It's not even about accumulation anymore. People are fudding for no reason now. It's gone too far, they've likely tarnished the reputation of this project forever. It's not going to stop at mainnet either. It will keep happening because retards think it's funny to recycle the same garbage and pasta over and over. You've killed the first mover advantage and have destined this project to go nowhere. Link will never be picked up outside of biz. Every time it's mentioned anywhere else retards flood with bullshit fud. And don't go on about how it only needs institutional adoption because that isn't true. Massive gains like Eth came from normie fomo. You've probably ruined Link for good.
The FUD is killing Link
Dominic Thomas
Other urls found in this thread:
blogs.wsj.com
twitter.com
Hunter Young
Nathaniel Nelson
FAT
A
T
Jose Brown
Mission Accomplished!
Anthony Phillips
It has been up until now a 'promising project'.
However this failure to achieve the trademark is a red flag for me. They seemed to have gone with decent lawyers who obviously didn't convince Sergey otherwise against this waste of resources and money (or maybe he just didn't listen!)
Did they SERIOUSLY expect to trademark the term 'SmartContract' ? A term that any crypto puddlebrain knows Nick Szabo coined over 20 years ago. Did Mark Oblad, the legal mastermind of smart contracts decide not to scratch his Dr Evil fucking head and halt Sergey from making this terrible move.
Also did you see the state of the fucking attachments in the application? Minimal fucking effort..... It was just screenshots of Crypto Geek.com and the SC.com website with a few duplications. The lack of effort is unbelievable for a project who prides itself on being for a 'corporate' audience. Another red flag. Of course the judge denied it.
Watch how embarrassing this episode will become as the wider Ethereum and crypto communities find out about it. As if the token wasn't a laughing stock already, every other crypto will be mispelling Smart Contract as smartcontract just to rub it in the faces of Link bag holders.
I mean is he going to try and trademark 'cryptocurrencies' next?! or what about fucking 'cheeseburgers'?! At his best he is hopeful at his least he is naive and distracted as a leader.
We have visibility from github that Steve and Dimitri are working there butts off (Until the past few days). Put them in charge! It might give the project a better chance, they at least have some apparent useful skills, and the linkpool.io guys said on reddit that theyare very impressed with how Steve operates. (Didn't mention Serge)
I am a Link bag holder btw but I'm getting out at the next pump, this was one naive business decision at the end of a long list since Sergey decided to run his own businesses.
Nolan Rodriguez
It has been up until now a 'promising project'.
However this failure to achieve the trademark is a red flag for me. They seemed to have gone with decent lawyers who obviously didn't convince Sergey otherwise against this waste of resources and money (or maybe he just didn't listen!)
Did they SERIOUSLY expect to trademark the term 'SmartContract' ? A term that any crypto puddlebrain knows Nick Szabo coined over 20 years ago. Did Mark Oblad, the legal mastermind of smart contracts decide not to scratch his Dr Evil fucking head and halt Sergey from making this terrible move.
Also did you see the state of the fucking attachments in the application? Minimal fucking effort..... It was just screenshots of Crypto Geek.com and the SC.com website with a few duplications. The lack of effort is unbelievable for a project who prides itself on being for a 'corporate' audience. Another red flag. Of course the judge denied it.
Watch how embarrassing this episode will become as the wider Ethereum and crypto communities find out about it. As if the token wasn't a laughing stock already, every other crypto will be mispelling Smart Contract as smartcontract just to rub it in the faces of Link bag holders.
I mean is he going to try and trademark 'cryptocurrencies' next?! or what about fucking 'cheeseburgers'?! At his best he is hopeful at his least he is naive and distracted as a leader.
We have visibility from github that Steve and Dimitri are working there butts off (Until the past few days). Put them in charge! It might give the project a better chance, they at least have some apparent useful skills, and the linkpool.io guys said on reddit that theyare very impressed with how Steve operates. (Didn't mention Serge)
I am a Link bag holder btw but I'm getting out at the next pump, this was one naive business decision at the end of a long list since Sergey decided to run his own businesses.
Ian Mitchell
HOLD STRONG MARINES
Camden Reyes
>link needs normies, hurr durr
what are institutional node operators?
What is mainstream f5000 adoption of smartcontracts ALL using link as the oracle solution?
Why are you such a weak handed faggot?
Why do you deserve to get rich off of this once in an age opportunity?
You don't.
Noah Young
In the beginning the ChainLink FUD was fun. Flushing toilets and big macs. I laughed because there wasn't a whole lot going on. Now the LINK FUD is downright malicious. You autists are fucking desperate to keep people from buying. It's not fun anymore. It's just sad and pathetic to see so many of you at your wits end trying to keep this from being bought. You spend all your time copying and pasting the same shit in a hundred different threads a day red eyed and frantic. You probably haven't been outside in months and have lost all sense of reality.
Jordan Russell
>I AM EMBARASS N WIL SELL ALL LINK BCUZ