Prove you’re not a blind follower and name one criticism of capitalism

whats wrong with monopoly?

everything now give up your monopoly over your own brain you oppressive fuck and redistribute it to tyrone

This. Free market is an autonomous system that can improve itself to reach perfection.

I'd like to get some examples of when monopoly is bad.
I only know examples when the government for example allows only 1 company to take care of the electrical needs of the country for example. So it's a government enforced monopoly.

I don't mind making money off modern serfs and further submerging normies into the abyss of degeneracy and mocking them by forcing them to chase the carrot in the perpetual cycle of wage slavery.

nice argument

this is the future they chose

Attached: 1511178870424.jpg (288x499, 77K)

It stifles competition which raises prices

it funds progress but stands in the way of progress because the only true regulation to capitalism is human greed in balance with the conscience of those who own the means of production. It's necessary just as death, for we didn't inherit a world full of technological wonders and instead have had to build it. However it has created a self-fulfilling philosophy that self-preservation is exactly equal to profit. As such we as a species that is progressing technologically at an exponentially faster rate are limited by the scope which capitalism provides and are unable to fathom the world after it. Once economic capital is made redundant and technology has evolved to the point where all insecurities are solved by genetic modification, then we are still left with cultural and social capital which we accrue by manifestation of self. The world we worship is material but it is not simply that, this is the ultimate limit of capitalism.

>unironically believing a system can be perfect

Attached: FA3FCBDD-8F21-416B-9D55-EFEA46CC5528.jpg (600x399, 66K)

Imagine if grids are private, youd end with infrastructural monopolies all over the place
People by no means are homo economicus and there should be joint effort to make capitalism less predatory

I have no problem being a blind follower of freedom.

Attached: natsoc.png (1080x534, 967K)

Capitalism encourages large corporations to lobby for easy immigration so they can import cheap labour.

Capitalism is the accumulation of wealth in order to invest it in productive improvements and the respect for contracts, what you're saying has little to do with capitalism and more to do with the tragedy of the commons related to the areas where capitalism is not being allowed.

The example I was talking about was generating electricity.
For the grid I agree that with current technology central control makes sense. Although it has its price - in my country for each unit of energy you pay 1/3 of actual energy use and 2/3 of operating grid cost. This is because of the investments that the central grid has made. Now imagine that a fusion power plant is installed and basically provides endless amount of energy for free - but your bill goes down only 1/3.

Why is that bad? Locals can't compete with pajeets?
Then the locals are behind competition. Putting walls to immigrants is another form of artificially blocking the flow of the market.

I think private property is a flawed system. God never came down from heaven and told your ancestors "this land belongs to you". It was just their land because they tended to it and defended it. To have laws set up where I can buy out land purely as an investment is a flawed system I think. If they're doing stuff with it and developing it, that's fine, but real-estate is something that I think needs to be redefined in the coming future, if everyone is going to be able to have a chance at having a home.

>just work for 10 cents a day goy!

Attached: 5A6CC062-78EF-4C44-94E1-0D78B846926E.jpg (1096x800, 571K)

Private property is a system designed to avoid conflict over scarce resources. Without it you will have conflicts for use of those resources without a clear solution, who has a better claim over something than the first person to mix his labor with it?

sounds like government caused that

communists should be removed from biz

>commie believes in god when it suits him

The left wing of the Nazi party got blown out, Hitler was pretty much a capitalist reactionary if you look at the facts. The big companies even paid less tax than under FDR in the US.

Attached: 41FKH9KHPHL._SX299_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (301x474, 30K)

Before they just shot the workers when they went on strike. Then the evil government said they couldn’t do that so they started importing slaves.

