Countries where gay marriage is legal

It could be a god-tier country if there weren't all these niggers

It probably will be another LatAm country.

then wtf is Tel Aviv?

>then wtf is Tel Aviv?
A gay city but gay marriage isn't legal and they go abroad to Europe to get married and then come back.

Attached: 1511639520191.png (331x404, 138K)

Meanwhile in South Africa youtube.com/watch?v=jC-pgpIzlyQ

Add India

thats pretty gay man

>-t. angry Mutti 'I don't approve of it but I'll let you vote'

Take the Christfag delusions and shove them up where the sun don't shine

Hope a Palestinian explodes into lasagna all over your citizens.

Attached: angela merkel.jpg (300x225, 70K)

t. saffer

fuck off

They stopped doing suicide bombings long ago.
Now they just do stabbings and they're pretty bad at it as well.
Yeah I guess.
I don't do that stuff so I'm fine.

This. They even disowned whitey imperialists recently making them even more based

>Countries that are colonies of Israel.

retard

We only have it because of our tyrannical judicial system

personal freedom and liberty!! (but only for straight, white folk)

I think gay marriage is still illegal here

The majority of the population didn't want it, so no not at all.

Based grey countries

Didn't they just allow gay sex? That implies a high demand for it, huh...

Popular support for gay marriage has surpassed opposition since at least 2010, grandpa.

The court repealed section 377 of the penal code, which was about unnatural sexual acts. Gay marriage is still not recognised. You can have gay sex now, but you can't marry a man.

>A May 2015 Gallup poll found 60% of Americans supported same-sex marriage, 37% opposed, and 3% had no opinion.
>A February–March 2015 Wall Street Journal poll found that 59% of Americans favored same-sex marriage.
this is before obergefell v. hodges btw. obviously it can vary quite a bit between regions, but i'd say that this isn't too far off from people's public opinion where i live, in suburban austin, texas.

because your religious right made it a federal issue and the supreme court treated it as such
delicious irony

It's what happens when they don't get bobs and vagen

usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2018/01/25/tolerance-takes-hit-americans-less-accepting-lgbt-people-2017-survey-shows/1062188001/

And it will continue to decline since socially liberal people don't have children.

Thank you for clarifying.
Lel gotta get that release somewhere.

Same with abortion or segregation or literally any other non-issue right wingers fuss about lmao.

we will be in there soon :)

This is a survey about LGBT people and not on the support for gay marriage.

In anglo cunts, was it decided by legislators or some boomers in a court?

Based real China.

Not in Alabama it's not. Maybe in Fagifornia.

gay marriage has been legal throughout the country for a few years now actually

So, what happens in Mexico?

It happened under Obama, so it was the legislators. Boomers just don't give a shit.
The majority of the states here said no, it was only through the supreme court, that we have nationwide legal gay marriage.

This guy is literally living in the past and doesn't even know it. Gay marriage has been legalized throughout the US, even Alabama.

>2018
>still allow gay marriage

And I quote, "All rights not expressly granted to Congress herein are hereby awarded to the states."

Since the Constitution doesn't mention anything about marriage in it...you connect the dots.

So much for states rights. It should be up to the individual states like before, but thanks to our buddies in the SCOTUS - well we got it.

>Supreme court
>Legislators

American education.

murder, kidnapping, theft, rape, drug deals, corruption, prostitution, slavery, corruption

Attached: 1533163205611.jpg (1043x1500, 213K)

You just described the USA, amigo.

yeah but people here like it

Attached: 1535688371200.jpg (708x1003, 122K)

The great irony here is that gay marriage was legalized in response to a federal law that sought to ban it, lmao.

Das Stimmt. It's true

He's probably talking about Obergefell v. Hodges which isn't a legitimate court ruling and should just be dismissed out of hand.

Didn't Trump say social issues should be left to the state and local level?

Was this before or after he threatened to cut federal funding to sanctuary cities?

Immigration law is federal so he was just enforcing existing laws on that.

It isn't here and hopefully never will be.

Your record of abysmal social progress is why Marie Curie was a French success and not Polish one

Poland recognizes residency rights of same-sex spouses and cohabitation, though.

Is it me, or does anyone else have the nagging suspicion that the Germ ITT is that faggot bearspammer?

I don't know if it is, but I do hate that guy.

