Why the fuck would anyone invest in NANO? First of all most organizations pay fees not because they want to, but because the fees are a guarantor of security, just like Bitcoin (Core) or Bitcoin [Cash].
It's not like oh hey I want to give u free $ but without the $ there is no security u know? So how does NANO think it can get away with this!!!!!!!!
LOL I know, stupidest coin in the market, been getting smashed down the whole time.
Zachary Evans
why do you type like a nigger
Jayden Martinez
dude why do u gotta use that word. I'm white
James Diaz
fees are to security as aids are to elephants, completely unrelated in every way shape and form. i feel bad for you if you're actually this braindead op
Jaxson Rivera
why would people keep the network security if there is no incentive?
Jonathan Jackson
Because they want to protector their investment. Da
Blake Sanders
wow, this is a struggle to read. i assume you wanted to say "secure," but weren't taught english very well in your Bangalore middle school. that being said, people are not what keeps the network secure, the code behind the coin does, and that's impossible to change and requires no maintenance from humans rajeev.
Evan Morris
>why would people want to keep their network secure Do you realize how stupid you sound you nigger?
Julian Stewart
first of all how can their investment be worth anything to protect without the security to make it worth something in the first place?
I'm using network security as a verb, even though secure also works. The code behind the coin does, then how do we know this code is security?!
Grayson Collins
I am saying people want to keep their network security and the only way to do this is through payment and fees
Zachary Gutierrez
The mano protocolo is secure. If you make a rep you are making it safer, thus protecting your investment. Also exchanges have to make their own reps so every exchange is helping.
Charles Lopez
Ok first of all the coin is called NANO you brainlet.
The reps can also make it less safe! If it is so cheap to make one then someone bad can just make many and then they control the coin!! That's why fees are needed!!!
proof of stake means you need to own a lot of coins to have a say and if you choose to fuck the economy of nano by doing something shady, you could very well see the value of all your own coins drop.
Nolan Ward
Yeah and I'm saying you're wrong you dumbass
Elijah Perez
>mfw this thread at least come up with some serious fud brainlet
Wyatt Gonzalez
ok first of all NANO is not proof of stake and also what if the cost to ruin NANO is in someone's financial interest?! (keep BITCOIN ALIVE)
This is a theory I have developed, not FUD
Austin Stewart
again, at the end of that sentence you should have used 'secure' not 'security'.
"how do we know this code is security" is the same as saying "how do we know this room is heat." you don't say 'heat' in that case, right retard? you say 'hot'.
same thing here. it's not that you're choosing a verb over an adjective, you're simply speaking incorrect gibberish you fucking pajeet.
Jose Hernandez
you could say "heated" which is the equivalent for secure and security.
regardless to be honest maybe I'm not that good at speaking but whatever I do know that fees make incentives for keeping the network secure and right now ur argument isnt winning me over
Sebastian Walker
OP is officially an obsessed psycho ex-girlfriend type. because he lost a shitload of money on NANO he's trying to create weak FUD for it lmfaooo.
Here's his other NANO thread where he admits that he bought high and sold low, you can tell it's him because he's spamming the same stupid shit about "i'd rather have security through fees like BTC"
Nano's a fcking scam. You should have sold when you had the chance. This will never be ATH again.
Hunter Phillips
wrong again. "heated" is not the equivalent of security, it's the equivalent of secured, which would have been correct.
jesus christ you are actually fucking retarded.
Gabriel Ramirez
OK we disagree to disagree then. And nice double dublets
My English language ability sucks but my spatial and physics and math levels are high and I can't see how your argument makes sense
Julian Diaz
a theory is actually based in reality though. you're just a retarded middle-schooler who's literally making something up out of thin air because they lost money and got salty. you have 0 understanding of how security works, this is not a 'theory' it's just unintelligible rambling.
Brandon Robinson
OK if I am a middle schooler how did I lose money then?
And no I have heard the same argument online I just have changed it (not plagiarised just fixed)
Jaxson Jenkins
we don't agree to disagree, you're simply wrong and embarrassing yourself. be thankful this is an anonymous board.
Dominic Allen
These are the exactly posts that I come to Jow Forums for. I love the salt. OP has made several NANO posts today thinking that he can in some way influence the price one way or another. top kek
Just sell the mofo coin already. Buy a shitton of it back in a year, when the crypto bear ends and we are at the bottom. It aint rocket science.
this is anonymous board and I use a proxy you idiot so no that was not me I think lots of pplr upset at nANO because they scammed us sort of
Oliver Myers
this is actually painful at this point. saying you disagree to disagree is the same as saying agree to agree, meaning you implied i agreed with you. seriously, just leave this board and stop spamming the same retarded threads, it's not gonna get you your money back.
Leo Myers
ok obviously you don;t know what youre talking about bro
Jason Clark
AHAHHAHAH it literally couldn't be any more obvious that every thread about 'NANO security' and fees is created by you. it may be an anonymous board but you can't hide your terrible grammar and bizarre way of speaking.
you're actually one of the stupidest and most immature motherfuckers i've ever seen on Jow Forums
Jason Cook
never waste time arguing with braindead nano holders, everyone with half a brain knows nano is going to die
Asher Campbell
I've had a really fun time playing a pajeet to you, you took the bait pretty well desu.
Thanks for playing along though; you're right I did make the other threads. I've been making NANO threads for the past couple of months, gauging sentiment. Lately the sentiment has changed - in the past there was heavy FUD on NANO. I've noticed now that there is some support and realism in these threads (count you as one). I'm not sure though if it's actual belief, or if other bagholders are started to get worried about the overall success of NANO and have stopped FUD'ing their own coin.
Zachary Wright
>gets proven to be a retard >claims to be trolling
pretty much what every 13 year old on the planet says when they've been proven to be a no-life autistic retard. nice try though ;D
Jonathan Adams
haha you got trolled bra look for one of these NANO pics in the future