What We All Need To Understand

Alright guys, let's all have a rational discussion.
There are very few cryptos that have a realistic future.
You talk about "normies" but you have no idea.
We haven't even made it to institutional money, though that is coming soon.
There are very few that will profit in the coming months/years.
BTC(gold) XRP/XLM(base/transferable protocols) IOTA(IoT/data mining), XMR(DNMs)
The rest of what you are shilling are absolute shitcoins.

Can we please talk about what else will maybe profit long term?

Attached: bog king of the hill.png (450x360, 168K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XR5UcrUY3Vo
youtube.com/watch?v=W-oyLEJyB3M
youtube.com/watch?v=gvajGWJPJGA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>XRP/XLM(base/transferable protocols) IOTA(IoT/data mining),

ayy lmao

No, BCH is gold because it's both gold and cash. No one wants a copy of gold that does nothing.

> muh LN though

see this is exactly why I know Biz is retarded.

XRP/XLM for banking/remittances/DEXchanges

IOTA for IoT and beyond. You're believing the FUD aren't you user?
There's no other cryptos that have the type of CONCRETE PARTNERSHIPS than these.
FUD AWAY....

BCH is a shitfork that has been trying to scam the community.
I'm not saying the tech is better or worse, just that there are ulterior motives that are in no way beneficial to the greater community.
They have only tried to undermine and deceive newfags.

Ulterior motives? You're falling for the AXA propaganda. Tell me how exactly "they" have been trying to scam and deceive noobs. All that's happened was Roger Ver changed it to 'Bitcoin (BCH) on the listing on bitcoin.com, RIGHT FUCKING NEXT TO BTC.

And while you're at it, tell me about the history of r/btc vs r/bitcoin.

Twitter - Pointing to BCH
Bitcoin.com pointing to BCH
CoinMarketCap pointing the website to BCH

Ulterior motives.
Nothing but a chink shitfork. It's ok, that's not what we're even talking about here. It's quality "alts".

You do realize the @bitcoin handle on twitter is from 2009? It's basically 80% chance he's in support of the BCH fork over BTC. Because nearly all the old timers from 2015 and earlier have migrated over to r/btc.

Bitcoin.com has info on BITCOIN, that includes BCH. And none of what's there is untrue. Also btw, Roger doesn't have a hand in BCH development or in its creation, figure you probably believe that too. Roger got onboard with stating his support for BCH a whole three weeks after the fork was made. Deadalnix, Jihan and a few devs and community members at r/btc made the plan together.

Why am I even writing, you're stupid enough to base your knowledge on what a bunch of astroturfing sockpuppets write and parrot what people are saying against BCH etc. as fact. Damnit. Go to r/btc and do your research.

Why would I defer to "history of reddit" you fucking faggot?