That's it

I can no longer tell if LINK is the real deal or not. The memes have finally got to me.

Attached: download (1).jpg (223x226, 6K)

excellent

Attached: excellent.jpg (480x360, 16K)

>green id
Consider that a sign.

It's a token, therefore it is useless, tokenization works only for things with intrinsic value such as real estate, stocks and derivatives. You could pay nodes with Ethereum, the chainlink token is useless and the tokens on ETH right now are all just a way of fundraising with a horrible function

you can't pay nodes with ETH. this has already been confirmed. nodes will accept LINK only.

Chain Link was fools gold.
Only used to gather some tens of millions for the 'devs'.
The team will mind their side projects and let CL die of natural causes aka low volume, delisting, etc. They never said anything to bag holders untill now and will continue to do so. Why not ?
Linktards will continue to connect invisible dots untill autumn when it will be clear the project died a long tine ago.
Then back to shilling the next scam.

>looks at sergey business history
>failure
>failure
>failure
>...
>but chainlink will succeed !

forced meme by oldfags
the ico contribution address got shared here
2+2=4
go figure it out pajeet

Is there some intrinsic reason you couldn't create an identical system that received Eth? Or is receiving Link inherent in the process?

its a FAT meme

>>looks at sergey business history
>>failure
>>failure
>>failure
>>...
>>but chainlink will succeed !

It is literally impossible to manage a programming team without being a programmer yourself.

99.9% of all tech start up are lead by programmers or at least engineers.

sergey is a simpleton philosopher that just scammed his way to riches.

FAT FAT FAT

>peter thiel
>evan spiegal
>steve jobs
nice low iq post

It has been up until now a 'promising project'.

However this failure to achieve the patent is a red flag for me. They seemed to have gone with decent lawyers who obviously didn't convince Sergey otherwise against this waste of resources and money (or maybe he just didn't listen!)

Did they SERIOUSLY expect to patent the term 'SmartContract' ? A term that any crypto puddlebrain knows Nick Szabo coined over 20 years ago. Did Mark Oblad, the legal mastermind of smart contracts decide not to scratch his Dr Evil fucking head and halt Sergey from making this terrible move.

Also did you see the state of the fucking attachments in the application? Minimal fucking effort..... It was just screenshots of Crypto Geek.com and the SC.com website with a few duplications. The lack of effort is unbelievable for a project who prides itself on being for a 'corporate' audience. Another red flag. Of course the judge denied it.

Watch how embarrassing this episode will become as the wider Ethereum and crypto communities find out about it. As if the token wasn't a laughing stock already, every other crypto will be mispelling Smart Contract as smartcontract just to rub it in the faces of Link bag holders.

I mean is he going to try and patent 'cryptocurrencies' next?! or what about fucking 'cheeseburgers'?! At his best he is hopeful at his least he is naive and distracted as a leader.

We have visibility from github that Steve and Dimitri are working there butts off (Until the past few days). Put them in charge! It might give the project a better chance, they at least have some apparent useful skills, and the linkpool.io guys said on reddit that theyare very impressed with how Steve operates. (Didn't mention Serge)

I am a Link bag holder btw but I'm getting out at the next pump, this was one naive business decision at the end of a long list since Sergey decided to run his own businesses.

Attached: Pad 2.jpg (600x825, 356K)

you could easily program it to accept ETH, the token is useless.

excellent fud still not selling

being a philosophy major don't mean shit in tech industry, if you was a part you'd know pajeet

Thanks. I spent 10 minutes writing it and I can't really fault anything I've written apart from a few typos.

didn't read, shit picture

Attached: 988.jpg (1020x1020, 744K)

Polite reminder to buy more LINK when the FUD runs rampant!

>99.9% of all tech start up are lead by programmers or at least engineers.

You really need a reality check boy

Thanks for the OC. Got this for you:

HAHAH Based Moderator.

Thanks for doing it for free!

Attached: Agnostic.png (722x573, 371K)

cmon dude nobody believed this was srs

Losers have capitulated and are now angry/depressed, time for a new market cycle. For those with strong hands who plan to keep holding, we'll meet on the moon EOY.

I'm scared, please tell me it will be okay

Attached: 1526611369939.jpg (1439x1374, 132K)

literally FUD

>DURRRRR WHY WOULD ANYONE USE BITCONE U COULD JUST FORK IT AND USE UR OWN LOL. IS OPEN SOURCE. JUST FORK AND PREMINE IT LOL BITCONE IS GONNA GO TO ZERO HAHA RETARDS

we haven't capitulated by far, what do you think of all the january buyers 2017? Lots of people entered early 2017 (march/june). We're going to like atleast 800$

Link is blockchain agnostic so the token is necessary.

Not an argument, see BTC actually has a brand name and is recognized all over the world. Link however is just a fundraising token and doesn't hold any value, its just NEETs praying they will become rich on it. Link is a shitcoin erc223 token nothing more it doesn't do anything.

All these erc20 tokens are just ways for projects to fundraise, they don't hold any value nor will they ever.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>erc223

nice fud