1. Your cunt

1. Your cunt
2. Is your welfare/pension system sustainable with your current population growth?

Attached: welfare.jpg (1099x750, 59K)

>having a welfare system
>having a pension system

Attached: 11lpgf8.jpg (276x280, 24K)

>population growth

Attached: laughingmacska.jpg (480x360, 26K)

our pension system is well run
but our healthcare system is absolutely fucked, it's based off of perpetual increases in funding by 7% a year

yes
will spend last days in a retirement home, getting ass wiped by brown girls

That's a weird question. If perpetual growth was necessary it would be a pyramid scheme and pyramid schemes don't work so well. Hm, maybe they work out for the pensioners who live before the pyramid collapses though, but this would be egotistical.

This is the current euro dilemna. Massive state spending requires population growth. And since euros refuse to have kids or cut spending then the only solution is to bring in immigrants. It is quite sad really, because even immigration is only a garden hose when you need a real rain. Also the cultural factor of people just not wanting to have kids (which is a time bomb in itself).
Euros will have to decide. Ethnic displacement, or being a bit poorer for a generation so that your descendants can be rich again.

>This is the current euro dilemna. Massive state spending requires population growth.
Proof?
> And since euros refuse to have kids
Children lead to massive spending. Educating them is expensive.

We have a negative growth but since our population is getting older, fewer people contribute to the pension system than take from it so it's gonna collapse soon.

The pension system requires at minimum replacement population growth as it is subsidized by the next generation.

Children are literally potential made manifest. They are the future of your country. Also they will pay taxes for life.

binlan
yes

It only cost pennies compared to everything else.

never heard of automation, huh?

That is a big gamble in my opinion, but it is all speculative so you may be right.

There is the the technological progress that makes that less and less working hours are needed to produce the same.

Guatemala seems so exotic, I think life there must be really different than here, like you have completely different problems like Europeans. While in Europe we struggle to raise our birthrates, in Guatemala you probably fight overpopulation. Guatemala's population has grown from 8 million in 1987 to 14 million in 2009 despite a lot of people leaving the country.

What are main problems in Guatemala?

they have put a man on the moon, im sure they can also make some zero effort meals and medication alarms for old people

brown girls in nursing homes usually treat patientls like shit, be ready

Oh wow, massive amounts of malnutrition, poverty, racial tensions, narcos, violence, gangs, lack of education, femicide, child abuse, CORRUPTION, and the cultural scars of our 36 year civil war. That is just to start! We need to start with sex education and nutrition imo. If you are malnourished as a toddler your mental capacity is stunted as well as your height, so half our country is short and ignorant. We are about 18 million people now. We have a UN corruption probe that seems to be helping, but narcos have free reign in the interior and the capital is the same Oligarchs running everything.
Despite all that I am optimistic. I am a rotary member and a part of un techo para mi pais which focuses on housing for the poorest of the poor. We are getting better.
Ironically too much emigration is hurting us. Our best and brightest leave, and remmitences create massive black markets and housing bubbles in the villages, and we get little to know actual infrastructure growth from it.

Hell yeah

Germany
It is curently, because of nearly ten years economic growth. Also our birthrate is growing and, besides the "muh immigrants" meme which now 100% comes as an reply. But you have pay for private insurrance if you want to have nerly your current standard if you go in pension. The pension inssurance of the state won´t give you mor then 48% of your current income.

But the boomers are gonna wreck social security

its the other way around the perpetual growth is required for such systems to function the young and working must pay for the old and decrepit.