In America it's now legal to punch a man if you shout "nazi" before punching

kek

So? I don’t like communist but that doesn’t mean I should assault them

I'd fine him 10,000

I don't care what your politics are, civility must be enforced in public.

What verdicts like this tell people is that it's okay to do it, what else is there to take away

guess we should all start brawling

if they want to let society degrade to that of the common russian, or dare I say, frenchman

and that's a good thing

>dat flag
>dat post
What are you?

wtf I thought we were following you down the pit of savagery

Nighty night fascist fuck

Attached: heem'd.jpg (750x500, 33K)

a rational human being I expect

this

It’s time

Attached: 29A26919-11C8-4CB0-A997-417C1C862DC7.jpg (605x871, 117K)

As dumb as fascist/Nazis are, it doesn’t set a good precedent to condone political violence against anyone no matter how distasteful their position is

agreed, it's unamerican

Hate crimes are a time honored American tradition.

the only passable violence in our history was against loyalists

So at what point do we get 1920’s Berlin style brawls between commies and fascists?

My grandpa got paid to shoot them

never. we aren't that country and don't suffer its disease

no, we'll just let it fester until civil war 2 electric boogaloo starts

your pursuit of that nu civil war meme really makes me wonder how sane you are

If I were on a jury for this, even if the defendant was clearly guilty as shit, I'd try to get my fellow jurors to nullify.

you're brainwashed if you believe this is how america always is

Trump voters should learn they have no place in the USA and should fuck off to Hungary and Russia.

always is what? what do you mean with your post, it's meaning is entirely unassigned

CIVIL WAR! CIVIL WAR! CIVIL WAR! Hurry up and fight already you pussies. Fucking do it! I wanna see yank blood.

Attached: MAGA_rope_feels.png (411x600, 94K)

We're too fat to do Weimar style street brawls

the constant mass shootings, police brutality, completely polarized politics, and general feeling of dissatisfaction in the system?

There was this caricature in russian newspapers in 1917, with a picture of an american gentleman and a russian bydlo
The text under the american said " Nobody can hit me, we have freedom here"
The text under the russian said "I can hit everyone, we have freedom here"
If courts start making political decision, then there's obviously something very wrong with it.

We could ram mobility scooters into each other

I don't think that's how it is though. Never gave any indication to that line of reasoning. I thought that was your way of thinking?

but all of those things are objectively true though??

Where does all the butthurt even come from? Other than 'le libs' or 'the pedes'? Is a race war really inevitable?

Police brutality has always existed the difference is we have more cameras now

There was more civil unrest in the 60s. Also don't forget the OKC attack, Waco/ruby ridge, LA riots, etc. USA has always been crazy town

no, certainly not

>$1

oh no no no no

we certainly are more patient with the activities of the outliers than other societies on this earth

completely delusional

americans can't stand when someone has a different opinion from them

I live in the real world friend, not your internet assembled mental illness

>completely delusional

You have the historical memory of a goldfish

The prize of freedom

Weimar happened right inbetween two fascist militaristic governments and societies. It was completely unthinkable 5 years before and 5 years after.

you're telling me that the notion of post war imperial Germany failing as a democracy was seen as a ludicrous one?

ha

also the empire wasn't fascist

Based

I'm not him, but the Netherlands is consensus driven. In theory we aim for the win-win situations. In practice we all take radical standpoints, compromise at some point in the middle where everyone gets a little bit, and the result is completely risk-free, dull and uninspired

The notion of some weird divided Germany with different groups battling each other on the street was quite unthinkable during imperial times.

we're the same except we don't compromise and there usually isn't a result until someone breaks the deadlock

>we take radical standpoints
No we don't. Most people take the middle-ground and then some people on the far edges raise a lot of hell and get their way.

otherwise known as getting something done

>"nazi"
>""

I bet you're a "faggot" just like this poor misunderstood "nazi"

>no we don't

>meanwhile we have the most radical anti-Islam party
>the most radical christian parties
>a genuine socialist party
>an animal party
>the most radical liberal policies

>most divided and turmoil laden period in american history since the civil war
in the late 1800s they lynched tons of italians for being catholic. there was an actual race war in oklahoma in the 1920s. in the 1960s whites dumped acid on black people in pools.

>but some Jow Forumslock getting punched is equal to all that

Attached: 1535316706768.jpg (600x703, 46K)

None of those have any power. Our country has been lead by a coalition of centre, centre-left and centre-right parties since 1960.

>MY WH*TE ASS IS ON FFFFFFFIIIIIIIRRRRREEEEE

hysteria is an end to itself, no other times before you matter when it's your perspective that matters :^)

is nazi just a synonym for white supremacist now

someone claiming this is the most divisive period in american history after the civil war is clearly wrong though. even the 90s militia movement had more heat than people punching each other.

from what I've seen it's actually taken on the meaning of whoever your camp disagrees with fundamentally

>We Nazis are tolerant and open to untermensch, right my fellow haplobrethren?

Attached: 2u977zn.jpg (300x400, 17K)

that's not what i'm saying, it's just weird to equate a German political movement to some weird yanks not liking mexicans