Innocent countries

>innocent countries
YEAH DESTABILISE 'EM
>innocent civilians
YEAH EXPERIMENT ON 'EM
>innocent leaders
YEAH ASSASSINATE 'EM

Attached: 6000.png (2000x1200, 169K)

Other urls found in this thread:

statisticalatlas.com/division/New-England/Race-and-Ethnicity
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>innocent russians
YEAH ACCUSE EM

It is unironically better to be invaded by the US army than to deal with CIA fucks

>Georgetown graduates
YEAH EMPLOY EM

I see you Xiang.

>implying that innocence is a possible condition for existing beings.

We're all guilty of something.

YEAH YEAH KILL EM YEAH

glow in the dark cia niggers need to leave

It is also better to be invaded by the US army than to open your economy to american companies. The american military is paradoxically their least destructive weapon.

>We're all guilty of something.
Of being a yank, in your case.

KILL EM ALL YEEAAAHHH

YEEEAH GUILT TRIP 'EM

If the CIA were really as smart and competent as Noam Chomsky thinks they are, we'd be in real trouble.

They just require internal cooperation and a mutual blood lust.

I always wondered why the CIA seemed nigh omnipotent with the ability to casually overthrow and control mid sized countries like it was nothing, when the military had to go through a lot of effort to pacify much lesser countries like Iraq. Then I learned that pretty much all those stories are bullshit and in every case the CIA did something like that they simply gave money or political support to a movement in the country that was already doing that on its own, and probably could have accomplished it without help. It's the standard "blame foreigners for all problems" excuse. Sometimes I do wish that we can just flip a switch and change the government of say Brazil whenever we want though.

innocence is literally a social construct tho

there exists no law of nature that entitles someone to a permanent peaceful state of existence
gravity doenst give a shit either way, electricity doesnt give a shit either way, there exists no reason not to hurt someone for material gain if they are unable to retaliate
if someone is unable to retaliate, he is a fair target
the only "sin" or "guilt" is therefore being weak

>example
if a bunch of brown undeveloped people with colorful feathers sticking out of their ears are sitting on a large deposit of copper or oil, it makes perfect sense for cia to "help" them be more "democratic"

cia has more employees than your army
its just that they are not all willing and that they are not all citizens
if you kidnap someone or threaten or hook him up on drugs or whatever, bribe him, spy on him, he is an employee of some sort

>nigh

Attached: tip.jpg (679x571, 37K)

I have to unironically thank the CIA for stopping communism in this country.

Attached: 715B5F7F-1AFD-4434-AB9D-DDF818A5CFD4.jpg (340x312, 40K)

>t. Unintelligent Psychopath
Opinion discarded

Gang Gang

Attached: 1526249945514.gif (554x400, 120K)

bait

The US army just exists to get rid of all that expensive ammunition that's lying around so they can order more next quarter.

They're surprisingly more incompetent than you think. For example, hundreds of failed attempts to kill Fidel Castro and they didn't even detect Saddam's invasion of Kuwait.

I mean, Jesus Christ, during the Bay of Pigs invasion they didn't even know the exact geographical dimensions of Cuba and thought the island was smaller than it was. And this was a place 90 miles from the US, not on the other side of the world.

Turn off the proxy, Cletus.

They're ambitious but when it comes to doing some things they're laughably incompetent.

>and in every case the CIA did something like that they simply gave money or political support to a movement in the country that was already doing that on its own, and probably could have accomplished it without help.
Thank you. The Chilean coup was mostly the army's doing and even though the US State Department was happy to have Allende gone, they weren't too pleased with Pinochet's dictatorship and supported him only begrudgingly. The Reagan Administration pressured him to step down and finally he did at the end of the 80s.

How white is the US if you remove new England? Because they're majority white.

Attached: 1514213987320.jpg (1024x545, 74K)

Who cares about non white countries?

Overall it depends on the standards you're using. 1940 census standards considered Hispanics as white by default, so by that standard the country would be about 80% white or so today. By today's standards (having separate categories for mixed-race people including mixed-race Hispanics) we're 72% white overall. I don't know what we'd be without New England though.

why classify nonwhites as whites tho? how is that helpful?

Attached: usa white.jpg (1580x3431, 927K)

People often take maps from 1940 of white population percentage by county and juxtapose them with maps from the past several years, claiming that whites are disappearing. It's important to take into account methodology when making such claims.

In 2008 78~% of people in New England were white of non Hispanic origin.
And according to statisticalatlas.com/division/New-England/Race-and-Ethnicity
It's 78.5%
Not including mixed and Hispanics.
So that's way above average for the US. Taking them off would remove 11.5 million white people which is 3.5% of 325 million (overall registered population in 2016)

Did you ask Iraqis?

Pot calling the kettle black

More like hundreds of tanks, aircraft and equipment that end up never getting used and are currently rusting away in a giant lot in the Arizona desert

You got me, I'm a yank.

Attached: 1503102743466.jpg (1200x675, 63K)

woah watch out libtards it’s le based helicopter man xD
commies (everyone who isn’t a neoliberal corporatist) btfo

bump

Seething

Get out seppo

Attached: 1515699902567.png (791x672, 886K)

YEAHHHHH HEHE KILL EM HEH