>*Record scratch*
>*Freeze frame*
>"Yup , that's me . You're probably wondering how I ended up in this situation ..."
*Record scratch*
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
I am pretty sure you are a proxy.
Based NATO putting down the Serbian tantrum throwers.
>innocent serbs
YEAH KILL EM
>innocent russian vdv arrives
>NATO general: YEAH GO KILL EM
>brits: i-i d-don't really want to start WW3 guys...
>>innocent serbs
No such thing
>then this plays
Yknow America just does NATO involvement stuff to make it look like it's not just a superpower misinterpreting the meaning of gunboat diplomacy and bombing the fuck out of a long series of countries.
fuck serbia and fuck nato
>innocent russian vdv arrives
>innocent russian
>
Having a real hard time trying to figure out what these words mean
They doen't seem to make any sense at all if you put them together
>D'Alema is the one who bombed Serbia
>2 years later
NATO should be bomb'd тбх
That's literally a fart compared to the damage suffered by serbia
The fart killed more people than the bombing. It also marks the start of a chain of future islamic terrorist attacks in the west...
>Casualties and losses
>None
>Innocent serbs
imagine if we didn't keep Serbian aggression at bay when it surfaces
>sharing the only time Russia had any involvement in the Yugoslavia war
Lmao in reality Russia stood by with their dicks in their hands while the USA and NATO bombed the shit out of brother nation Serbia lmao
All you could come up with was attack Georgia and pretend the west gave a fuck about what most people think is a US state
Arkan was aesthetic
youtu.be
An humanitarian action killing 1500 military and doing almost 100$ billion on economic damage seems lot more significant than a suicide attack killing only civilians with 50$ billions in damage
>It also marks the start of a chain of future islamic terrorist attacks in the west..
I can only think of the madrid and london bombings in the 2000s, but terrorism in the western world didn't get actually significant till the refugee crisis and the Paris attacks in 2015
Here's the superior one
Why is the piece of shit holding the tiger like that?
Terrorism in the western world honestly isn't significant. At least compared to places like Somalia or Iraq.
That being said 9/11 is still the worst by a fair margin
>innocent russian
>violates a UN safe zone
>wonders why they get fucked up
Nothing wrong with how he's holding it
No, civilian casualties is worse than military, and 911 does in fact mark the beggining of systematic islamic terrorism in the west, and it's still not over so I don't see why you stop at the 2000s. The only point you are right on is the economic impact, but the Yugo economy was fucked when the war started. Still it's all a big fat bitch karma for NATO.
That'd be the garage bombing of the world trade center in 91