Why Japan so terrible at fighting Korea?

>shimazu yoshihiro died at 1619
>tachibana muneshige died at 1643
>so yoshitoshi died at 1615

>Yi Sun-sin died at 1598
then at least Most of korean generals are died in the war according to wiki
OH NONONONO

Personally, I think it's because Koreans are more East Asian than Japanese. Koreans are 5% more East Asian, so they have smarter and more cohesive Soliders on the smallest level, and smarter and more conscientious military leaders on the highest.

Our admiral was too OP at the time.
On the land battles, however, we got raped.
Japan had just finished civil war and had many skilled veterans
Joseon had none
Plus Japan had muskets and Korea bows and arrows.

For the record, Chinese are only 81% EA, and they have had extreme casualties in every war they've ever had with the Japanese.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Japanese_War

They’ve fought like 3 wars

And a general trend is observable through each one.

The Chinese have more resources, but also more deaths. The same pattern crops-up when it's Japanese vs Korean. To run a war, it takes more than foot soldiers and generals.

It's pretty obvious it's mostly just race in the end.

genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations-next-gen/

Why Korea so backwards?

It's more that they were peaceful. Japan had been warring for decades before that invasion, they imported matchlocks from the portuguese and dutch and even started making their own improved versions.

but gookland has been a vassal state of china over 1000 years and a colony of japan

>muh benis

Attached: penis size.jpg (940x937, 235K)

Attached: 1539072869949.jpg (1041x1177, 739K)

We conquered most parts of Korea including Pyongyang but China disturbed it ;_;

Or that the wars (first and second sino japanese) were fought when Japan industrialized first and China was having significant internal problems.

You could argue that Japan industrialized first because of racial regions, but that doesn’t explain why Japanese domination didn’t start until 1860ish and not the thousands of years beforehand when China was ahead.

My cock is 5.9", 5.2" girth and I'm Korean, what the fuck.

that's just a meme gooks fall back on to cope. before the battle, gook navy had already been completely raped by japan in the battle of chilchongryang, and the 13 ships were the last ships left for them to begin with. and the casualty is only recorded on yi's diary. irl, after the battle yi's base and surrounding provinces were destroyed by japan.

japan was like a literal dragon in the imjin war. easily conquered the entire peninsula within a month and slaughtered a million of gooks.

>Given that the conflict was fought exclusively on Korean soil, Korea ultimately suffered the most damage of the three participants.[338] It lost a large portion of its military strength and civilian population, had numerous cultural heritage sites damaged or destroyed, and many of its technological advancements pillaged.[340] In many ways the invasions proved to be more devastating than any other event in the nation's history (even, arguably, more so than the Korean War).[339] The peninsula suffered a reduction of arable land to sixty-six percent of the prewar total,[341]
>The total military and civilian casualties, as estimated by the late 19th-century historian, Geo H. Jones, were one million,[347] and total combat casualties were estimated at between 250,000 and 300,000.[348] A total of over 185,000 Korean and over 29,000 Chinese troops were killed, and an estimated 50,000 to 60,000 captives were taken by the Japanese throughout the war.[349] Among those captured, a total of 7,500 were later returned to Korea through diplomatic means at the conclusion of the conflict.[350] A large portion of the remaining captives were sold to European traders – mainly Portuguese in Macau, who then resold them throughout Southeast Asia.[351][352]

Attached: imjin conquest.png (741x1013, 778K)

Not sure what your quote is supposed to indicate besides “dude people in a region die if a war is fought in that region.”
And it doesn’t matter how much of a dragon you are. The fact is that every Japanese attempt to expand militarily has been a failure.

China was having internal problems because of the Chinese people themselves. They will always have less stability than Japan on an equal playing field.

The Japanese as a people were also younger than Chinese.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Chinese_history

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/400_BC

>A Paleolithic culture around 30,000 BC constitutes the first known habitation of the Japanese archipelago. This was followed from around 14,000 BC (the start of the Jōmon period) by a Mesolithic to Neolithic semi-sedentary hunter-gatherer culture characterized by pit dwelling and rudimentary agriculture,[39] including by ancestors of contemporary Ainu people and Yamato people.[40][41] Decorated clay vessels from this period are some of the oldest surviving examples of pottery in the world. Around 300 BC, the Yayoi people began to enter the Japanese islands, intermingling with the Jōmon.[42] The Yayoi period, starting around 500 BC, saw the introduction of practices like wet-rice farming,[43] a new style of pottery[44] and metallurgy, introduced from China and Korea.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Chinese_history

>mocked by own girls
but your gook micropenis is well proven by korean girls

Attached: petit-zizi.jpg (700x520, 72K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yayoi_period

my quote indicates japan is a dragon that easily rapes korea and china under their home ground advantages. that's quite impressive actually. you see, a combined army of mongol, korea and china, using exactly the same route as pic reversely, couldn't even land on japan proper (inb4 storm meme, they fought for months before it). japan on the other hand singlehandedly devastated korea assisted by ming china reinforcement to such an extent modern gooks are still butthurt because they lost a good part of their ancient stuff to us.

Attached: 1484608792683.jpg (1024x1024, 115K)

But your quote doesn’t make mention of Japanese casualties so it’s difficult to assess,

Hahaha i like it

the total japanese casualty was somewhere between 20k and 50k, and a considerable part was from typhoid or malnutrition. KIA was pretty small.