Ch*ld p0rn0

Are you libertarian?

Smashing pedo teeth in should be a national sport

t. Pizzagate neckbeard QAnon deep state Jow Forumstard

>Paedophiles and other sickly degenerates should be forced to fight wolves in an arena for our entertainment

Attached: 1535058003339.png (757x1150, 1.18M)

The police are looking for your ip m8

>nobody should be punished over thought crimes
>btw let's torture and murder every pedo regardless of they've ever done anything
Exceptions are fun when they're convienent to my position

Fuck off you sick piece of shit

It would be nice if people could tell the difference between child porn and hebe teens.

Ephebophilia is for patrician unlike p*dos, who should be buried under the prison

You would not survive very long in the arena

t.libertarian

Attached: 1537526957351.png (330x384, 29K)

>t.

Attached: 21819760_1730149097058842_8433446311813971968_n.jpg (630x640, 71K)

Fugg

I hate it. it makes my wife cry

Attached: 1530438074137.jpg (433x552, 13K)

This

Attached: FAMA MUNDIAL.jpg (223x226, 6K)

She is like 30 you faggot mate.

>Not wanting sickos to fuck your kids makes you a soyboy
Fuck off and die you freak

The whole cached image thing is super problematic, but the thing is if they're hunting you down then they're likely got reasonable cause. There's not enough resources to just hunt everyone on the planet.

>govt agent emails you/somebody inconvenient a picture
>do what they say or go to prison
Hmm yes quite a reasonable state of affairs

>Jow Forums
why tho

there isn't a single government on Earth that allows it AFAIK
everything is underground

>Simple possession should be allowed
only if they can prove the porn isn't done anymore, like the image is from last century or something
if the porn is new it means someone is committing a crime and the one possessing videos/images is being accomplice

I’ve literally heard a group of women call a 45 year old man a pedophile because he was lightly flirting with a 19 year old woman.

>if they're hunting you down then they're likely got reasonable cause

Attached: 1538444746326.png (230x219, 7K)

what a monster

Boomers have no place hitting on women.

The scary thing is, if that rumor sticks to him it could cause him all sorts of serious problems.

t. p*do

I honestly don’t even think he was hitting on her in the sense that he was trying to get in her pants.

Jow Forumstards are p*dos

lol either "hitting on a woman" is a boomer term (because i got it) or you don't know english

oh
but are they white????

user claimed this threads was a joke

What about all those innocent people they put in death row. ''''reasonable suspicion'' is a meme word.

user is being v& right now for "reasonable suspicion"
anyways this thread is going to get deleted soon, which is a pity because we're having a civil discussion so far

I originally said he was mildly flirting, which isn’t the same thing as hitting on someone, desu.

You think that's bad. The 40 year old daughter of a family friend had a secret online relationship with a 20 year old Australian guy whom she invited to stay in the house where she, her husband, and their two children live. After the divorce, the wife and the daughter moved to Australia presumably to stay until he gets what he needs then sends her ass packing. I don't know how the husband didn't murder them both because that would have been the first thing that I did. I'm also not sure how she was able to take any children with her. That was her third husband too.

Why is this thread still up?

>are they white
No. Have you not seen the meetup photos?

can the mods delete this thread please?

Paedophilia is just another fetish, just like gays fetishes to same sex. So, if gays porn media are allowed to become mainstream and propagated, so is paedophile porns.

Pathetic attempt to deface the LGBT community.
Incest and bestiality was legal long before gay marriage in certain states.

It should be illegal to photograph or video debauched, illegal things upon minors. Possession shouldn't be illegal, and producing something in the making of which no child was harmed or no laws were broken shouldn't be illegal.

I'm not a """libertarian""" but I think that punishing people for thoughts is ridiculous, even if said thoughts are repulsive.

the term is overused

Can someone tell me what the first rule of fight club is?

aaah my bad

remember to report it as "off topic"
there's nothing illegal posted here

it's more of a slippery slope fallacy 2bh

>in the making of which no child was harmed
children WERE harmed during production of porn
unless you're talking of 2D/3DCG that, in no one's sane mind, could be included because those are virtual kids not real

>children WERE harmed during production of porn
The legal definition can and has been used to include things like self-photos taken by horny teenagers, or non-sexual nude photographs.

btw anyone noticed how many unitedstatian flags are posting in this thread?
i'm pretty sure OP asked about other countries

>self-photos
why would they distribute them to the public?

Often they send them to their girlfriend/boyfriend but it makes its way to other people eventually. Then the kid in question has to deal with not only the embarrassment of the photo spreading but with legal problems.
Other times a stupid kid just posts a photo of their own tits/butt/crotch online.

>why would they distribute them to the public?
Stupid question.

Penalty for pedos should be the firing squad

>with legal problems
holy crackers, that's retarded
and they get Miranda'd and everything?

btw there's something interesting that OP didn't worded but could have been discussed
it's almost universal that anything below adolescence is bad sexing, but where does adolescence and adulthood start, that's what differs among people
here a teen (14 and above) can date an adult with parental consent... or could in the past, now it's illegal. thanks a lot Obama

This

It is retarded.
theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/20/teen-prosecuted-naked-images-himself-phone-selfies
nbcnews.com/think/opinion/teen-sexting-case-revealed-how-judges-let-police-invade-children-ncna830306

t.libertarian

Attached: you cant fool me.png (335x377, 79K)

bump

In America 21yo girl with a 35yo guys is pedo.

In romania a relationship between a 11yo with 80yo old man is consensual

>a complete folder of my high school and other ones' thots that I haven't deleted yet eventhough I'm already 21 and could get in trouble
I don't know what to do :(

Canada, and many European countries have their laws codified and as it stands in Canada, A LOT of high school students would have committed the crime of possession of child pornography and/or distribution of child pornography. There was a case in Nova Scotia I believe which resulted in an 18 year old being labeled as a sex offender as a result of these laws. In Canada, there isn't much of a discussion on these subjects but I think a lot of people do believe that it is not right that teenagers are being prosecuted with possession/distribution of child pornography when sharing intimate images with their romantic partners.

Also, there seems to be a logical disconnect when the legal age to have sex is 16 but it's illegal to send sexual content to a romantic partner until you are 18 in Canada.

Although prosecution is rare, the law still stands and many schools have sessions where police come in and tell them that sending nudes is criminal and could land them in jail.

I think the child pornography statue in Canada should stand as it is for the majority of people but there should be some defences provided for romantic partners (above 16) and below 21(??) as long as the pictures are kept between the couple and the pictures are not distributed online or to others.

In this day and age, it's unreasonable to expect that romantic partners in high school wouldn't share nudes with each other.

>Unironically using the term ""LGBT community"" to refer to your degenerate club of sodomites

Back to leftypol

I've been called a pedo bc I fucked a 16 yr when I was 20

Put it on a flash drive

Because teenagers are stupid and do dumb shit for attention