May i have your attention please

ok guys it's not funny anymore
i know user is the worst kind of internet user and u all like to troll and shit on other ppl's stuff
but this is just unacceptable
u can pump nano back to top 100 now, we already had our laughs ya we already larped all the possible fud posts and doble deposits and shit
u can go back to nano now
u all know this shit is going to replace bitcoin in less then one year
u all know we are talking about a feeless and instant crypto that's going from 800m cap to 800 billion
we all know that's a x1000 safe and guaranteed ROI
u can go back now, the joke is over

Attached: nano_logo.png (960x565, 93K)

i meant top 10

So glad I didn't buy into this the other day

its a shitcoin without any product or prospects. even if someone fonaly managed to make hashgraph work as it is supposed to do and introduce some spam protection it would still be worthless. no one needs hashgraph and noone needs nano.

merchants need nano because they keep getting btfo by 2% visa/mastercard fees

they don't cause they don't pay for it, the customer ends uppaying for it

Once this picks up steam again its going to explode. Keeping filling your bags for cheap.

Simplicity always wins. That is why normies and reddit love it so much.

nah the custo pays the same whether they use cash or card. meaning if they choose card instead of cash walmart has to stomach a big ass loss

>only pure currency coin that will be adopted is BTC even though its a shit currency but even if it succeeds as gold this works
>platform coin like ETH or VEN or something will be adopted for smart contracts for real world use
>some kind of interoperabilty coin connects ecosystems together, ICX/ARK/IOTA etc and transfers value from one chain to another
>where the fuck is the need for NANO

This is not a real use case and is missing the scope of change coming with blockchain tech. For merchants to adopt NANO across the board, we need a shift of infrastructure. No one is going to invest in nodes and supporting infrastructure to save 2% on fees while tossing aside the valid benefits things like VISA bring to the table.

Look guys, buy NANO all you want if you want a short term flip. I see it doing fine in short/mid term. But this thing doesn't DO anything necessary to actually impact the world on a large scale. It has no shot at long term use, yet all I see are bagholders shilling it as the literal future. I don't understand.

the fuck? merchants are already approaching nano left right and centre. they're sick of their profit margins being reduced by 2%

$600 billion a year is spent on remittance fees alone

>NANO doesn't do anything

>muh headphones.com wow such adoption
How much of that will nano capture? Without an ecosystem around it, not much.

Guys don't get so tribal. I'm not calling this a shitcoin, I just don't see how it gets adopted on a wide scale without more features. It exists in its own little bubble and that is a huge mark against it in this sphere.

>How much of that will nano capture?
nothing cause nano is feeless :D

BTFO

But obvi that'd be good for NANO as more people buying = higher price. Clever retort though

This is easily worked around: simply provide a “cash rebate” for people who use cash. You’re not allowed to charge people extra for using their card, but nobody said anything about offering discounts for those who don’t. They do it for gas, and you can do it for all products.

Lmao .. the absolute state of nano shills
Ok user ... Ok

>the absolute delusion of nano baggers
You guys are absolutely missing the forest for the trees. Fees and speed are the least complex problem to solve in this space yet it's all you guys have a hardon for.
>feeless
>speedy
>secure data/value transfer
>Ecosystem of interoperability
>Linkage with oracles with provable real data
This is what we need going forward to actually disrupt things. When something like that appears, and it will, NANO has 0 leg up over something like that. As of right now I see no plans from the devs to add anything like that either.

Nano is technical superior to bitcoin in absolutely every aspect.

Here's the thing. Imagine a currency that you could send and take with you anywhere. That has minimal surface area and complexity. You are now imagining a limited supply global currency, which replaces and supercedes the cash issued by all national governments.

If you don't Na, now you No

You are thinking way too narrow

I can't emphasize enough the analogy of cash with Nano. If there's ever a privacy feature/fork and an airdrop to Nano holders, it becomes digital cash in the most efficient form yet realized, with no fee for exchange between any other party, and minimum delay. You will have it wherever you have a mobile device, which will serve as your wallet.