Why didn't NATO nuke India after they attacked, invaded and annexed a part of Portugal?

He wasn't a communist, he was a socialist.

The problem with his economic model was that it wasn't applicable to India. Socialism is the exact opposite of what a country with low resources and high population needs.

>6 vampires
Now that's just cheating.

Article 5
>The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .

Right there in the first sentence.
>an armed attack in Europe or North America
India is in Asia, that's why NATO was not obliged to do anything.

In article 6
>For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France, on the territory of Turkey or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer

Goa lies south of the Tropic of Cancer

Because Americans are cuck traitors. They also let Macaco and Donkey Kong fell to the Chinese.

Portuguese are not powerful enough for us to unconditionally support them despite their stupidity.

Attached: original.jpg (1350x900, 1.09M)

Because America and USSR were pushing for decolonization in order to infiltrate governments and make puppets. They couldnt condemn Portugal in Africa and then help them in India.

Attached: Bombingnibbas.gif (444x250, 669K)

Portugal's dictatorship trigger both sides
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_Colonial_War

how is your pajeet Prime Minister
does he have public support
what sort of political issues do protuguese talk about
I mean you people are significantly darker than the rest of Europe so race issues might not be the top priority (I don’t mean this in an offensive way, tan skin looks good)

>Caring about politics in 2018 anno domini

Im not a boomer, they are all the same, right or left, doesnt matter, the system is badly setup anyways.
Your bait is not as subtle as you think it is.

Because we shouldn't foot the bill for Portuguese being unable to do shit.

Kek
Anti-colonialism is the only thing that the USA,Europe and Soviet Union agreed on

Because the NATO doesn't cover colonial possessions. I even says so in the treaty. That's why no one was required to help out during the Falklands war.

>does he have public support
He doesn't have the majority of the public support,he had to ask the communists and neo-socialists to help him form a government
>what sort of political issues do protuguese talk about
We only care about wage increase,anything else is irrelevant
>I mean you people are significantly darker than the rest of Europe so race issues might not be the top priority (I don’t mean this in an offensive way, tan skin looks good)
We're not the darkest in europe tho so your point makes no sense.In any case,we don't have immigration problems or terrorist attacks yet so our population doesn't give a fuck for now,but someday it will happen and people will make themselves heard

Because no one considered Portuguese colonies an integral part of Portugal except for Portugal

Why didn't Brits invoke NATO when Nasser stole their canal?

>our 100% portuguese, brahmin catholic prime minister
he does what he always have done; turning against his friends over short term gains. If things were like they used to, he'd be dead by now.

>does he have public support
not really, but party politics is a thing and even though his party is crashing, he should be fine. Trust is at an all time low (for all politicians) so he probably gets away with another term, it's not like he cares if shit hits the fan afterwards.

>what sort of political issues do protuguese talk about
same shit as always, taxes, gibsmedats, housing bubble, economic crisis, jobs, etc
Emigration and other imported issues (like the feminism trend) also get some space, but as most people get tired of "old news", they only last for a while before the next big thing comes in.

>race
not an issue. Xenophobia, maybe, but that kind of ivory tower isues are completely irrelevant and often are used as distraction by politicians, more so than anything else

Are the retardos completely integrated into mainstream Portuguese culture? Or do they forme their own community?

you mean retornados? the people that were persecuted from the colonies?

most of the original ones are either dead or not too far from that. Their families integrated easely since the majority only spent one generation in africa. Still, the bureaucratic barriers to their return were nasty and most simply gave up and went to brazil and the US.

if by retardo you mean portuguese-french descendants, euthanasia is the only solution, I'm afraid.

Can you understand this?

youtu.be/JmPYVbKWF70?t=1m43s

>Article 6
Whoa didn’t know that, does that mean that an armed attack on Guadeloupe, Martinique, French Guyana, Reunion and Mayotte wouldn’t be considered part of NATO even though they are a literal part of France since 1946? (Mayotte since 2011)

it sounds familiar, but it has several non-portuguese words, and intonation is probably borrowed from cantonese or something like that, since the tonic sylabes are all over the place.

I find it cute, nonetheless. It sounds a bit like when foreigners try to speak euro portuguese after being here for a while.

Yes. The same applied to the Falklands conflict.

>They couldnt condemn Portugal in Africa and then help them in India.
Eh, look more into history.
This kind of mental gymnastic is all over the place. Kosovo and other breakup states is the most prominent example.

I used to think canadians were nice people, Jow Forums changed my mind.

Because Britain could not afford to piss off that many people. Remember this is post WW2.

>Having banned interracial marriage under the apartheid system, South Africa's government opposed having an interracial couple ruling just across their northern border. As Bechuanaland was then a British protectorate (not a colony), the South African government immediately exerted pressure on the UK to have Khama removed from his chieftainship. The Attlee ministry, Britain’s Labour-led government, then heavily in debt from World War II, could not afford to lose cheap South African gold and uranium supplies. They also feared that South Africa might take more direct action against Bechuanaland, either economic sanctions or a military incursion

North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

>(((Organization)))

and??

Because these things only exist to protect the ZOG, petrodollar, and other things of kike interests.

Another example here, this is your cold war.

Attached: 1439074166068.png (455x2337, 328K)

see

Kennedy was way better than Johnson or even fucking Ford

Though all things considered, the world would have been a better place if Nixon had won in 1960. Nixon was too good for this world.

hmmmm?

Attached: india-kara-boga-kala-saand.png (996x960, 269K)

So desperate to retain your colonies.

Why would Christianity matter smooth brain?
What does worshioing a jewish rabi have to do with anyone.