Scientific publications per capita.
Notice anything?
Scientific publications per capita.
Notice anything?
Other urls found in this thread:
princeton.edu
scholar.harvard.edu
academia.stackexchange.com
web.archive.org
twitter.com
yeah, 10-50 has the same color than
Here's a hint..
Yes,we suck.
Thanks
Yes, the bizarre projection of the map.
Western Civilization
Germanics are the superior race.
Why is 99% white Russia performing so badly then?
It's Germanic superiority. White itself is too broad of a category.
Europeans lie the most per capita
Yeah. This map is completely meaningless in the modern age. There's no quality-control and 99% of these papers arent cited once
You need a better monitor m8
t. 1440p IPS master-race
Are you suggesting that if I convert to protestantism my hair will turn blond?
Underdeveloped countries which suffered centuries from white men's explitation capitalism imperialism sexism racism like Finland, Haiti and Afghanistan are not doing so well.
Maybe a paper should be cited at least twice (and none by the authors) to count?
Yes, intellectual colonization by western nations.
Richest countries have more money to invest?
And a LOT of scientists in North Europe and USA are from China, índia, Rússia, Brazil etc. Biggest neuroscientist in the world is a brazilian named Miguel Nicolelis and He works in the Duke uni.
What I notice is the brain drain that has been affecting Italy lately.
That would be much more meaningful
Also I notice that murricans really are triggered by the concept of not being number one or that their "muh scientific stronghold" is really based on other countries scientists
I have a friend in the Boston Uni. and she has sair that 90% of people in her lab. are from emergent countries, most from Índia China and Latam
You could triggered a lot of people with that comment.
I heard Italian academia is really channing fir the lack if a better word.
Isn't that what maps which try to preserve the scale through the whole globe look like? (as opposed to making africa and south america for example smaller)
Notice how Jow Forums ignores my images. Just shows how long gone our population is on believing the obvious truth. The cognitive dissonance of you fucks is insane.
Literally you.
I won't read that pic but I think most of int/, well, the Western people at least, are agree with you
Fuck off. we've already established that OPs map doesnt tell us anything meaningful other than how dysfunctional the academic system has become in blue countries
Rushton actually thinks melanin makes you more hornier and that penis suze directly correlates with iq.
He's an actual academic shitposter
Based.
not an argument.
why should anyone care to respond to gish galloping? It makes any discussion completely impenetrable. Stick to one thing.
Prove him wrong
>other countries scientists
They move here and become Americans just like the rest of us did because their home countries don't offer enough opportunity.
You dicks just like to mock "muh heritage" until somebody does something impressive, and then suddenly they "Italian" or "German" again.
>muh nation of immigrants
Look up immigration act of 1965. You were legislatively white nationalist before that happened.
>In a series of experiments, the researchers found that pressing financial concerns had an immediate impact on the ability of low-income individuals to perform on common cognitive and logic tests. On average, a person preoccupied with money problems exhibited a drop in cognitive function similar to a 13-point dip in IQ, or the loss of an entire night’s sleep.
>But when their concerns were benign, low-income individuals performed competently, at a similar level to people who were well off, said corresponding author Jiaying Zhao, who conducted the study as a doctoral student in the lab of co-author Eldar Shafir, Princeton’s William Stewart Tod Professor of Psychology and Public Affairs. Zhao and Shafir worked with Anandi Mani, an associate professor of economics at the University of Warwick in Britain, and Sendhil Mullainathan, a Harvard University economics professor.
>To better gauge the influence of poverty in natural contexts, between 2010 and 2011 the researchers also tested 464 sugarcane farmers in India who rely on the annual harvest for at least 60 percent of their income. Because sugarcane harvests occur once a year, these are farmers who find themselves rich after harvest and poor before it. Each farmer was given the same tests before and after the harvest, and performed better on both tests post-harvest compared to pre-harvest.
princeton.edu
Jow Forums eternally, irrevocably btfo
You find the studies online and make up your mind about their credibility. To me, for the most part, they seem credible enough. It's safe to assume that aboriginals and Japanese aren't exactly the same when it comes to their innate mental capabilities but further research is needed.
there is a didfference between 1000th gen 1/10th germans and those who move to US after growing in germany you know?
Now do the same test on Africans.
>Miguel Nicolelis
>biggest neuroscientist
No. There is no "biggest neuroscientist" in the world.
>Each farmer was given the same tests before and after the harvest, and performed better on both tests post-harvest compared to pre-harvest
the SAME test?
Fine, pay for my studies in the university of Princeton and I will
As I recall after looking into this topic the difference between white and black stands at about three iq points that at the moment can not possibly be attributed to anything else than genetics. The science in this is still in its infancy and not much can be said for sure about what genes predict intelligence. the very low numbers for subsaharan africa every time come from one unreliable source: Richard Lynn. Otherwise it appears as subsaharan africa doesn't differ significantly from nearby third world countries.
