What did americans mean by this

What did americans mean by this

Attached: Screenshot_2018-09-17-14-50-52-1.png (1201x720, 568K)

go back to Jow Forums you cringy racebaiting faggot, and take your pathetic “le epic redpill” attempt with you

...

Americans are huge faggots
what's new?

don't let them amerikeks. they already got the coasts don't let them take the midwest and northeast too

why do Americans want to be like Brazil everywhere in the country, aren't we enough proof of this mistake?

Good I hate wh*tes

No you are not white. No you are not European. Yes you are Indian. Yes you have black blood. Yes you are Brazilian. Yes you are Latino.

94% of wh*tes is too much, 56% is perfection however

God damnit the way headlines are written these days triggers me so badly. The New York Times is doing this shit too now? A major newspaper and not some retarded blogger or inconsequential newspaper? This semen slurping world isnt for me

Attached: 1536909055176.jpg (898x522, 65K)

White guilt.

People should stop feeling guilty

This only happens in america to be frank. The whole "white ppl vs black ppl" argument and philosophy decays pretty quickly outside your borders.

This isn't an easy place for most non-whites to live, that would be bad for everybody

Attached: 1503851134532.jpg (3264x1836, 548K)

It has a lot to do with slavery

Oh I know. There are people whose families came here long after slavery was abolished and/or live in states that fought for the union but they're still racist pieces of shit.
It's basically extortion at this point. It isn't helping things either. This pseudo equality is brewing more racism

94% american white
really its somewhere 70-80%

>theyre still racist pieces of shit
To clarify i meant in the eyes of this situation. They are guilty even if they werent here because they are white

Serves you right dumb, yank.

I always found it amusing that the "black people" label include plenty of people that are in fact genetically majority European. If people simply stopped thinking in terms of arbitrary groups then a lot of problems would magically vanish over night. But of course that will never happen.

The New York Times is shit-tier, where have you been?

How does shit like that not get called out for anti-white racism?

one of the two major political parties believes you literally can not be racist to white people

>a mainstream publication in your country is making overt calls for ethnic replacement
>g-go back to Jow Forums cringelord, you're embarrassing me in front of the Europeans

Attached: 1498334696986.jpg (900x1211, 124K)

uhhhh you ever read up on boer history lmao

upvoted my fellow MAGApedes

>Haha, t-that'll get 'em!

American history is pretty much non existent in our textbooks a part from the chapter where you basically grinded our country to rubble during ww2.

Profound post

He's talking about Apartheid in southern Africa

>italian education

up
voted

Why should we care about your history, as much as you've probably got just a footnote about italian history in yours.
History is local.

i believe you
because they're a superpower,do you not learn about alexander,persians,mongols etc. in italy?

Local as in european centered not just inside the borders, so yeah.

yeah and the US is relevant to us

Not really history anymore everything that happened during the last 70 years.

Literally clickbait. It's funny how much influence google has on the quality of the press through their ads.

>upset mutt that he is called out for being a Jewish puppet
Pathetic

Rude AF

Mutts truely are an amazing species

>Most black americans have some relation to the slave owners
>Most white americans are descended from immigrants who arrived after abolition

>blacks stopped arriving after the civil war
>European migration dramatically increased
>in any case only the upperclass owned slaves but regularly fugged them
Dunno what's so hard to understand, this isn't a contradiction.