A bridge crossing Bering Strait: YES OR NO?

A bridge crossing Bering Strait: YES OR NO?

Attached: imag016[1].jpg (433x302, 26K)

one day

For what purpose?

I like railways and trains. But railways do need maintenance on a regular basis. So, I wonder if it's practical to build railways in such a large scale.

Makes chinese invasion of America a lot easier.

It would be a gimmick.

The channel tunnel works fine and is about half the length of a bering tunnel (50km). I think you have some pretty long rail tunnels in your own country as well.

after Gibraltar bridge maybe

Attached: Picture28.jpg (640x364, 94K)

Yes! We need to make the crossing easier

Attached: 11532436478.png (644x800, 15K)

this is most dumbest plan I've ever seen, there's no room to make route on the Japan for additional rail for big scale like OP.

Cheaper alternative to transport goods and the local community living at the extreme north will finally have cheap grocery products, that means the towns like Petropavlovsk, Barrow, Anchorage, Yellowknife, Anadyr etc. will finally get to see life in their community.

those water are too perilous to construct a bridge, and we don't need easy access to our continent for r*ssians

None of those towns would be revitalized by a railway. Anchorage has no need of it, since it's already a major shipping town by air and sea.

I can't decipher this post, but are you aware you have a 53km undersea tunnel to hokkaido? A connection to sakhalin island isn't that much longer.

No, we don't need illegal Russian immigrants.

Ummmm isn't it already connected to Spain?

have you checked my whole railways in Japan? guess whether if we make budgets on additional management of international route

Easier military invasion

You can just use the Shinkansen for Japan

Building a tunnel between two islands owned by Japan, or a tunnel between two members of the EU, is vastly different from building a tunnel just south of the arctic circle between two countries that are relatively hostile to each other.

These types of projects are paid by tolls from freight and passenger traffic. We have a lot of bridges to america subsidized in this way.

I feel that the biggest problem in this case would be no the bridge itself, but the fact that the route goes through Siberia and Alaska/Northern Canada. Not the best climate for mass transit.

>These types of projects are paid by tolls from freight and passenger traffic.
and you say it's solved by Airplanes. no use to make channels.

car trip from Lisbon to Buenos Aires would be cool

Air freight is vastly more expensive than rail freight though. Rail is the most efficient freight mode that exists, although the initial infrastructure cost can be high. Sea freight is somewhere in between so it's good enough for current economics.

Attached: serveimage (25).jpg (620x465, 223K)

no