MAINSTREAM ADOPTION!!!!!!!!

HUNDO EOY

The pendind bit is not

>continue ze doomp

Yeah it was
We’re at 3372 burnt right now

I have only 17500 linkies and i'm going to sell 5000 and buy req

Good idea?

Attached: 2345345345345.jpg (492x624, 53K)

500 MORE PENDING!
WERE GONNA BE ON PLUTO EOY

It's still happening! Burn this fucker down!

Attached: req.jpg (1580x618, 98K)

Nobody knows why this is even happening. For all we know a guy could be sending his tokens to the burner address for the lolz.

Reddit talked about that earlier today
But I doubt they’d burn this much money for the fuck of it

lolwtf I literally just got into REQ like 15 minutes ago. you're welcome, I guess.

Coinbase is now running live tests prior to release.

Oh fuck, it is real. Over 500k pending now.

Nooooooooooo my REQS are burned!!!

Oh my god
300mil pending
It’s fuckigg happening

1billion pending now , RIP REqQ

>inb4 devs fucked up and they are burning whole req supply accidentally

Could you explain to a brainlet what exactly is token burning why is it good and why are you fags sperging?

Lower supply with the same or higher demand equals higher price
Basic economics user

Supply and demand nigger wtf is wrong with you.

When there are fewer tokens available the price per token generally goes up.

etherscan.io/address/0xfcb4393e7faef06fab01c00d67c1895545aff3b8

Somebody analyze the burner contract and figure out what is going on. This can’t be just fee processing, that’s like 700 dollars in fees and at a .5% fee that’s around $140,000 in transaction volume on the last two hours? I don’t think so, somebody (or a group) must be sending their tokens to the burner contract lmao.

Coinbase needs some in their wallet user

The Bogs are saving REQ.

>req is so useless people are throwing it away
l
m
a
o

what if the supply is lower and demand also goes down?

Price doesn’t move

then the price stays the same

thanks, guys.
for not calling me a brainlet

Wow, that’s like what amazon does in microsecond. There’s no possible way this is an indicator of adoption... i-is there user?

4127 boys

Attached: EB22AC1A-9950-4866-BF5C-230C70139E52.gif (200x150, 1.21M)

>it's real
what the fuck is going on?

Amazon/Coinbase Partnership confirmed.

If that happened I think my dick would explode

You better wrap it up first then. Strap in!

Perhaps it is the Crowfunding app being tested by the NGO's or companies that Request mentioned in one of their recent updates.

Or
Maybe
COINBASE

guys something weird and creepy is happening

Everyone who bought in at the ico and passed KYC got replica Req token swag in the mail as a thank you/promotional thing. It turns out that these tokens were made out of compressed crystal meth. An user 'discovered' that there is a uniqe ethereum private key encapsulated in each meth Req swag token obviously, the easiest way to get to it is to burn and inhale the token, which leads you to,buy more req. However, when you finally get to the pkey and try to access it using Eth wallet software, it actually triggers an event in the req smart contract that sends all the user's req tokens to an unusable address, thereby "burning" the tokens and lowering the total supply of req so that price can increase. We all thought usage and adoption would make this happen, but it turns out that request network is doing this on the backs of their trusted investors.

AHAHAHAH you brainlets think just because there are less coins that demand will increase. The price will rise because of the smaller supply but there is no reason to believe that there will be any more demand just because there are fewer coins. Enjoy your 5% pump while you can I'll be laughing when the price still goes nowhere because nobody wants this shitcoin.

Attached: 8adabe5f9673d16a6c4f3.jpg (728x640, 500K)

Keep the fucking price as low as it can stay. We burn more the lower the price is.

Here’s the REQ burner contract

etherscan.io/address/0xfcb4393e7faef06fab01c00d67c1895545aff3b8

You can see the address there is the same address sending the tokens to the 0x0000000 wallet which is the “burned” token address where REQ is permanently taken out of circulation by using Etherscan

etherscan.io/token/Request

What’s going on here bros?

If demand remains the same and supply shrinks, what happens then faggot? Please, I want you to tell me. It’s like you aren’t even trying.

