Here you go fren

>thinking he's not talking about chainlink

ITT pic

Attached: 1523006683154.jpg (1129x1200, 118K)

I don't understand coding enough to understand the process. i'm assuming the GUI that is in pivotal tracker will take care of these processes when mainnet launches?

It's near

DELET

doesn't look like anything to me

Stop fudding this isn't chain link

Stop shitting your celf

Cryplets = Chain = Chain's Link product, not Chainlink. Christ you Linkies are so desperate for news you'll believe anything is about you won't you.

Attached: linkbrainlet.png (645x729, 174K)

absolute nonsense

>the state of this fud

orly? Cryplets are confirmed to be running on Chain, not Chainlink.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-05-15 at 7.22.00 PM.png (643x476, 101K)

the article is about chainlink that's all that matters
The nonsense is you talking about cryplets, not the subject at all

>“ When the node initially deposits LINK to a matching contract, they establish an “available deposit”. The available deposit is held by the matching contract,
but is available to be withdrawn by the oracle whenever they desire. When an oracle makes an offer on an SLA request and is selected, the amount of LINK required by the SLA is moved by the matching contract out of the available deposit and designated for the SLA deposit.At the end of the SLA, the LINK deposited that was not penalized is moved back into the available deposit, as well as the LINK received for services.”

TOTALLY NOT CHAINLINK UUUUUURH

Attached: 1522943693115.png (1416x1600, 606K)

1,327 commits
17 contributors

Now, I believe we are really gonna make it. Will double my stack this week. This shit has already done really well without any marketing.

This is a pretty decent overview. It's neat that there's a Microsoft employee doing this, but if you look him up you'll see that he's a very recent employee. Definitely not a bad thing and may be a hint at the holy Microsoft partnership we talk about but nothing is confirmed obviously.

It's a good write up that covers the scope of what is currently possible on the test network. This includes the following:
>ChainLink node details, the application node operators will be running to launch a node on LINK network which then connects to the Ethereum blockchain to be ready to accept smart contracts
>Given that LINK is first going to run on Ethereum's blockchain he goes into how Ethereum smart contracts will need to be written to interact with and get off-chain data using the LINK network. He covers things like the payment of LINK tokens for requesting off-chain data.

I would encourage anyone who wants to learn some details about how the LINK network will function to read through this. I think even without a programming background it shouldn't be too hard to understand the concepts.

its not. I already said, its Chain's Link. Two different projects. I know its confusing for a brainlet but you should really try to keep up.

Nazarov was killed in russia two months ago

>Technical Overview of the Chainlink Testnet Implementation

>Chainlink attempts to bridge off chain data to on chain smart contracts through a decentralized oracle.

>A little while back I got interested in how Chainlink works. This is what I found out.

He's not talking ajout Chainlink at all you're right. Keep making up Chain's Links, ChainzLink's Chain'slin'ks or whatever, you fud is shit

This fud is horrible, you had enough Time to accumumate, you can't fud this Medium Post.

Oh it's the real astro

um could you not

> Therefore, requesting smart contracts must be funded by Link tokens.
We all on the same page on this one right? The contract must be paid with Linkies if there's a need to pay gas costs for whatever, then that can be sent too but the contract itself needs linkies. How many linkies and all that we still don't know.

This is about Chainz not LINK.

>How many linkies and all that we still don't know.
the amount of link tokens paid will be set by/bid on by the contract creator/node operators.

He's been there for 2 and a half years wtf you talking about? Before that he was at Lockhead..

As in he only graduated about 2 years ago. Just saying that he's not the guy heading up Bletchley or anything. Just trying to be more grounded and critical of what information is available to us.

Let's stop beating around the bush and ask him questions on r/LINKTRADER (No official moderation from SC.com team)

We would like to find out:

1) If there is any talk about Chainlink at his workplace in Microsoft?
2) What he thinks about the chances of widespread adoption?
3) How far away does he think mainnet is?