You're a fucking idiot, a test with the same standard. You mongrel. You negative IQ terroni. Crawl back to the inferno with Dante.
>three iq points
You mean fifteen. It's in the double digits and every tests shows this.
don't bully me spen we were supposed to be med brothers.
Also it doesn't say how many did well, all of them? That's weird even if the theory behind the article is found to be completely true.
no, I mean three. read again, 'the difference between white and black stands at about three iq points that at the moment can not possibly be attributed to anything else than genetics'. The science on this is not as clear cut as you would like, there is room for interpretation and alternate possibilities.
Post proof than cuck. Because black IQ is 85 and white IQ is 100. Every fucking test shows this.
That's not the actual paper. If you feel like reading it, ecco: scholar.harvard.edu
>every tests shows this
What tests?
There is the test done by some fraud (Richard Lynn) and there is a test that extrapolates PISA scores (grades) to IQ scores. Both are dubious sources.
Don't try to reason with Jow Forumstards
>PISA scores
>dubious source
Are you joking right now? PISA is a pretty good determinant of a country's average IQ just so you know.
russia is smaller than africa
See the myth 5
>singapore
>hong kong
>japan
>macao
>estonia
>china
>canada
>finland
>korea
arr rook same to me
I just posted a link to a study that proves that poverty causes a 13 point drop, you absolute mongrel
You dumb white subhuman
PISA scores are based on reading, writing and mathematical and scientific questions. Those qualities are inluenced by environment and quality of education. Not by genetics.
Nope, your genetics determine how efficiently you are able to perform those tasks, Mohammed.
And he posted an infographic that immediately disproves your study, retard.
see this is another thing. If one wants to find actual genetic links to intelligence it would be much more helpful to divide people up into groups of genetic frequency for example. Much more useful categorization than race to look for genes and also for if you want to get rid of any possible environmental factors polluting the validity of any research.
And you didn't even bother to look at the studies in myth 5. Sad!
What, you mean that growing up in a country where you have the time and the books you want would make you better at reading? You delusional communist!
What if.... absence of intelligence causes poverty?
Go eat crayons with your white genius friends from Poland and other white shitholes.
Thanks! (But i am not that retarded, did notice that wasn't the paper)
>The farmers perform noticeably better at the test after being paid
>YOU'RE POOR CUZ U DUMB
Objectively wrong.
The Saudi's are so rich because of their high intelligence. Good point.
13 points is only one sd. Nearly ever iq test has Africans in the retard category ie > 2 sd below average
slavs and southroners are dumb monkey niggers. protestants are literally superhuman
You just didn't come up with anything did you?
Just admit it, IQ is about 80% genetic according to twin studies (height being 70% in contrast) and the primary reason why the difference between races is so persistent universally even in the same income groups.
Google up the many critics if his shitty papers and statistics.
One dubious IQ test and an extrapolation, you mean
>Notice anything?
Yeah, a completely awful map projection.
>one
>Just admit it, IQ is about 80% genetic
Huh? where di this come from? Especially when there is such a huge margin of IQ where two people of the same race (or even same family, but let's nto make baeseless claims) can fall?
what's new?
>Nearly ever iq test
[citation needed]
The only tests you subhumans are citing were done by a fraud (Lynn) or """based""" on PISA scores.
These lovely IQ maps you see floating around the chinz so much are based on Lynn's bullshit, which has been accused by actual scientists of "disregarding scientific objectivity", "misrepresenting data" (web.archive.org
I actually have no stakes in this so I wouldn't care, what I'm seeing here is nothing new and the more I look into the topic the less clear cut this all becomes. That's the main message I want to bring forth, it could be genetically determined for 10 points for all I care, but that is far from certain at this point, so I'm not really taking a hard line opposing side to whatever you're saying because I prefer to wait the science out some more first because this field has growing academic interest right now.
Kys nigger
sure sure
My bad, it's actually a bit less (70%, see identical twins reared apart)
The science is already out there, just not on a "molecular level", but the evidence is strong enough to make conclusions
>this field has growing academic interest right now
Racial differences in intelligence and personality? You fucking kidding me? Not in a million years.
>The science is already out there, just not on a "molecular level", but the evidence is strong enough to make conclusions
I wholeheartedly disagree
>Racial differences in intelligence and personality? You fucking kidding me? Not in a million years.
more like genetic influences on all aspects that influence quality of life, which includes IQ.
Slavs aren't white
>Kys nigger
No my country's AIDS rates are not as high as the superior WHITE Russians.
I believe in you user. You can do it
Russia is the only country where "Race and IQ" is """science""" and not pseudoscience.
How is Uruguay so low? I thought it was relatively nice there
Kill yourself white boy. Join your suicidal AIDS-infected friends in Russia.