Attached: 27A3AA67-47F0-4522-A0B7-2479705B42B4.jpg (474x400, 50K)

What did they mean by that?

Is the update this Friday? Looks like a good entry point right now anyway

Attached: 1455831202629.png (936x724, 18K)

source ?

Feeling pretty good about my 26575 entry a few min ago.

Might wait to see if there is more burn and more volume before I fomo in.

Its not real
cause ITS EVEN HIGHER NOW

Staking is coming this Friday. Screencap this.

Could we have staking and burning or is that an impossibility?

real question - is the growth linear or exponential? They look the same for the first few months.

Why couldnt we?

you do know there are million of req fund tokens to still be added to the circulating supply right?

I think they’ve said before it’s theoretically possible to have both but not something they’re thinking too deeply about right now.

logarithmic.

As more money is transferred, there will be a point that token burn converges to so we'll never run out of Req to burn. Highest amount of burns will happen at the beginning.

One thing we know for absolute certainty.... the price is not going up because black people are buying because black people have no money

So wtf does this mean? 100 EOY but 102 end of 2019v

I mean, I dont think that much because adoption is also increasing.

What?

Fuck do I sell my ZIL for this req coin.

Be real biz

I put in 200k in this market at the start of 2017 and my port stands at around $5.3mill.

I dumped LINK, SALT, TRX, and a bunch of other coins I bought from ICO. I didn't dump REQ because its one of those projects that could hit $1bill or more.

Cool I didn't know that. User growth is what I meant, was unclear.

Nobody knows if it's real or not yet.

Do you want to stay poor?

Req $55 eoy

13k Link 2k RLC 25k ZIL.

What do I do?

Can you fucking read I explicitly answered your question already in my last post.
>The price will rise because of the smaller supply
I actually don't even feel bad for REQ holders if an illiterate monkey like you can represent them.

All in req until Friday then diversify back to your positions.

req $50 eoy

Okay, i sold few linkies and now my folio looks like this. I’m going to make it r-right?

11k REQ
12.5k LINK

Attached: F3DAB11B-C64A-4D44-9B94-99EA1CBAFFE3.jpg (225x225, 23K)

Fuck... your lying to me. ZIL has announcements in 2 days. RLC has some too.

Too many 50$ EOY posts. We are being fucked with

REQ $51 EOY

It’s not my fault you write poorly and are a faggot.

HOLY SHIT NNNOOOOOOOOOOOO MY REQ

Attached: 2018-05-22-072323_825x298_scrot.png (825x298, 30K)

You’re.

And no, I’m not. Don’t be a pussy.

Fuck off. Don't be a lying jew.

Or maybe this newsletter coming up will announce it!!???

>Enjoy your 5% pump while you can I'll be laughing when the price still goes nowhere because nobody wants this shitcoin.

They said that about ETH at $40

penile insertions.

No...we’ll never live this one down, somebody threw away hundreds of dollars for nothing...we’ll be mocked until the end of time...

Attached: 19CF2B88-3A9D-4C04-A544-3FE353F54023.jpg (591x769, 304K)

>tfw reqt
Back to 5 cents eoy nothing to see here

Attached: 974073C1-D5D9-4CFD-A2AC-D9CC190BF54A.png (371x362, 190K)

Which one of you posted this kek

Attached: IMG_1965.png (750x1334, 130K)

Fug !
Hold me bros !

Attached: 1522526344059.png (965x692, 28K)

this is the rapture that the bible foretells

If you go on etherscan you can see the burnt req came from 3 different wallets that are all more or less empty now. Someone did this on purpose

So it's not from fees but from someone deliberately burning them? Or I guess either one person with three wallets or three dapp tests maybe.

Correct. Someone sent req directly to the burn address from wallets that are nearly empty.

If it was due to a large transaction you would reasonably expect the wallet it was sent from to have a recent large transaction logged from which the burn would have originated but that's not the case. Someone deliberately burnt their own req on the two month anniversary of the token burn system

Interesting. Can we trace the wallets to a main wallet with his larger holdings?