Attached: 53845269-6E7E-4BA3-917E-D3A7AFAEBAAD.jpg (3450x2668, 1.6M)

>The top personal income tax rate in 1941 was 13.7% in Germany, as opposed to 23.7% in Great Britain.[106]

Attached: 1517389015282.jpg (900x1600, 197K)

give me one example ever of workers being shot for going on strike

also
>voluntarily working for an agreed wage
>slaves

if you don't like it quit, what the fuck are you striking for your not entitled to anything

You know that fascism is just a form of capitalism right? You fucking retard. Nazi Germany still was capitalism. They still had privately owned companies and a free market you subhuman fucktard. kys

Attached: 1525188387824.png (381x353, 32K)

you can have a 100% anti capitalist system with 0 taxes, inflation, expropriation, public monopolies over really profitable low elasticity demand products, etc

>nazi germany
>fascist

dude how new are you, Italy was Fascist, Nazi Germany was National Socialist

He has a low IQ thus falls for empty rhetoric without looking at the numbers and laws.
Nazis still had stock exchanges and private companies, they were directly backed by the Krupp steel industry to defend against he commies.

those who can't participate in the market die

>nazi Germany
>NOT fascist

man you here a lot of utterly retarded shit on this site but this is some sort of record in being just fucking braindead.

>Capitalism is when the government doesn't do stuff.

Wrong. Deluded lolbertarian.

Attached: the slowest wojack of them all.jpg (211x239, 10K)

capitalism is an economic system based on private ownership and voluntary interactions, whilst many things the government does are non-voluntary there are somethings that they could do to fit in with this model. That isn't what I said however, I said every issue there is with capitalism is caused by state intervention into the free market

planned obsolescence

The state is very good at parasitism from classical capitalist economic activity and as a result is able to continue to metastatize. It is the largest cause of non natural death in the previous century, meaning destroying it is the most urgent and important thing for humanity to do in the world today.
Capitalism is effectively its food source and will remain so unless a proper cryptocurrency gains economic dominance and starves it to death. But then it wouldn't be "capitalism" of the kind the communists and fascists criticise anymore.

It is also worth noting however that neither a fascist nor a communist state could survive the advent of a fully decentralised cryptocurrency.
All states would be annihilated.

fascism is so much less about money and much more about people. i'll think you'll find its ironically one of the more malleable ideologies

Attached: fascism .png (886x1322, 125K)

Betriebsführer were directed by the government, wages were set by government, prices were set by government, so a fringe presence of stock exchange and private ownership just in name doesn't really make it capitalist, all of the workers were public servants subject to government ruling.

There's a central authoritarian government, so it's still a state. That is unacceptable. Such institutions must be destroyed. The centralisation of all that power in one place has a single inevitable result. And that result is never good.

why are mods not nuking this thread?

If I fondle the elites balls long enough some of their wealth might trickle on me.

This is why all boards love Jow Forums. You continually make on topic theads and don't let your politics bleed into every other board.

Attached: behind that post.jpg (600x600, 52K)

>all jobs are retail for the uneducated and untrained

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homestead_strike

Literally one example out of dozens

>every issue is because of state intervention
Nice platitude
>every issue with communism is because of misimplementation
Wew same shit different retard

Sorry, I meant you should compete with the pajeet and his masters in EE working for 40k a year.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_worker_deaths_in_United_States_labor_disputes

wtf dude

>Why is that bad? Locals can't compete with pajeets?
>Why is lowering my QOL and reducing my pay and benefits in order to compete with a growing amount of supply and lowering amount of demand a bad thing?
How fucking retarded can you get exactly?

That's a function of government making college education artificially expensive in the US and holding its citizens to a higher standard for education while pajeet can brown his way through some bogus school. The job itself likely wouldn't require as much "training" as US students must face with.

If it were an equal playingfield in that regard then there'd be deflation in asset prices as wages are depressed, thus making 40k not so bad.

Maybe we'd have more entrepreneurs in the US if the college meme only ended up paying 40k for pajeet to send back as a remittance.

>Didn't even read it
At least said central state actually wants its own population to prosper

Wrong, only applies for national industries/natural monopolies.

Nonsense strawmen? At best, big exaggerations? Well fuck me, here's a Nazi I want to engage in conversation.

That was supposed to be for the op

>people with no redeeming quality other than having money, can make money by having money
>they soon end up being more powerful than states and influencing them completely

Capitalism final form is always "bad capitalism". The idea behind capitalism is great, but just as communism, it cannot exist because it depends on human factors. You will never have good capitalism, it will always end with some Rothschild jewish bankers behind the curtains.