Were Celts the niggers of Europe? They didn't really accomplish anything worthy of note...

Were Celts the niggers of Europe? They didn't really accomplish anything worthy of note, were primarily known for being savages, and were eventually subdued by more advanced peoples.

Attached: 10-facts-ancient-celts-warriors-min-770x437.jpg (770x437, 74K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runes
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>by more advanced peoples.

or more savage, i.e the Germans

I remove what I've said, Celts were more savages but just weaker.

They were shit tier among indo-niggers

Woden and Donner were not on the side of the Celts.

Celto-Germanic countries created the modern world though...

Attached: 1526502469021.jpg (575x323, 34K)

wrong place, wrong time, squashed on all sides by Romans and g*Rmanoids

Attached: 1532095381422.png (377x325, 246K)

on helleno latin foundations

>Celto-Germanic countries
modern cucks

ancient cucks

you dont know shit about antiquity do you

and ruined it then

>Celto-Germanic countries created the modern world though...
Even worse. Thanks for nothing, assholes

The Celts almost destroyed the Roman Republic, y u dum op

Its all a wheel, one day you're on top then you're not

Attached: Woe to the Vanquished.jpg (1032x1400, 217K)

When it was a village.

Attached: gauled.png (500x833, 221K)

I think Celts were R1b Slavs who were unlucky to go westward instead of eastward and stumbled upon Germanics who quickly subjugated and assimilated them, whereas Slavs went eastward, colonized uninhabited lands, multiplied like rabbits and thus survived.

t h i c c

modern descendants of Celts include for example Icelanders

Celtic women were taken from Celtic Isles in Britain in the year 1000 and taken to Iceland by Norwegian males

This way Icelanders were born, very few founding mothers of Icelanders were true Norwegians and even fever were Finns, they were almost fully Celtic

Eh.
Vestlandet and up to ~Trondheim area from the west was where most of the Icelanders came from, and you can see on most maps that western Norwegians have a slightly different genetic composition than the rest of Scandinavia.

>Were Celts the niggers of Europe?
No. They invented soap, which literally puts them far ahead of any negro.

They would never have had writing or cities without the Latins.

>WE

WUZ ROMANS

After ruining it and stucking us in darkness for centuries, just for Latins to recoger everything again un the renassaince

wrong
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runes

Attached: Heuneburg.jpg (1280x720, 223K)

>The runes developed centuries after the Old Italic alphabets from which they are probably historically derived\
>The historical context of the script's origin is the cultural contact between Germanic people, who often served as mercenaries in the Roman army, and the Italian peninsula during the Roman imperial period (1st century BC to 5th century AD)
So in other words...the Latins gave them their alphabet

Most western Europeans have at least some Celtic blood in them. French, Spanish, English and Portuguese have a sizable amount.

Although I agree pure celts like the catholic Irish are worthless.

Somebody else already pointed out that runes stemmed from the Latin alphabet, so I'll just say
>that
>a city
literally Great Zimbabwe tier

unironically celts were more advanced. celtic villages had stone walls and celts had mail armor, they actually might have invented it.
but sissy celts got carabogad by germans.

@to clarify I mean the the gaulish celts not the savages of the british isles.

Why is it always the mutts, every time? Without exceptions?
Did THAT many wogs emigrate to the US?