/paki/ + /kashmiri/ + /afghan/ = /aryan/ general

dont seem like the same person

nose and mouth area are completely different

are you autistic? can you not tell the differences between faces?

She has several layers of makeup, probably took hours

make up or not, you can't turn an upturned danish pig nose (second picture) to a straight nose (first pic) unless she used photoshop

The noses are exactly the same, you are blinded and fooled by makeup

Reporting in.

What are your interactions with various South Asian diaspora like, how would you rate them: Gujaritis, Sikhs, Bengalis, Pashtuns, Mirpuris, Hindpoos, Punjabis

>Gujaritis
Most Gujaratis I've met are intelligent (usually top of their class academically) and somewhat wealthy (have nice houses)

>Sikhs
Played football with them in Southall when I was visiting cousins.

>Bengalis
My town had a lot of Bengalis in it so us and so they were in my circle of friends.

>Pashtuns
All Pashtuns I meet are physically fit and love sports, they're good fighters too.

>Mirpuris
Don't know how they ended up here to be honest. But they usually end up in the news, just not for the good reasons.

>Hindpoos
Don't know many Hindus. Most Indians here are Sikhs I think.

>Punjabis
I'm Punjabi and so are most of my close friends.

I see, thanks for sharing that. Are you the guy with the Pashtun mum?

No, I'm from Gujar Khan.

What are some prominent biradiris among the Punjabis other than the Jatts?

You mean castes? Pakistan doesn't really have a caste system anymore but there are Rajputs, Gujjars, Arians, but I'm not really familiar with these terms.

I do also hear of the terms like Shahs, Syeds, Rajas, Chaudrys, etc. but I think they are clan names.

Hmm, in India Muslims do have a region specific caste system. We have
>Syed - descendents of the prophet
>Beg - Mughal descendents
>Khan - Pashtuns (Pathans)
>Qurayshi - Butchers
>Ansari - weavers
>Sheikh - cleaners
>Mirza - high officials
>Jatt - Muslim Jatt
>Rajput

disingenuous low IQ subhuman

that's a fake chart, here's the real study

Here's the exact Yamnaya mixture for different NW Indian/Pakistani ethnic tribes-

Balochi - 32%
Bengali - 25%
Tiwari Brahmins - 45%
Brahui - 30%
Gujarati - 46%
Punjabi - 33%
Sindhi - 38%
Mala - 8% (low caste group from South India)

orxiv.org/content/biorxiv/suppl/2016/06/16/059311.DC1/059311-1.pdf

biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/suppl/2016/06/16/059311.DC1/059311-1.pdf *

Laziris et al (2016)

This just confirms what he said, none of these is above 50%

> implying Punjabi Hindus don't exist

ahahahah

Why Slavs are such pure Aryans? youtu.be/hVqrW-fPOQ0

Hindus mainly live in North London.

>implying panjabi Hindus are relevant

Hahahahahahaha

Attached: E03E6A78-4707-41E2-8A14-413AA48A4006.jpg (473x355, 185K)

o veerey, tussi dimaag na istimal na karte?

The Aryans also had significant Iranian Zagros farmer mixture which is completely absent from Europeans.

WE WUZ ARYANS N SHIEEEEET

Attached: ayo.png (1656x196, 103K)

>Iranian Zagros farmer mixture which is completely absent from Europeans.
How much do Punjabis have? And where are people finding these studies? I've always wanted to do one of those 23andme tests, but I've been worried about giving my DNA away

This is from a guy who browses Jow Forums.
Where did the Jewish come from?

Attached: 1051420710.jpg (239x328, 15K)

Punjabis on average have 30-40% Yamnaya DNA (depending on caste/tribe), 35-40% ish Iranian Zagros DNA and the rest is Dravidian/ASI

I also love genetics and major in Physio in college so I read almost every study that comes out on prehistorical populations. Go to any genetic journal and type in keywords you want.