I would ask but i'm a pussy

Attached: 4860052.png (450x450, 255K)

Yes, but the order of magnitude of LINK for nodes and contracts still seems like a big question mark.

>(No official moderation from SC.com team)
Just moderation from bagholders that are much less prone to free discussion

This, this is a very nice writeup if you have basic programming knowledge and are familiar with what the team is working on. Thanks aleksy.

That said, this has nothing to do with the chainlink network that is using the tokens. Quit being so fucking desperate

this. his github repo has LINK and REQ... and that's it. this dude is a low level engineer just fucking around with side projects. Linktards get too excited about this shit but have clearly never worked as a developer.

>The missing link(pun intended) is currently the staking/matching contract which will drive the process of how oracle nodes are matched with requesting smart contracts. This is currently not in the public repo.

Does this imply they've done some work on it in a private repo?

the market will decide I guess...

exactly, don't be a nob faggot. he has no idea about any of those questions.

We're gonna make it, holy shit. Link fud btfo forever

How rich do you think running a node will make us?

This isn’t about ChainLink it’s about ChinkLock

Buy Mobius PLEASE. Your life is will be changing! Do be avoiding Sergey. He very, very stupid evil man!

>some rando who works as a low level dev makes medium article
>linkies think its partnership with microsoft
is this peak bagholder delusion

Attached: SE.png (815x99, 6K)

who are you even talking to? nobody knows.

less shitposts, more discussing the technical overview that we were so gratefully given

He can just respond or not respond. Either are telling and we get more info. Stop being a pussy and ask him

the singularity is one step closer

Well, if any of you fags bother to read the article, its definitely chainlink (dont fall for some retarded FUD), but he never mentions microsoft or any real life application. Seems he is just interested in it.

i sent him a friendly pm on reddit, everyone calm down. will post results

oh its not microsoft its micro's soft.

Attached: dont die.png (1920x1080, 2.04M)

he wouldnt be writing a medium piece about LINK if there wasnt substantial interest in it from microsoft'd end. this is probably the most bullish thing to happen LINk wise in all of 2018. major development.

Okay.

I owe you an apology, the fucking faggots on link trader have taken it down. Spastics

just sold 100k. its clear to me that aleksy is working on chain/cryptlets.. anyone who doesnt see this is a deluded fool.

Nah, it's the opposite for me desu.

He basically says it is for his own personal interest. That's why I would like him to answer a few questions to get clarification on his involvement.

Then we can dump this shitcoin before the Californians wake up.

Yes, this is actually the biggest news from the post. It means that they've already been working on the staking/matching for some time in private, which is supposed to be one of the most difficult aspects of the project.

Everyone who's been predicting mainnet release being six months or more out just got btfo. This points to mainnet being ready sooner rather than later.

Attached: 1515563970536.gif (500x500, 1.84M)

oh shit you're right user, I missed that. great catch! dubs confirm.

ya that's actually dankarino news. I was starting to sweat it seeing how much shit is still in the icebox on Pivotal and yet not seeing any mention of the reputation system.

People can do what they want in their freetime. If you work at mcdonalds and shill bazingacoin, that doesnt mean mcdonalds has substantial interest in bazingacoin.

>He basically says it is for his own personal interest.
if he was being sincere about that, why write an article about it for public consumption? doesnt make sense. what's most likely going on is that this is some sort of "signal" to persons unknown about the project. everything's smoke and mirrors with LINK.

We have concluded this for the past week. Have you seen my image above from Steve's GitHub about private repositories?

After I posted it on here, he changed his settings and made it disappear.

All these fucking devs lurk. Hodges and Steve for sure.

Sorry Steve!

old news, steve ellis has heaps of commits to private repos on github.

If there was a connection, then why write an article about it for public consumption? Now that doesnt make sense.
If its a personal interest he has every reason to write a medium article about it. Medium is pretty much a blog site dude..

I'm laughing so fucking hard

The one thing I noticed is that he does seem to have a large audience going by the number of 'claps' he received.

When I checked he had 89 claps within the first hour of being posted on reddit where he only had a few upvotes.

