ITT: "Villains" from other countries that did nothing wrong
Hard mode: No dictators
ITT: "Villains" from other countries that did nothing wrong
Hard mode: No dictators
>Captain Human Rights and Democracy
>as he drank North Korea, Cuba, and Libya's cum
didn't he own a peanut farm or something
I believe he's a genuinely good person, just he was a horrible president
carter was a retard who pussed out over iran
inb4 pinoshit (inb4 choroy)
Every single crisis the UK has now is a direct result of her policies. Housing in particular being the most egregious one.
>You can pinpoint the second when the UK becomes a geopolitical joke
why is she so revered if anyone says they hate her, is it because she's hated that she is revered? i don't get her
only based boer ever
>inb4 pinoshit
>Hard mode: No dictators
Yep. Before he was president he was a peanut farmer in Georgia.
>horrible president
>the one who oversaw zero war crimes, governments toppled, nations destroyed, or human rights violations
His administration was the single point during the cold war where USA could actually truthfully claim moral superiority over the USSR.
But sure, fuck him.
Carter and Nixon both get too much hate. LBJ, Reagan and Clinton way too little.
Two in one.
Why do Anglos hate the British Reagan?
that makes him weak in the eyes of americans
>LBJ
>too little
It seems to me like he gets crucified for the fuckups of everyone after Truman.
HCM was so based
some people here argue that pinoshit wasn't a dictator...
Because he was never brought to trial and convicted?
>governments toppled
Excluding of course the trivially unimportant events in Iran?
At least no real people died because of him, just commies.
Didn’t he purge most of his former political allies and had most “disappear”
>just commies
Mhm, sure. And those three million people killed in Indonesia? Card carrying communists, every one!
If only our alliance had lasted until WW1
>France is forever cucked
>The British Empire is dismantled
>Peace in EUrope means that RUssia can focus more on the east and avenge 1905
A perfect world
Not our fault. The Indonesian army kind of went hellofamonkey. I mean, it was the Third World. What did you expect?
Let me give my reasoning.
>Britain was unprepared for war when Hitler started becoming aggressive
>Prolonged conflict fro Britain to prepare
>Made an agreement to protect Poland (he made it, not Churchill)
>If it wasn’t Hitler to declare war, most of Britain wouldn’t fight
>British army was much more prepared for war during the invasion of Poland than it originally was
>>If it wasn’t Hitler to declare war, most of Britain wouldn’t fight
He didn't though?
It was Britain and France that declared war on Germany.
Sure, I'm not saying the US was responsible (though it certainly wasn't guilt-free). My point was just that to say Pinochet killed no one who wasn't a communist is as stupid as saying Suharto only killed communists. In both cases the mass murders were messily carried out by idiots, killed on the weakest of suspicion, and was hardly ever so clear-cut as to only affect one group of people.
Anyone who does not actively support the physical destruction of communist bodies might as well be a communist.
Do you know how many cuban/russian agents were present in Chile during Allende's governments? Thousands. Many of the political killings were pretty fucking obvious. I guess the left realy swallowed the propaganda of CIA backed brutes killing countless innocent moderates randomly.
During our dictatorship only a few hundred were killed even though our population is much greater, because the number of USSR/Cuban/international socialist interference was much midler.
The invasion of Poland made Hitler a complete aggressor, plus Germany was now invading a country which didn’t just lay down and take it up the ass
The US State Department wanted Allende gone, but they didn't really want Pinochet's dictatorship either and support from Washington came rather grudgingly. The Reagan Administration gradually pressured him to step down from power and so he finally did at the end of the 80s.
>killed on the weakest of suspicion
The should be the bar when dealing with communists. It should be even lower when dealing with anarchists.
Several other dictators like Ceausescu, Mobutu, and Suharto were also steadily discarded by Washington as the Cold War wound down. Taiwan and South Korea were also pressured to democratize.
This has little to do with what I said. The necessity to murder a great number of the opposition came because the opposition was actually very organized and highly recognizeable in Chile at the time. The US also supported The Brazilian army and it went away around the same time, but it needed to kill only a fraction of what the Chileans had to to keep the armed resistence at bay, because the armed resistence here was much weaker. Allende's government was a puppet to the USSR/Cuba and was already highly compromised by the time the americans interfered.
you took the words out of my mouth
I remember watching a documentary about how the USSR basically discarded Allende far before the beginning stages of the coup. The documentary basically talked about how the Soviets considered him weak-willed and a coup “inevitable”
Allende almost crashed the economy with no survivors when he had the genius idea to carry out a large scale wealth redistribution program to the poor of Chile at a time when copper prices were low and the country was struggling economically.
Also he won only 30% of the vote in the 1970 presidential election and became president entirely because of the retarded Chilean electoral system.
holy shit this
>discarted Allende
Sure they did. Even if that was the case, the number of other Latin american socialists congregating in Chile at the time was something unprecedented. A lot of socialists really believed in Chile as a revolutionary alternative. The intervention was as inevitable as a communist coup attempt if it didn't happen.