The closest living thing to the aryans would be 2 finnish granparents one georgian and one pathan if i remenber well

Slavs are more Aryan than even Indian Brahmins

Attached: C5AAADF7-79BE-4C6F-97D2-BCC1AEB085CB.jpg (705x533, 74K)

You don't even know what Aryan means.

georgian, yes i agree

finn, no - you're forgetting Aryan is Yamnaya + Zagros. Georgians have substantial zagroid mixture

Finns would have more Yamnaya though. What's funny is there phenotype is the furthest thing possible from it too kek

Attached: Ancestral DNA Components in Modern Uralic Speaking Populations_Yamnaya_WHG_EHG_LBK_CWC_Siberia' (751x872, 88K)

> user here is saying a sl*v is more Aryan than me!

Attached: qWugztoF_NddtYF2Ms1fkn2woUMNJXp1BDkeaTp8ZfM.jpg (640x775, 127K)

Aryan have even less zagros admixture and more ehg if we are speaking of the eastern group at least

It means strong smart tall WHITE MAN with pointy straight nose not stinky nigger injun

Could you share genetic break up of North Indian castes? I think we can leave out Dravidians for having negligible Aryan DNA

I'm not talking about the first mix with the Zagroids my man. Very recent research has come out (like 2 months ago) that showed the Ancestral North Indian cline formed around 1700-1800 BCE.

This means the Yamnaya + Zagroid mix was responsible for creating the Vedic Civilization. This also makes perfect sense explaining the decline of IVC, rise of Vedic culture and the elite transfer of power in Harappa.

If the ANI cline formed 1700-1800 BCE, that is 400 years before the first advent of the 1st vedic age.

ethnic breakdown >> caste in North India

So a Punjabi Jatt will have far more Aryan mixture than a Bihari Brahmin.

I will try to find the exact breakdown and link it.

Is it true that Jatts are decedents of the Getae?

>Is it true that Jatts are decedents of the Getae?
No, it's just inferiority complex that makes Indian want to link themselves to Europeans.

The Jatts and Rajput came to India in around 3 or 4 AD and were basically Indo-Scythians invaders who settled around the Punjab region

A bunch of fucking mleccha cunts warping as Aryans lmao

>mfw r1a haplogroup but still B*ngali

why did my Aryan paternal ancestor have to procreate with dravidians??? why???

Attached: gedmatch MDLPworld.png (956x497, 26K)

>East Asian
The fuck?

>Khan-pashtun
pretty common name though?? not sure if elated to pashtuns for most people with that name

Refers to Southeast asian in my case : thai Cambodian etc... Unfortunately Bengalis have a lot of their admixture

No, Khan is the last name of Pashtuns in India. there are a whole lot of other Muslims who use it for no really reason

Guys, India is obviously a pretty popular travel destination but I'm very interested in visiting Pakistan too. Is it relatively safe for Westerners?

What are Zagroids??

do you mean Iranian neolithic farmers? in that case even dravidians are related to them

Yes if you stay in the cities.

Nice. I've been interested since I met my ex-gf, who was Sindhi. Where is best to visit?

Sikhs are based AF

Lahore, Islamabad.
What race are you btw?

You can also visit the northern areas like Gilgit.
Pic related connects Pakistan and China.

Attached: 1536209291670.webm (728x728, 2.26M)

I'm white British.

That's absolutely stunning. Are those areas safe?

WEBM*

>India is obviously a pretty popular travel destination
It's a shithole, don't bother. Try bhutan or nepal

They should be. Stay away from the Pakistan-Indian border in Kashmir because skirmishes happen there sometimes.

youtube.com/watch?v=BSJzvkciYkw

Stay out of the Tribal provinces and you'll be fine. Gilgit is safe and comfy.

>Pakistan-Indian border
No one even goes, there. Come on.

I've considered doing like a tour of the Indian subcontinent at some point in the future, especially the north, but I don't know where to start planning. I've always wanted to do Bhutan though.

It seems like it's pretty common sense stuff really, then.

