HAHAHAHAH I WAS RIGHT REQTARDS ILL KEEP POSTING IT UNTIL YOU ALL INDIVIDUALLY APOLOGIZE TO ME AND SUCK ME OFF YOU PIECES OF SHIT
APOLOGIZE
REQ $1k eoy sir
based
>REQ will never, ever get 1% of Paypal's daily transaction volume
oh, good point. well argued. great foundation for the rest of your thoughts!
REQ can't even compete with Bitpay little dummy, what makes you think it can compete with paypal
buy signal
Apparently I can use it to send $10K for $1.50 -- according to your own FUD.
Perhaps 1% of Paypal's customers would be interested in that.
270 tokens in six weeks. That's less than .0001% of Paypal's daily volume. Nobody uses cryptocurrency to buy things, end of motherfucking story you dumb motherfucker. They use it to get rich, it's that motherfucking simple. And you won't accept the facts until it's too late.
The REQ dev team is incompetent Frenchmen, nobody wants to buy things with Kyber Tokens, do you realize how ridiculous it is that they implemented Kyber Tokens instead of Bitcoin Cash or Litecoin or Monero or Dash?
yeah i'd need to use Crypto for that, don't forget trying to cash that out with fees.
also I don't NEED REQ to send money if I can just use myetherwallet in the first place brainlet
REQ has been on mainnet for under two months, with a very limited amount of crypto-crypto support while the entire space has been in a bear market -- Paypal has been around for 20+ years.
REQ uses Kyber as an API to exchange tokens / coins/fiat -- BTC or LTC or DASH are fundamentally not suitable for that at all. You don't develop on the blockchain at all, clearly.
Wrong. Those coins can easily be implemented, BTC was implemented easily, why not LTC? Because the devs are lazy and incompetent. I've got some college coding buddies who could recreate this piece of shit network in an afternoon.
Use myetherwallet to send a payment request to me and I'll give you one ETH, right now. If you can use myetherwallet to send me a recurring payment request, I'll up it to one ETH every week for a year.
That's a lie. Kyber is a decentralized exchange. Bitcoin is not, neither is LTC, nor DASH.
This is backfiring on you because you're too dumb, m8
Wrong again Bozo, Bitcoin is currently available for payment requests on the request network. They didn't need to use Kyber to do that. So why couldn't Litecoin be implemented?
I can do it on Bitcoin easily, I guess that's REQ's killer feature then.
a 100 million for a request button on the ETH network. Wow must buy.
> I've got some college coding buddies who could recreate this piece of shit network in an afternoon.
That is the most boomer thing I've read all week. You clearly have 0 programming experience.
You can use REQ to pay in any currency, eventually. Right now Bitcoin is supported, but Litecoin isn't.
On the backend, REQ uses Kyber as the autonomous exchange to make this happen.
An exchange is a place where things like Bitcoin are bought and sold, champ. And autonomous means it drives itself.
>some college coding buddies who could recreate this piece of shit network in an afternoon.
>That is the most boomer thing I've read all week. You clearly have 0 programming
I'm not a boomer, I'm a 22 year old multi millionaire.
cool but you're still retarded
Correct, they're currently using Kyber for ERC20 tokens but not Bitcoin, so one has to wonder why they chose the particular (useless) tokens they chose and why not more useful ones like LTC and Monero. Or at the very least, why not just integrate the dozens of ERC20 tokens found on Kyber?
I highly doubt a millionaire would be dumb enough to put money into REQ, i guess you're bound to lose that millionaire status soon..
I bought at ICO and sold for one dollar and fifteen cents. I planned to get back in but my independent research made me realize this was a poor investment. See the results of my research in the spreadsheet I provided in the OP.
my bad I thought you were the REQtard claiming to be a millionaire, i found that hard to believe
It's alright bro. Notice nobody can challenge us.
Where does the PwC partnership figure in this?