Fucking this. Unironically.
Just shut the fuck up.
Less well know than Allende was Peru's Juan Alvarado, another leftist "genius" who decided to nationalize everything during an economic recession (same issue with low copper prices) and also spent a shitton of money buying weapons from the Soviet Union for a war against Chile to avenge the War of the Pacific a century earlier. Thankfully the army deposed him before it was too late.
Did he hurt your feelings? Honestly, unironic militant anarchofaggots really are asking for a bullet. No one else likes them.
And yes, Allende did have Cuban advisers.
Pinochet did nothing wrong and the only people who hate him are commies.
this, pic related was too soft on them. should have gassed them to make hitler look a bit better tbqh
Did no wrong and his death is the greatest tragedy second only to Hitler
Nicholas II had an IQ of about 80 and he was high on different drugs a lot of the time. I mean, read his diary. It's just vacuous shit about palace balls and walks in the garden.
t. david goldman, Harvard 2020
Anarchism is like a social leprosy. Anyone who spends even a short amount of time near an anarchist is contaminated. The presence of an anarchist is a perfectly fine justification for destroying entire towns.
Imagine if Hitler and Nicholas II lived at the same time. Hitler might have been nicer as well. Hitler and Nicholas BFF's is like the best timeline.
This is sounding edgier than any anarchist I have ever read about, and I read about John Brown
The guy in that pic is more deserving of respect than the people who get off dreaming about slaughtering Spanish nuns en masse.
This man is feared by the commies
You can make fun of him, but from what I remember in UNI pic related is what your average anarchist looked like, except less healthy. They are the larpiest of leftists
When it comes down to it, it's probably less edgy than Hakim Bey, but even the most cartoonist forms of cruelty are not adequate enough punishment for the anarchist.
Honest to god
/our guy/ if there's ever been one.
You could argue that part of that was indifference a la Obama’s refusal to intervene in Syria back in ‘11, though I still think Carter did an admirable job overall.
It really speaks volumes when the devout christian, country boy rancher from down south whom spends his free time building houses for the poor and teaching sunday school loses significantly to a Hollywood movie star from California to the overall state of this country.
>we should nuke a town because one person in it has anarchist beliefs
>no dictators
He said no dictators you retarded monkey
You have to stop the plague somehow. Anarchists are like shells who have turned their back on the redemption that the state can provide. You can't have that sort of thing spreading.
Also, do you know what Hakim Bey would with a temporary autonomous zone if he had one?
>did no wrong
>his death is the greatest tragedy second only to Hitler
>guy that sucked off North Korea and called the election of Hamas in the West Bank in 2006 "a beautiful election"
Another commie moron who did unrealistic, unfeasible commieshit with no way to pay for it during the global recession in the 70s and got shitcanned for it.
He didn't puss out over shit, the Iranians absolutely hated his guts and stalled the release of the prisoners until after he was out of office to spite him and deny him the chance to say he was the one that successfully negotiated their release. Make absolutely no mistake, Carter set all of that train in motion, all Reagan did was step into the Oval Office and literally a day later the Iranians were like "You want prisoners back? Lol." Carter was a good man and gets shit on way more than he deserves.
>summer comes around
>board instantly flooded with underage MAGApedes from Jow Forumsthedonald and their masturbation fantasies about murdering their political opponents.
Meanwhile, real actual commies killed tens of millions. Mao Zedong singlehandedly caused the greatest famine in recorded history.
State rights aren't wrong
Story?
Wrong person, he was a general, not a leader
He was a social democrat, but everyone to the left of Trump is a “gommie” to the MAGApede.
>>board instantly flooded with underage MAGApedes from Jow Forumsthedonald and their masturbation fantasies about murdering their political opponents.
>implying I support Trump
I won't support any political figure that doesn't support the state-sponsored slaughter on anarchists. I definitely wouldn't support one that has let them coordinate riots with impunity the way he has.
Yeah but he's come to represent basically the entire south so good enough.
Are you a communist by any chance?
They have the same ideals, and are always willing to work together against the right. As far as their opposition is concerned the differences between them are trivial, academic nonsense.
>Whitlam is elected Australian PM in 1972
>instantly starts a program of gibesmedat, greater degree of centralized control over the economy, ending conscription, pulling out of Vietnam, apologizing to Abos for making them go to school and wearing pants, and gargling China's ballsack
>also guess what? it's a recession how do we pay for gibesmedat
>the Queen and the CIA plotted together to remove him from office
>thus given the greenlight, Australia's governor-general dismissed Whitlam from office in November 1975
Democratic Socialists are commies though
Let me guess, Bernie Sanders is a communist
Didn't he honeymoon in the Soviet Union or something?
Anything left of hitler is communism
Who is right of Hitler?
I’m pretty sure most people in the 60s and 70s knew at least one fuck who had some commie beliefs.
>implying (((hitler))) isn't a communist
huh, hello? National (((SOCIALISM))) (((?)))