>brutalism is ba
Brutalism is ba
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
-dass.
-sed
brutalism
I hope this turns into a 300 reply autistic architecture thread because they are unironically my favourite
Looks awful, m8.
This t b h.
-dum tsh
this
nothing better than to watch autists sperg over rocks
Comfy to say the least
>didn't collapse
what is this
I don't know but I like it a lot.
Brutalism is good. Very good.
First off, it's inexpensive, but that's not the only reason people choose to build in it. Even people with high budgets that could've afforded building something "better" stuck with it.
Why? It's not dishonest architecture. The rawness of it all has an unique appeal that is hard to pin down - it just looks so incredibly sturdy and reliable BECAUSE of its simplicity. There aren't any ornaments adorning the facade and the whole thing is generally-speaking, minimalist as fuck, although it doesn't have to be. There's something about it that stirs up my heart, a gush of nostalgia coursing throghout me every time I see a brutalist building.
Have you seen a brutalist building at nighttime? That's the tightest shit ever, and not because you don't see the building as well as you do during the daytime. Many warm lights peering through the otherwise dim and reflective windows, revealing the soft and gentle inside. I'm not even mentioning what happens when you go inside - you're enveloped in the cosiest atmosphere known to mankind. If it's a public building it can be spacious as fuck, and it won't feel imposing at all.
In a way, when done cheaply, it reminds me of the way IKEA do things - they strive for utmost efficiency while still being presentable as fuck; they always try to trim corners when they can, but with the sole exception being that brutalist buildings don't fall apart you sneeze at them.
A FPS map
beautiful
That looks like one of those old towers where they had all the phone lines coming out of it.
-siert
Fuck me that looks sturdy.
Ingsoc Headquarters
With traditional architecture, form follows function.
Modernist shit is unappealing and non-functional because it has a poor relationship with its surroundings.
they were
>we bomb a Christian nation's twin towers for Islamic interests
>Paid back in full by divine justice a few years later
Brutalism is based you cannot refute this
Who's "we" ??
Didn't save the reich though, now did it?
Beautiful
Brutalist isn’t bad, and retards who only appreciate one school of architecture should kill themselves. What shouldn’t happen, however, is mixing. Brutalist buildings should not be in old European city centers, and likewise, neoclassical buildings should not be built in Downtown Chicago.
the barbican (the complex in the pic) does a pretty good job of blending in and seems a really nice place to live (it has rainforesty gardens inside of it)
>neoclassical buildings should not be built in Downtown Chicago.
why not
Brutalism is boring af
There are some neat examples but brutalism has been largely rejected by architects and citizens
Don't know why soybrains are such big fans of it
>habitat 67
>brutalism
Belgrade
brutcucks get out
this is an
o r g a n i c
thread now
>300 replies
There was an architecture thread on /a/ that reached 660 not that long ago.
Wonder why the mods haven't set the bump limit here at 500 posts like it is there, there's plenty of possible discussion to be had on Jow Forums.
brutalism only good it its has loads of vegetation and trees
*look good
That is the Teresa Carreno Theater in Caracas, Venezuela.
ty user, been wondering that for a while
agreed. sometimes painting does the work too.
You know you can enter image URLs in Google Images and it'll do a reverse search and try to figure out the content from all the websites where the same picture is hosted, right?
yeah
last time i tried it was a long time ago and the results yielded nothing
>tower blocks
just build terraces noob