That suggests to me that he maybe posted it somewhere else with a lot of interest.

Unless claps can be influenced by bots idk.

isnt this his only article on medium? if that's correct, then that's weird in itself. LINK is like some esoteric mystery religion. fuck.

so? private repo != reputation system. lots of developers hack on random private repos for various side projects or shared configs. hell, private repos are a great way to keep bash profiles in sync between machines so that alone could easily account for half of those commits.

its one thing to hear there's a separate repo, and then go see commits to a private repo to confirm that information. seeing commits to a private repo and connecting that dot to a separate repo for the reputation system that we've had no confirmation exists is a massive reach.

1) Yes/No/haven't heard -> NDA. If he knows anything cool or important he probably can't tell us.
2) Not his competence
3) Guesswork. There are new tasks up for grabs on pivotaltracker all day and it will be ready when it's ready.

> After getting the necessary info from the Callback data structure, the data is sent to the requesting smart contract! This is how requests are fulfilled!
> How are jobs stuck in pending confirmations state re-started?
This is bolded, I don't know if it's a super smart way to do it or a horrible one or it's supposed to be an illuminating moment or what.

none of the faucet stuff is in public repositories and we know they're making progress on that, so that's all that is.

github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/graphs/contributors

Ctrl + F 'aklintsevich'. He is a Chainlink developer and also a Microsoft Cryptlet developer

it's been posted on every chainlink community online. There's a lot of bagholder out there including 4k on slack, and another 12k on the reddit subforums.

But now you can't see that he has been working on private repos.

Doesn't that suggest to you that he doesn't want us knowing that he is working there? Why wouldn't he want us knowing?

And why would this change be made within an hour of me posting the picture on biz?

No, we only know he's part of the Azure team and have no evidence he's actually part of cryptlets or even project bletchley.

It was surely Ropsten and Parser.

>This is bolded, I don't know if it's a super smart way to do it or a horrible one or it's supposed to be an illuminating moment or what.

ya I'm a developer and I'm not really sure what's up with that. Is he excited? about callbacks?

the only thing I can think of is that callbacks are a super common pattern for developers, so maybe by highlighting this is how data is processed its supposed to be like "yo, this shit's easy! you barely have to learn a thing!". maybe? idunno. definitely a strange choice.

We could ask him?

it's not a great leap in the dark to think it's likely that an MS azure dev who writes articles on chainlink would also have a finger in the the cryplet pie? not saying it's 100%, but i'd say it's a pretty good bet.

Yes, I saw that, but this is a public admission. It was a while ago that Sergey mentioned during that presentation he helped with cryptlets. Before that people would have been able to conclude he had worked on the project given that he owned the domains, but him announcing it cuts out all the ambiguity and residual incredulity. Straight from the horse's mouth.

Could we ask him?

Don't ask him. They're likely trying to keep the two projects separate for a reason. We've already got the connection through Sergey anyways, no need to stir the pot.

Attached: scrooge-mcduck-logo-200x200-7463.png (200x200, 99K)

>unironically fudding this
If you're not on the rocketship at this point might as well just kys

Guess y’all gonna want me to delete this. Look who wrote the fucking article!

Attached: 14365699-D441-4585-8FA7-D3719E18D3B1.png (1125x2436, 1.31M)

We know about this for ages. Get your shit up to speed, user.

Lol newfag, everyone know who he is

we knew, but thanks anyway
checked

>doubles his 1k stack
>still doesn't make it

Ask #3

My bad guess since I’ve been holding presibos and knowing im going to make it I missed a few details along the way

^

Underrated

Not everyone can be 24/7 on biz, fren

Bumping this to make fudders sweat

rolling

let them fud. if anyone has any doubts about the fundamentals of this project at this point, it's their own fault if they aren't on board.

$1,000 EOY baby!

control+F
Singularity
$1000EOY
Jason Parser
We are all in this together
It's happening tonight

>no result

Not related to LINK

This is the funniest way to shill this coin lmao
>8 months later price is still 50 cents