The ones further out are newer and cheaper and usually considered nouveau riche (they're the mcmansions that people always post)
The big trend now is to build new housing near the downtown, and renovate old buildings downtown (called a "loft" in the US). But all that's expensive housing too.
There's always nice "suburban" sort of neighborhoods in the city proper, but they're only for wealthy people who can send their kids to private school. Prettymuch no middle-class people live in the city proper.
But almost everyone here lives in suburbs
Even though the "inner city" often has the most beautiful large brick buildings which here in Toronto are the most expensive and occupied by whites more often than not. In the greater toronto area, the suburban cities like Brampton, Mississauga, Markham are were poos and Chinese live. The mid-town "inner city" is often where rich whites live and the downtown condos is where chinks and whites live in shoeboxes.
This whole situation is so weird. How does it affect the crime in the city, and in what ways would the crime be different if the cities had been like most European cities (i.e. no poor suburbs between rich middle class suburbs and downtown)
Here's Chicago as an example. And you can compare it with where the shootings occur:
data.cityofchicago.org
>Paying ever increasing rent to someone instead of investing in your own property.
Top pleb.
It actually increases crime in the city because, in places with more middle-income people walking around there's less crime (called "eyes on the street"). Western Europe has a shitton less crime than here because you can't just break into a house where everyone can see you.
The mixture of uses in a city keeps it safe. That's why "gentrified" areas in American cities are always industrial neighborhoods: shipping centers and factories nearby keep the neighborhood safe, and because it's downtown it's also convenient.
>Not living in the boonies where you can do whatever the fuck you want without any neighbors to call the cops on you
Crime occurs where the non whites (poors) are. So, the inner city.
That’s why living inside of an American city sucks unless you can afford to live in the ivory towers in the absolute center of a city and be surrounded by banks, businesses, etc
Kind of fucked up that the middle class has to move away from the inner city to escape the crime. Longer commute hours, access to public facilities etc, kind of sucks for them
The suburbs are unironically trash.
Most people here love living in the suburbs. It’s quieter, and a better place to raise your family.
America also isn’t big on “public facilities”. Although I’m not sure what you mean by that exactly anyway. Suburbs have their own stores and restaurants and stuff so it’s not like I have to ever go to the city unless it’s for work or to go to a government building.
Only thing shitty about the suburbs is the commute to and from work really.
Exactly! Not to mention the "inner city" houses are often beautiful brick houses.
I don't unanimously hate suburbs, some are really nice.
But I hate that we've built so much endless suburbia and not thought about the resource strain it would cause us.
New houses get built in the city here and they're really nice, but they're all like $700k and get bought up immediately.
our looks like this
Really interesting.
Can other Euros post suburbs in their country?
Russia tier
Who did this?
kek Is that a gypsy camp?
Paris follows natural laws of real estate. The lumpenproletariat lives on the outskirts where real estate is cheapest. In USA, lumpenproletariat was installed in the mid-town "inner city" (en.wikipedia.org
maybe ? i have no idea, some nigger camps look like this as well
it's like your standard favela with sheet metal houses like in brazil
i can find a shitton of pics like this from here
i'm pretty sure this one was full gypsy, it's a slum that goes all over the old train tracks
They want to live like that, it's their way of life
why people want them to change so much; they love caravans and being nomad
That's actually kinda neat. I'm sure it'd be horrible to actually live even remotely near, though.
it's not like they do it in the middle of nowhere though, they do it inside an already inhabited place then they steal from the people around, if the gypsy camps were all the way in the wilderness nobody would care
that being said here they do it in a ghetto so nobody cares either
>he wants to live in the suburbs
Mentally challanged burger, life in a small town is strictly superior to some big city shithole.
I live in a suburb 1 mile next to a small town , it's peak comfiness
Well their conception of private propriety has always been a bit different, but they aren't intrinsically bad people, just a bit backward.
Still, they live everywhere in Europe since 5 centuries, they're not just some foreigners coming to take land
Considering how much persecution they faced in the last centuries (including Nazi genocide) for no reason, they deserve at least a part of what jew and israeli got as reparation.
>american houses are built in wood and are destroyed each couple of years because of natural disasters
lmao
i always thought this one looked particularly shit
actually if you want to delve into the topic there is a distinction to be made between our gitans that have been here for a few generations, usually speak french, live in trailer parks and are not as bad as the more recently arrived roms that live in favelas
but yeah sure i'd rather pay so they go somewhere else rather than subsidize israel, ideally i wouldn't give my tax money at all to anybody though i feel like i've given enough already ty