Itt: coins that are actually revolutionary and have real use cases

Attached: PONZI.jpg (964x995, 412K)

I'm not sure anyone would want to pay very much for a high-latency utterly-slow connection.

Yet there are huge costs involved setting up the mesh network now + a connection to a real ISP, dependency on inter-continental fiber installment and shitty adoption that barely goes up.

Literally an old idea that never took of and had brilliant implementations, behind a ponzi scheme with professional paid web template and advertising.

Attached: file.png (614x20, 3K)

Get out Delphi. OUT!

1) it's not slow, aggregates bandwidth from multiple sources
2) it's lower latency than tcp/ip because of the routing protocol
3) it never took off because the necessary hardware was to expensive, now it isn't (IE the "8x raspberry pi" fud is actually proof of why meshnet will work now)

in a couple years you wish you had bothered to learn instead of assuming you already had all the answers

Are you fucking retarded including skycoin with those other three? Like we don’t see what you are trying.

you're right, it should just be skycoin, which will absorb the use cases of the other three.

Lol Skycoin gives me exactly the same feeling like BTC back in the day

Really? It gives me the feeling of Bitconnect or Confido.

Lol you have to be fucking retarded to compare SKY to Bitconect/Confido instead of BTC/ETH. Have you even done your research? You probably hold Link you fucking incel

Unironically Tron TRX

>BTC: brought digital currency to mainstream
Kek.

youtube.com/watch?v=aUgL-4fx2JE

Attached: 1510878957320.jpg (236x248, 16K)

Literally 0 counter arguments.

Skycoin has no future. They want to create a wireless internet but all frequencies are already in use and they need a license for each region where they put one of their nodes. They won't broadcast shit

there would have to be something to argue against for that to be possible

congratulations on being "not even wrong"

>1) it's not slow, aggregates bandwidth from multiple sources
>2) it's lower latency than tcp/ip because of the routing protocol
None of this makes any sense. If you're still using an ISP's infrastructure then all you're doing is adding extra steps. You're forcing traffic to take detours to these Skywire nodes. Unless you're putting your own wires in the ground this will be nothing more than a VPN.

>I have done no research on the project I'm critiquing
Yeah, I know.

>1) it's not slow, aggregates bandwidth from multiple sources
>2) it's lower latency than tcp/ip because of the routing protocol
Do you even know what you're saying here?

no this is an obvious sky shill thread kek

Iota

xsn: invented tpos

1) it treats bandwidth similar to torrents. if you gave skyminers to your two neighbors (even rural people have 2 neighbors within the >10km range of the unidirectional antenna they're building), each of you will be able to use each others extra bandwithdth when needed. anyone can set up an LLC and rent fiber or colocation and broadcast over skywire to any peers within range. The antenna are mechatronic and can retarget as requested by the software. so your LLC can change who each antenna broadcasts to in under a minute, with no human intervention. the possitbilities go on. I'm not getting paid to write this (other than through appreciation of my own holdings, obviously) or I would continue.
2)The TCP/IP handshake requires two trips before your data is even sent. Even as a VPN over legacy infrastructure, skywire is faster because a TCP/IP vpn will add trips. skywire authenticates via key pairs and the network forwards each packet to the desired public key without any extra communication needed. the routing information for public keys will be stored distributed and on DNS-type servers and updated in parallel to any connections you make. Even if your target goes offline, the data will get there when it comes back online, barring some huge blackout that affects all surrounding nodes. skywire works over insane latencies (seconds, minutes, hours, etc) and low bandwith, but it also finds the fastest route (if you've ever run tracert on a cable connection you know how much room there is for improvement) and can take an unlimited number of paths for chunked data to reach total speeds higher than any individual path is capable of, much like torrenting.

obviously you've already made your mind up and will only see things that support your perspective. have fun with that.

Attached: syscoin_amazon_2.png (1256x1120, 809K)

Attached: 87865787689.png (1435x545, 14K)

hey where'd you go user? was looking forward to your counter

>1)
This just adds latency, and their combined bandwidth doesn't do anything for me because my traffic can only go as fast as the slowest link between me and the destination, which is probably my link to the ISP. These Skyminers are just routers in peoples houses, at the edge, away from the ISP/internet backbone. So to get to the destination using Skywire my ISP needs to route my traffic to a Skyminer in someones house somewhere, and then that Skyminer needs to route that traffic through their ISP to another Skyminer in some other house somewhere, and so on and so forth. There's no reason why Skywire wouldn't be slower.

>2)The TCP/IP handshake requires two trips before your data is even sent. Even as a VPN over legacy infrastructure, skywire is faster because a TCP/IP vpn will add trips.
Skywire won't be removing TCP, which handles the three way handshake, at least I don't think so. I don't see why they would. The whitepaper isn't really clear. So they say they'll be using MPLS to route. I don't see how Skyminers are going to coordinate this with ISPs, so they'll have to use IP and put the MPLS header behind the IP header, I guess.

>no this is an obvious sky shill thread kek
It's pretty funny. Sorry OP, this thread is about Holo now.

Attached: holochain.jpg (400x400, 25K)

1) it goes through those connections AND your ISP connection, in the piggyback phase. each connection will be limited by the slowest link, obviously, but the sum will not. In bandwidth aggregation mode your ISP does not communicate between skywire nodes, the nodes communicate directly from your computer and then the traffic reaches the destination through each route provided.
2)compared to a TCP/IP VPN (lets compare apples to apples now), skywire VPN will be faster, given that the base (non-VPN) routing will be the same. In this phase the skywire packets nest inside of TCP headers, yes. When the skywire infracstracture matures, it WILL NOT need any ISP co-operation. the only ISP needed will be running skywire. for the first few years this will only be possible in big cities, but I'm betting it will be robust in cities like san francisco by the end of 2019, if not sooner. There's a company ready to set up a skywire ISP in san francisco as soon as he can get enough hardware. I'm sure there's many more elsewhere. I'm baking up plans to do something similar locally, and i know many other people are as well.

Skywire isn't gonna make ISPs go away, it's going to make ISPs run Skywire because it's the economic choice. It's going to make cable ISPs go away, that's for damn sure.

You should try asking questions about new/unknown things instead of asserting your ignorance as an objective limitation.

and yes, skywire WILL remove TCP/IP, because it's a shit 30+ year old obsolete protocol

I love holo

Not as much as you will later.

Why is monero better than verge?