Americans planned another coup in Latin America!

Russia supported Communist uprisings in dozens of countries throughout the 20th century.

and in all of those cases the communists were fighting against deep local injustice and imperialist regimes

USSR supported, not Russia

Thanks for showing your true colors ANTIFA.

Communism will always fail.

>USSR supported, not Russia
LOL

The USSR was Russian imperialism + Communism.

What pretext they can fabricate for war this time?

Strikes against Syria showed that Trump is the same warmonger as Bush, btw. Military industrial complex owns him lock, stock and barrel.

>tfw USSR started by Jews and Germans, then ruled by Georgian dictator. All the benefits went to non-russian republics in the union like baltics, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan.

Don't know what are you taking about, m8

>force Venezuela to give their oil to corporations to control
>they refuse
>put sanctions on them and call them anti-democracy

>Saudi Arabia and Norway refuse to to give their oil to corporations to control
>nothing happens

Attached: 1-Donald-Trump-Saudi-King.jpg (610x415, 215K)

>Russian imperialism
kill yourself dane, soviet influence was the greatest thing to ever happen to the world and especially countries like denmark and australia only have a social welfare system like we do thanks to the influence and innovations of the soviet union

the pretext is "helping the venezuelan people to overthrow tyranny and achieve democracy like all the good nations on Earth"
the problem is when those venezuelan bastards can be divided between bydlo ACTUALLY wanting the same stupid shit party to continue with their gibsmedats and rather have Cabello (who is the same ignorant shit) over Maduro, and those that escape like rats to other countries so they can get the gibs from THOSE countries
fucking commies

>All the benefits went to non-russian republics
where is proofs of that? only Moscow didn't have famine you pidarazz

>tfw USSR started by Jews and Germans, then ruled by Georgian dictator.
That ended with Stalin.

>All the benefits went to non-russian republics in the union like baltics, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan.
It was cheaper for Russia than to fight separatist wars. Also you forgot to mention how in some of those countries you gulag'd the intellectuals and students and replaced them with low-skilled Russian peasants.

It's common knowledge here, lol.
The Kremlin was showering local elites with money back then, as it does now with Chechnya.

>soviet influence was the greatest thing to ever happen to the world and especially countries like denmark and australia only have a social welfare system like we do thanks to the influence and innovations of the soviet union

What? The Social Democrats hated communists and the USSR and supported NATO.

>bribing elites
>"giving benefits to the other republics"
choose one and only one

Removing intellectuals is typical step for early gommunism. Like in China, like in Cambodia, like everywhere

>according to American officials
I know they have alot of tools for pressure, but why other countries are ok with this? They make scandal about "Russian involvement" in their elections, but they don't even try to hide their involvement in coups around the world.
Today it's Venezuela. Tommorow it could be any European country. It's illusion to think that they will not touch you, when it will be profitable to them.

And due to the Monroe doctrine there is nothing you can do about it :^)

Attached: monroe doc.jpg (930x450, 109K)

They bribed them with federal moneyz
I know that locals in those republics didn't get much

>tfw Nikki Haley is butthurt at UN
>tfw when it comes to listening to UN now it's suddenly "dictators' club" and we don't need it

>how Americans are only concerned about countries that have a metric ton of oil? Or where they can exploit people's misery for profit?
That must be why we profited from Iraqi oil and get so much from the middle East. Oh wait, neither are true. Also, Venezuela has garbage oil.

>Venezuela has oil?
Terrible quality
>Cocaine?
Possibly. I think they can grow coca but I don't think they really do.

fucking america man...
>when Hardt & Negri say that imperialism is over

>Let Latin Americans deal with it
we gonna send them to Spain so they get schengen and travel to Finland afterwards :D that's how we'll deal with it

>We should just let Venezuela fester. Let Latin Americans deal with it. Or not deal with it. Commies deserve to die of starvation.
This

You did profit from Iraq. A LOT. Out of all types of disgusting mutts, those like you are the absolutely worst.

ROFL read up on the precursors to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. They supported a communist coup of a progressive reformest and when the members of that coup went after each other, supported another coup against the lead commie (who they actually assassinated), as the people were actively rising up against the commie's stupidity. Finally the Soviets invaded to back up their puppets. Sounds very progressive and a fight against injustice.

Or maybe financing them? Huehue

Which when the USSR collapsed Russia had us (U.S. and other powers) sign a document stating that Russia was the sole succesor of the USSR.

We are the most shabbos goyim nation in the region. What else these people want? Holy shit.

Great - more refugees!

Attached: Madrid_RefugeesWelcome_Lightbox.png (453x607, 425K)

>and those that escape like rats to other countries so they can get the gibs
Do they actually get gibs though?

>as it does now with Chechnya.
Should have just nuked them.

Der ewige Mutt...

Attached: 1531835053287.jpg (1362x1952, 463K)

You profitied heavily from fucking mutt, dont ever speak unless spoken to.

Attached: 1528891838301.png (1920x1578, 191K)

not in my cunt of course
we're not commies like them
the most they get is sympathy and work opportunies
and in Argentina ALL immigrants get free hospital and free "entrance" to the uni

>You did profit from Iraq. A LOT.
You're so full of shit. Shia, Iran and Kurds profited the most from that war. We paid in blood and money (both for military and rebuilding).

