Vikings

So England, Italy, Poland and Canada were more viking than Finland? Is that even posible?

Attached: Obszar_zajmowany_przez_Wikingów.png (800x310, 140K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runestone_U_582
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runestone_G_319
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_at_Herdaler
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agne
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Finland doesn't have anything to do with Scandinavia other than the flag and economic system that they copied from us

There were finnish raiders in the baltic sea for a while, but they were not vikings; that's a norse thing.

But finns rook the same as scandinavians, while the blonde/blue eyed people in south italy don't really rook nordic. I don't understand this

>implying vikings were just raiders

Attached: normanns.png (479x332, 262K)

they never really settled here, just a few overwinter camps

they went where there was wealth to pillage, finland was very poor back then

I never said that, really. "Vikings" is kind of a strange word though; it's become a catch-all term for any kind of seafaring scandinavian. The vikings were explorers, traders, colonists, conquerors, AND raiders.

Finns were living inland in the middle of an array of hill fortresses to ward off Vikings. When raiders were detected horns were blown from fortress to fortress and all the men of the land grouped and killed raiders.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runestone_U_582
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runestone_G_319
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_at_Herdaler

Yeah, swedish settlement of the finnish coast was more of a high medieval thing, afaik. 1000 - 1300s, rather than 700 - 900s.

Little known fact: Danes were actually the first to get the idea to colonize Finland and there was Danish presence there way before Swedes invaded.