why are people so opposed to the DPRK?
it is widely known that the South Korean government is the illegitimate successor to Korea. All of Asia was destined to be free from the hateful ideology of democracy and capitalism, but unluckily America was able to get a very tight grip on Asia. regardless, America couldn't stop the removal and cleansing of hate, as shown by the results of the Chinese civil war and Vietnam civil war. North Korea is the true government to the Korean peninsula, and people who support the South Koreans are traitors to the Korean people.
Why are people so opposed to the DPRK?
Jaxon Myers
Other urls found in this thread:
Matthew Campbell
Read this website
en.nknet.org
Carter Gray
honestly? i was taught that the dprk was illegitimate because they didnt accept southern elections.
Then i did basic research and learned that the south's "elections" were literally just village elders casting votes for their entire towns.
Nathaniel King
what is there to read?
it is South Korean propaganda.
Justin Miller
So basically the electoral college
Caleb Cruz
Because they're constantly threatening to nuke us.
There's also, of course, the constant attacks against S. Korea, which is a U.S. ally. Or the constant human rights abuses against their own citizens.
But I guess that means nothing to you.
Austin James
These motherfuckers can't stop talking about their three stooges. Kim this, Kim that, Kim Jong visited a spot and said that tree looked nice so we made a mural, Kim Song was birthed by tulips, now we Kim dance with 10,000 Kimmies, Kim Fatty clapped and we wept for hours, eternal president Kimmy captured a rundown US vassal Kim Kum Kim Kim Kim Farty Kim 2 Fatty Glorious Leader of Kimocratic Republic of North Kim & Sons & Don't Bring your Friends unless they're down 2 Kim
Levi Turner
Southern government refused to accept elections all the way until the 80's
they were a full fledged military dictatorship shithole
ever wonder why? maybe you should stop sanctioning and starving them and stop trying to make a hegemony over Asia.
Ayden Rivera
Range ban when?
Nathan Phillips
>DPRK
stopped reading
Colton Davis
Henry Torres
>communist country gets created
>us doesn't like this so they make half the peninsula start a war
>sanctions the north after reaching a stalemate
>hmmmm I wonder why they want to nuke us
Evan Phillips
Capitalism isn’t inherently wrong dipshit
It’s the Jews who turned it into a slave-system to siphon and embezzle funds to Israel
Adam Roberts
>British factory owners from the XIX century
>Jews
Oh yeah
Logan Cruz
it is inherently wrong ignoramus, because it is exactly what you describe; a slave-system to siphon and embezzle funds from the working class
Ryan Ortiz
both capitalism and communism are just systems designed to maximize production values from labor
Robert Morris
yes but in true communism everyone benefits from labour and takes only what is needed
in true capitalism the only person that benefits is mr shekelstein and his goon loonies
Oliver Ross
communism is inefficient. it might work for a little while but without the drive for competition it lacks stability
James Thomas
maybe, but in terms of best standards of living it is the ideal ideology
capitalism seeks infinite growth but the truth is that infinite growth is unsustainable, and sometime in the near future we are going to see the results of that
Asher Hill
do you honestly think any economy can thrive under communism
Ethan Phillips
yes
Cameron Jackson
The norks started the war you dipshit
Caleb Ramirez
it wouldn't. communism is really really inefficient.the larger the state gets, the more bureaucracy is needed and the more fragile and unstable the system gets. it could only work in places like dprk where the system is centralized and closed off. but it requires layers and layers of bureaucracy just to try and keep corruption at bay. and the larger the state actor gets, the more bureacracy becomes necessary. capitalism can also be a hotbed for corruption but if caught the people can take responsibility to hold demonstrations and protest. in communism the reliance on the state only allows the expansive bureaucratic system to deal with it
Easton Harris
>capitalism can also be a hotbed for corruption but if caught the people can take responsibility to hold demonstrations and protest
Capitalism doesn't need free speech to function. Don't confuse necessary and sufficient conditions.