Do India or the booming African nations need a one child policy?

Do India or the booming African nations need a one child policy?

It clearly worked great for China despite what the haters (jealous westies) say.

Attached: 1523282502645.png (700x641, 431K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.timesofindia.com/South-Indian-population-to-decline-Experts/articleshow/18095493.cms
m.youtube.com/watch?v=VV4jPPEUcMo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

India doesn’t, the fertility rate is already below 2 in most states.

Attached: 414145A0-CC01-4DFD-AFEF-802CE75A3E17.jpg (2150x1535, 307K)

hindi niggers need zero child policy. Rest of the states are fine

t. Venkata Balasubramaniam from Tamil Nadu

India and Bangladesh have pretty stable birthrates now. They're both between 2-2.5 The real damage was done in the few decades after independence.

t. Pajeet Singh from Haryana

seriously tho, read up, South Indian population is going to DECLINE after 2030-40, Jesus fucking Christ hindi niggers have to be stopped otherwise Amiths and Pajeets will begin street shitting even here. We don’t shit and bath in the Kaveri like hindi niggers do in ganga

m.timesofindia.com/South-Indian-population-to-decline-Experts/articleshow/18095493.cms

>It clearly worked great for China despite what the haters (jealous westies) say.
>The recommended fertility rate to sustain healthy population numbers are at least 2.1 or slightly more
>One child policy
>Worked

I give it maybe thirty more years before China becomes a nation of pensioners

Hahahaha they can't be on a pension when Supreme Chancellor Xi changes the retirement age to 150 about a decade from now.

this these subhumans are responsible for every negative stereotype about india and only drag the country down, im fine with a genocide

>Hahahaha they can't be on a pension when Supreme Chancellor Xi changes the retirement age to 150 about a decade from now.
I dont know who will win world hegemony. The US fatties in their mobility scooters or the 110 year old Chinks in their mobility scooters. Surely a battle to last the ages.

Should I buy shares of Indian economy?

whiter than you Linkesh

It didn't work out for China. They recently abolished the policy because there weren't enough children being born to care for their quickly aging workforce. The world can easily support 10 billion people and Malthusian attempts to limit population growth are morally repugnant . All developed nations once had a high birth rate that was significantly decreased as living standards increased and the same will happen to sub-Saharan Africa.

>we wuz aryanz
whatever you say to make yourself feel good you bobs and vegana sender

kys Dravidian scum

>The world can easily support 10 billion people
With the same living standards as the first world?

It was always planned to be a temporary thing. Yes it would eventually have lowered naturally but forcing it to happen sooner helped them develop faster.

post ur hand northie street shitter

Attached: my hand.jpg (3264x2448, 2.59M)

>but forcing it to happen sooner helped them develop faster.
Yeah I honestly want to live in a urban city in china it looks comfy af

Attached: Baishizhou-alleys.jpg (640x640, 205K)

Yeah except even after they abolished it, the standard was engrained in people's minds and they were still only having one kid.

Nuke Bihar, Haryana and UP and India would become a second-world country overnight. Probably Argentina-tier. I'm not even memeing.

It's so diverse that you can cherrypick any image you want to paint the desired narrative but you can't deny China's development has been extremely rapid

Attached: shanghai.jpg (854x480, 150K)

I'm talking about the mainly second to first world cities:
>youtube.com/watch?v=VV4jPPEUcMo

Wrong link.
>m.youtube.com/watch?v=VV4jPPEUcMo

>shanghai
even though shanghai's the most developed part of china. average income in shanghai is less than half of south korea's average income.

I don't think so. Population will decrease naturally once they become developed enough. For now Africans need more kids to do farmwork (most of Africa still has rural populations) and India is developing very quickly. India has potential to become next superpower.

>India has potential to become next superpower.
Stop reading Indian propaganda.

What did Haryana do? They have a a declining birth rate and have a pretty good GDP per capita (ppp) compared to the other states mentioned.

Attached: 306FE77D-1CBF-4385-AD62-B3A0DBEEFB61.png (1200x1446, 314K)

Except for the shithole states with far too many people already

Yes for Africa and Bihar/Pakistan.

China only went below replacement in 1995 and has been 1.6 or so since then.
Their demographic issues are heavily exaggerated when successful, and far older, South Korea/Taiwan/Japan are right next to them.

That’s to be determined

2018 is only the second year where the one child policy did not apply.

Source?

$20,000 per capita in 2017.
South Korea is $31,000 in 2017.

Or the next Argentina

Attached: 106046B5-F511-432A-85FD-132B04E06883.png (1334x750, 257K)

Ya the south needs more kidsm india aint overpopulated its overcrowed in cities an the infrastructure sux...tokyo is the biggest city in the world n india needs better infrastructure and population growth.
Overpopulation is a meme for whites

Sad cuz south indians are the original indians

The most populous states there have the lowest birth rates

>China only went below replacement in 1995 and has been 1.6 or so since then.

Are you seriously implying that nearly 25 years of subpar fertility rates has no detrimental effect to a population? The Chinese retirement age is roughly 50-60 years old depending on industry of the person, you're losing out on an entire generation and half a working life, which, if left unchecked like its doing right now, will cause fucking massive problems.

>Their demographic issues are heavily exaggerated when successful, and far older, South Korea/Taiwan/Japan are right next to them.
>far older
Chinas median age is 3 years behind South Korea and Taiwan and only has a slightly higher fertility rate. Taiwan, South Korea and China are all comparable if anything. And we're not even getting on the topic of how birth rates in China will continue to drop as it modernizes and urbanizes its population, as opposed to South Korea and Taiwan who are already at 80% urbanization.

What you need to do is convince married men to wear a franger and the best way to do that would be to change inheritance laws so all of a deceased father's estate went to the youngest child regardless of sex

Not really. UP is the most populous state with a TFR of 3.1 at 200 million people, Bihar has population of 100 million with a TFR of 3.4. This is alarming and the states aren’t catching up at all, the people there are emigrating to other states.

The rest of the country has relatively low TFR. The other Hindi states are relatively high (2.5-2.7) but not that concerning since they have a smaller population. The ones in the North East are also sparsely populated so a TFR of 2.9 isn’t alarming. Meghalaya has about 2.6 million people.