Literally did nothing wrong

Attached: David_-_Napoleon_crossing_the_Alps_-_Malmaison2.jpg (3394x4134, 1.38M)

he was an autistic warmonger who's responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands

Attached: Screenshot_2018-09-13 Napoleonic Wars - Wikipedia.png (321x395, 20K)

He lost in Russia and Waterloo. This is wrong.

Nah coalitions started it, he was just defending the values of revolution. Well reinstituting slavery was kinda bad I'll give you that.

France started the conflict by declaring war on the HRE in 1792.

>he was just defending the values of revolution
By trying to start a monarchy of his own by installing his son as emperor?

monarchy != imperium

Next you'll be telling me that Augustus started a monarchy smdh

>monarchy != imperium
In the end the differences are meaningless.
To say he has defending the values of revolution is still fucking nonsense. He was simply taking power for himself.

He put the HRE out of its misery
its was a bureaucratic feudalistic mess

>He was simply taking power for himself.
The people voted by referendum for him to become emperor, he imposed nothing.

>he imposed nothing.
The guy in charge of the largest army in the world imposed nothing? Okay.

Attached: 0e3.gif (320x214, 2.66M)

he would have put the Ottoman empire out if its misery as well and would have created a much more effective system of goverment that would ally with France
but the Eternal Anglo to defend the ottoman empire

The french empire was more democratic that the UK has ever been.

Attached: Constitution_an_VIII_et_le_Empire_Francais.png (988x759, 47K)

Oh yes, of course.

Attached: 1530892639543.jpg (640x480, 85K)

When was the queen elected?

When's the last time she mattered?

>France started the conflict by declaring war on the HRE in 1792.

Factually true, but you need to put this in the context : Prussia and Austria threatened to militarily intervene if the (french) king's situation was not return to pre-revolution.

How much public funds does she use each year for doing absolutely nothing, and living like a billionaire?

A good bit less than she brings in via tourism.

t. cuck

Attached: Capture.png (727x628, 648K)

b-but muh tourist revenues

69p how will I live without it
Even without her the government would still be paying to maintain the royal buildings under English heritage

You're paying for the whole family expenses and you can't even approach them too closely without getting shot by security services... kek

I argue that Napoleon did not lose in Russia
Russia knocked aside the chessboard like a petulant child

To be honest, Napoleon could have had his decisive victory at Borodino but he was too arrogant and didn't wanted to commit the imperial guard and this was a mistake.

Imposing a completely foreign system on people who don't want it is always wrong. Napoleon forced democracy, civil rights, religious freedom, representative government and secular laws on tens of nations that didn't want them. Maybe they were good for French fedorafags but for nobody else. Austria didn't want them. Russia didn't want them. We didn't want them. Of course it ended for him as well as Soviet socialism in Afghanistan or American liberal democracy in Iraq.

>The people voted by referendum for him to become emperor, he imposed nothing.
The comments above you were talking about his son, whom no one voted for and napoleon absolutely did try to impose on France.
Read a book, nigga.