Nah, it's just your paranoia(and repressed homosexuality) acting up again. No sane person would believe that the 3 most common flag on this board would be the same poster.

Faggots are filthy walking AIDS magnets and literally nobody but a minority of professional SJW and fag activist groups wants faggot marriage.

Based Poland laying down the redpills. The thing is, I wouldn't even care if they kept it in their bedroom but instead they feel the need to politicize buttfucking. They also won't just settle for being tolerated, you also have to embrace them.

Liking gay marriage and abortion with a constitution wrote 200 years ago is total bullshit, and I have no idea why burgers think this is okay whatsoever.

>we should ignore the law of the land because it upsets SJWs' fee-fees

That's what Ruth Bader Ginsberg thinks anyway. The Constitution was written by old white CIS male fascists who kept slaves and it can be ignored/reinterpreted as we please.

The 200 year old constitution (with amendments) is what they have to work with
At least when we used theirs as a model we'd been able to observe 100 years of trial error which is why things like marriage were an explicit federal power.

>we'd been able to observe 100 years of trial error which is why things like marriage were an explicit federal power
Australia has a stronger history of nanny state-ism than the US which is why you have no proper equivalent of the Bill of Rights and can get v& for drawing Lisa Simpson R34.

been to Tel Aviv. It was more gay than San Francisco. I'm pretty sure the only reason gay marriage isn't legal, is cause they want to keep it taboo, to make it hot and transgressive.

>The interpretation of the constitution should radically change with what society considers good

If it wasn't bullshit, you could give the same case to judges 50, 100, 150 or 200 years ago and have the same result.

>The interpretation of the constitution should radically change with what society considers good

I sure ain't Ruth Bader Ginsberg who thinks it's a "living" document.

So basically, she wants an all-powerful, non-elected, massively biased third chamber to decide whatever it wants.

I think even John Roberts said that was utter bullshit.

>tfw shitaly is third world
feels bad desu, at least we have civil unions but still no adoptions

Based italy

Only allowed in some states.

Why do people care so much about this?
Marriage is just a stupid boring ceremony.

Not really, even if one city has a big area that's super gay you have to remember the majority in the country are Mizrahim and they have the biggest party in the government, that's why it isn't legal.
It's kind of like how leftists are only concentrated in major cities in the US.
And yes they also really like protesting against not having rights for some reason even though they're almost equal as of now and they still complain they get fired because they shove them being gay in the faces of customers in their workplace and don't get how that makes people uncomfortable.

aka fucked up countries without future

It represents that gay relationships and people are seen as equal to heterosexual ones by society. This might seem irrelevant to you but if you suffer through threat of ostracization, violence and constant bullying for something you didn't get to choose then it's obviously a big deal

uccidi frocio

>the only african country with some whites in it is miles ahead of any other african nation

hmm

e con uccidi intendevo ucciditi, deviato di merda

>This might seem irrelevant to you but if you suffer through threat of ostracization, violence and constant bullying for something you didn't get to choose then it's obviously a big deal
Do you think maybe if they kept it in private and didn't have parades where they walk around naked and ejaculate on each other, that they wouldn't ostracized and bullied?

>threat of ostracization, violence and constant bullying

Virgins have it worst than fags.

No because that doesn't happen literally anywhere where every gay has to hide. How could anyone be stupid enough to post such a thing? Maybe this is your brain on Jow Forums

>It represents that gay relationships and people are seen as equal to heterosexual ones by society

Shall we also think zoophiles and pedophiles are equal and just like us?

Are you just pretending to be retarded or are you being serious?

botswana is ahead of them though

Tell us why someone is deserving of special snowflake status and respect because they happen to fuck a butt.

Reminder that the whole point of marriage is to have kids and create a family. Gay marriage is pointless, and leads to nothing whatsoever

looks like the latin america is testing the idea that allowing gay marriage would make them the first world

That's pretty gay.

Semantica legale: voi due non siete cazzi di capirla. E, apparentemente, nemmeno quelli che hanno creato la mappa nell'OP.

Le unioni civili sono letteralmente matrimoni omosessuali, non si chiamano "matrimoni gay" perché sennò il Vaticano piangeva.

More or less. If you don't have (biological) kids, there's nothing really bonding a couple together.

Why can't you just treat gays the same? Equal status != special snowflake status