>I've considered doing like a tour of the Indian subcontinent
>especially the north
Just how much of an idiot can someone be.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/agra/swiss-couple-attacked-in-fatehpur-sikri/articleshow/61228525.cms

>thinking all Yamnaya = Aryan

Aryan refers to a very specific branch of yamnaya descended people - specifically indo-Iranians. Between Sintasha and the Andronovo horizon there is several centuries of genetic alteration between the yamnaya and actual Aryans from recorded history

It depends on what he means.
If he means north-north, then that would be Kashmir, UP, Nepal, Bhutan, etc.

If referring to "Northern India", then that's like the top half of India and Pakistan.

Personally I wouldn't want to go in the overcrowded cities, but the capitals would be good. I would rather go sight seeing in Kashmir, Bhutan, etc.

India is shit for tourism. All of it.

HP* and Uttarakhand I mean.

Most third world countries are. If you're going to isolated mountainous areas, that's fine.

I don't really see why someone would want to go to some slum area to be honest.

I mean, they probably did something to instigate that.

I was more thinking the places that you listed there, so hopefully not anywhere too dangerous. I'd probably visit Delhi too. Can you fly from India to Pakistan, at all?

>Can you fly from India to Pakistan, at all?
I don't know, but you can cross the border at Wagah.

Just checked, you can fly but you need permission from both governments.

No, Nepal, Cambodia, Burma, thailand are all decent. But India and Bangladesh are fucking shitholes populated by assholes.

>I mean, they probably did something to instigate that
>telling a native what his country is about
Whatever, mate, go and get fucked in India if that's what you want

>India and Bangladesh are fucking shitholes
Depends on where you go. I wouldn't want to go to Mumbai but I would go to the northernmost areas.

Apparently you can get the bus across the border, which I might do.

Why the negativity about your own country? A literal subcontinent must have some good things about it. The article itself does say that they possibly did something to deserve it.

>Depends on where you go
No, it doesn't. I've been to 12 states out of 30 in India, all of them are shitholes and incredibly unsafe for foreign tourists.

>must have some good things about it
would you say the same thing for Somalia? India is decent enough to live in, but if you're non-Indian (white), Muslim or a woman it can get incredibly dangerous

youtube.com/watch?v=z-kYGagd2sw

bengalis are aryan + dravidian + east asian mutts

correct, yamnaya and zagros mix is aryan

by aryan I mean the creators of Vedic Civilization

Zagros farmers established the IVC. They then mix with the descendants of Yamna pastoralists to create the Vedic culture. Zagros farmers tend to cluster very closely with CHG populations. How are Caucasians so based?

>Iranians before the Aryan invasion

What did he mean by this?

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-09-04 at 9.18.15 AM.png (2346x186, 68K)

Why do you pajeets always try to associate yourselves with us online? We literally look down upon you as ugly subhumans

BIG AFGHAN COCK

Attached: af.png (580x387, 33K)

>tajik bro is back
Cool. did you pass your physics exam?

we do no associate ourselves with sneaky afghani subhumans, OP is just autistic

I'd rather associate with Afghans who we have a long history of warfare than other stinky pajeets

idc what sort of indian you are, you guys all more or less look (and smell) the same to me (and anybody else)

please stop with the cringe

speak for yourself ugly subhuman

im a 6'4 aryan mogging machine

It's, ok, mate. Deep down I know you love us.

I am honestly grossed out by indians. Kashmiri sikhs can be alright same with SOME punjabis but any other type of indian is just gross.

It's alright, I know you don't mean this. I'm Punjabi anyway.

punjabi sikhs and kashmiri sikhs are the only tolerable pajeets, the rest might as well be pakis

This is true actually

most punjabi sikhs are dalit converts tbqh

khatri punjabis and jatts are pretty chad though

hello ranjeet singh, stop larping as an afghan. it's obvious.

>khatri punjabis and jatts are pretty chad though
idk what those even are

I'm a tajik afghan from panjshir