Reasonable Chainlink FUD thread

You posted the exact same thing in the other thread.
This is just nonsense. What i think is happening is your inner monoloug is a weak crybaby. So when reading it thats how you hear it in your head.

you bowling pin looking faggot.

Depends what Thomas meant. I would assume that the scope of Chainlink nodes are their independent functions and not the systems that exist outside of the nodes themselves, and the reputation and consensus mechanisms appear to be just that.

Node responses are aggregated via a consensus mechanism and a global response is returned and the reputation system allows users to evaluate oracle performance holistically.

From the whitepaper:

>Off-chain, ChainLink initially consists of a network of oracle nodes connected to the
Ethereum network, and we intend for it to support all leading smart contract networks.
These nodes independently harvest responses to off-chain requests. As we explain below, their individual responses are aggregated via one of several possible consensus mechanisms into a global response that is returned to a requesting contract USER-SC.

>The Reputation System proposed for ChainLink would record and publish user ratings of oracle providers and nodes, offering a means for users to evaluate oracle performance holistically.

Reasonable Chainlink fud is oxymoronic at this point.

So? Not everyone reads every single thread. Or do you not realise that? Gotta get the message out bro.

^ i can't read this post

FAT
A
T

So IOTA > Link or what?

His comment literally said they're not developing the contracts privately.

Average age of a male x 365 x price of a big mac

That oughta clear some things up for you

You’re doing the lords work. God I hope you’re right