>tfw i am afghan irl
the ebil gommies you are referring to actually just wanted to achieve mild land reforms in a country owned by brutal childrapist feudal lords for a thousand years

the soviet military response was a response to this:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone

I don't think we profited user, Iraq War ruined our economy.

A few select capitalists, shareholders, and investment firms profiting is not the same as Americans profiting. American people certainly did not profit.

Attached: 1536020762588.jpg (1278x638, 38K)

>what are fake news?

>You
he didn't profit shit
only the fucking jews
that's the irony, why defending ANY politician FOR FREE, all they do is fuck the citizens up

We are facing a humanitarian crisis in South America. Venezuelan refugees are flooding to Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, etc. If a military intervention is necessary to get rid of all the refugees in Argentina, I support it. After all they all say that they want to go back to Venezuela.

>says he will fight the deep state
>joins the deep state

Attached: trump doing what he's supposed to do.png (856x800, 392K)

>destroyed other nation (Iraq) because totally unrelated nation (Saudi) attacked
>WE PAYED IN BLOOD! WE REBUILT!

You shouldn't be there in first place

You fuckers have no clue what you're talking about.

foreignpolicy.com/2013/03/17/a-decade-later-and-the-iraq-debate-is-still-contaminated-with-myths/

And that website is considered minimum biased. You can argue military contractors made money but that literally comes out of U.S. taxes not Iraq oil.

Lol you have no clue than about your countries history

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saur_Revolution

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed_Daoud_Khan

>before his assassination in 1978 as a result of the Saur Revolution led by the communist People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA). Daoud Khan was known for his progressive policies, his efforts for the improvement of women's rights, his Pashtun nationalism, and for initiating two five-year modernization plans which increased the labor force by about 50 percent.[2] After his overthrow and assassination, Afghanistan plunged into war that since then never ended.[3][4]

Sounds like a terrible guy.

Yeah it was the U.S. and not the fact the guy wanted to distance himself from the USSR and remain neutral.

>In 1978, there was a rift with the PDPA. Internally, Daoud attempted to distance himself from the communist elements within the coup. He was concerned about the tenor of many communists in his government and Afghanistan's growing dependency on the Soviet Union. These moves were highly criticized by Moscow, which feared that Afghanistan would soon become closer to the West, especially the United States;

>Daoud wanted to lessen the country's dependence on the Soviet Union and attempted to promote a new foreign policy. He went to Egypt, India, Saudi Arabia, and Iran for aid. Surprisingly, he did not renew the Pashtunistan agitation; relations with Pakistan improved thanks to interventions from the US and the Shah of Iran. These moves alerted the Soviets.

He was killed because the Soviets were scared and his replacements fucked everything up leading to the invasion.

Just because you were laughably incompetent at it doesn't mean you weren't there for profit.

>foreignpolicy.com
>minimum biased
lol

what is wrong with you? you are the one who knows nothing about afghanistan or about the war, and who waved off the fact that the war was only so terrible and endless because the americans began funneling money and armaments to the fundies.

it makes me sick to my stomach that you would attempt to justify and obfuscate this with 5 minutes of wikipedia reading and some copy+pasting something that destroyed afghanistan and destabilised almost all of the entire muslim world by creating a training ground for jihadis.

>A single punitive airstrike for using an internationally banned warfare tactic is the same thing as a full on invasion

Literally the only thing Trump did wrong is not also applying the same standards to Israel and the Saudis and firing a missile up their asses any time they get caught chimping out on the Palestinians or Yemeni civilians.

Attached: 4F527D47-0B7C-4E51-9B07-CC1635F90682.jpg (286x327, 27K)

In 2030 they will have to finance a coup in their own country

Yeah, and Russia used this as an opportunity to empower communist factions within the rebellious movements and institute communist regimes by having said communist factions come to dominate the rebels.

Believe it or not, the average third world peasant guerrila couldn't care less for some failed 19th century economic theory.

This. Americans just love to draw false equivalences between their imperialism and any other country not being 100% isolationist in it's foreign policy.

>chimping out on the Palestinians or Yemeni civilians.
The whole chemical weapon thing is so blatantly false that the mind boggles. You realize that chemical strikes against children's hospitals are completely tactically worthless and strategically debilitating to your own side, right?

Not a single person in the western governments believes this shit, it's just an excuse for dumb plebs like you.

>Striking fear in your enemy is tactically worthless and strategically debilitating

Lol, nigga this is literally THE go-to strategy that leaders in the Middle East use to control their people. You’ll notice every time the US does something militarily in the ME, the Saudis and Israelis will claim that they control the almighty US and gave the order for it, while everytime the US DOESNT do something, Iran’s Ayatollah or whomever else will say they scared the US from taking action.

you are so clueless it hurts to read

THIS the ussr was based and dindu nuffin

Answer this then. So using chemical weapons makes no sense for Assad, but how does it make as a rebel falseflag either? Obama did nothing in response to the gas videos, and Trump just ordered a one time inconsequential airstrike. Why wouldn’t the rebels at least keep staging more gas attacks to cause more punative strikes, and where did the rebels acquire the chemical weapons anyway? The US? It has a much better track record of keeping dangerous weapons from falling in to the wrong hands than Russia does.

It's time to turn off Fox News, amerifriend

Well, they kinda deserve it... people is having a real bad time up there

undocumented immigrants are being deported here.

All part of the white identifying mestizo super race plan.

We don’t support coups in Europe because their countries aren’t shitty enough to have rebel uprisings vlad.