Mfw a newworlder tries to educate me about what "real" communism/socialism is

>mfw a newworlder tries to educate me about what "real" communism/socialism is

Attached: karel-roden-1331.jpg (400x300, 67K)

Obsessed.

agreed though, boomer filth, bible thumpers and gays ought to be eradicated

Attached: e2.jpg (552x530, 20K)

>ussr saved eastern europe from immigrants and transagenda
>hurr durr the ussr was bad!!!1

not him, but it's not an obsession, the retarded tankies are almost always burgers

>mfw an Eastern Euro whose country’s economy has yet to be destroyed by neolib economic policies tries to talk to me about the free market

Attached: A3322FB1-4B29-49E1-BCEE-BF92092311B9.jpg (250x250, 17K)

Don't believe we are on the same page here

>said Mr. Denmark
Actually, imho, the real socialism is close to what you can see in modern day northern european countries. If these are not more or less socialistic societies, than I don't know what is. Take Norway, for example, at first they were all poor, and then - puff, oil and gas - and they are all suddenly richer. As I see it, there was no striking difference between rich and poor as in US (slaves-masters) or Russia/USSR (yeah, pretty much the same slaves-masters relationships as in US except the niggers are white here).

This

You may have been poor but you weren't replaced and pozzed

Czechia never had real communism tho

USSR never had real communism as well. As it was pointed out by Trotsky, the dictatorship of politburo has nothing to do with the communism/socialism.

>real communism
Here we go.

>replaced and pozzed
Ask Balts, Ukies or Crimean Tatars about that

>You may have been poor but you weren't replaced and pozzed
Luckily Estonia gets to be all three.

>Ukies

Attached: Population_of_Ukraine.png (887x548, 23K)

If you don't think Stalin is the greatest man on earth you're deluded

depends on the definition of "greatness"

>at first they were all poor, and then - puff, oil and gas
wrong

Attached: norway before oil.png (565x405, 38K)

I really wish your country would get overtaken by Russkies so you have a first hand experience

I meant that they were not at all that rich way back, some time before 20th century, e.g. when they were basically occupied by Swedes. It's the long-term history that determines the consciousness of a nation, which, in turn, determines how the subjects of the said nation view each other. Imho some innate 'egalitarity' is a necessary prerequisite to the socialism (as in 'society-oriented state').

The only good thing to compe up from yer cunt is Czech Casting. Grade A women fellows, you better believe it.

USSR was real communism. And it was beautiful

I thought it was really impressive how the people of your country killed hundreds of soviet MBT's all by themselves with barely any weapons

How old are you? Just asking. If you're younger than 50 then you're fake news, for you couldn't have seen all the alleged beauty of so-called soviet communism.

Eastern Europe, Germany and Russia under Socialism rule:
>Scientific breakthroughs
>Population growth due to natives having kids and not because of migration
>Strong feeling of unity
>Powerful armies
>Optimism in every person's hearts and the desire to make the future better than the present
>Traditional values and morals

Same regions today:
>The few people who do come up with new ideas either flee to the west or abandon their research
>Population growth below replacement rates
>Societies fractured into multiple different groups
>Laughable militaries
>No hope for the future, in some cases to such an extent that a quarter of a country's population moves away in just 25 years
>Consumerism runs rampant, family values have long since been abandoned

But go ahead, listen to the capitalists and their puppet "journalists" slander the Eastern Bloc.

Attached: 107213.jpg (355x499, 119K)

no such thing
'cause they're either broad (many definitions and applications throughout history) or largely undefined (communism).

don't pretend you know what you're on about if you're never read a book, subhuman.

>Scientific breakthroughs
In military applications
>Population growth due to natives having kids and not because of migration
Population growth because there was fuck all to do and contraception wasn't much available either
>Strong feeling of unity
Yes, against communism
>Optimism in every person's hearts and the desire to make the future better than the present
The optimists were those who still hoped commies will one day fuck off due to how shitty that system was
>Traditional values and morals
Corruption and ass-kissing. Yeah, I know those are traditional Russian values but they weren't everywhere else.

true

>Here we go.
It's true. You never had communism at all. Communism was the goal, sure but you just had socialism

Real communism doesn't exist.

>implying there is a difference
All the attempts at socialism always end the same so making the distinction is pointless

ah so not socialism at all then

>All the attempts at socialism always end the same
explain Nordic cunts then

>mfw a millennial pretends he knows what communism was like because he doesn't enjoy commieblocks.

Simple. You start with capitalism. You let the companies develop then you start taxing the workers but leave the companies making money. Even nords might one day collapse due to that famed cohesion of theirs collapsing due to migration.

>western euros trying to debate communism

-100 Social Credit Score.

because it isnt socialism you fucking idiot
read a fucking book
socialism is a planned economy where a central group or multiple groups of planners distribute resources based on some arbitrary criteria whereby people only get what they “need” and basically all industry is nationalised

>underage trying to debate

>implying anyone but underage shits tries to defend communism