Do you think the west/the US will ever turn on them? At least before oil runs out?

Do you think the west/the US will ever turn on them? At least before oil runs out?
It does seem like they receive more negative attention than before.

Attached: 2000px-Flag_of_Saudi_Arabia.svg[1].png (2000x1333, 48K)

If we actually manage to switch away oil to renewables I can't see the West having any more use for them.

No but I mean seeing how they most likely were behind 9/11 too and in general caused nothing but trouble don't you think a giant backstabbing is awaiting for them?

Don't know, but I hope so.

I'm surprised all the major powers didn't split the oil monarchies between them once oil became valuable during the oil crises.

no

This is exaclty what boggles me too. If oil is really the end to everything in the world why hasn't the west just teamed up on them? Or the US itself?

Aren't the globalist shits slowly turning away from Oil to renewables? Doesn't matter too much though, since then they will simply continue sucking the Saudi D for gas instead.

>At least before oil runs out
they'll run out of oil to ship before they run out of oil
they're one of the fastest growing consumers because over half the population is under 20
set to be an importer around 2030

Attached: saudi-arabia-oil-production-exports.png (765x460, 54K)

>for gas instead.
Does Saudi Arabia even have any gas?

they also have gas?

>Or the US itself?
Because the usa is an honourable country with strong morals and respect for national sovereignty

Qatar has shitloads of gas, I'm certain they do too.

>they were behind 9/11
Yeah, alright

Churchill who funded and armed the al-Saud family stated early on that he knew Wahhabism was “bloodthirsty” yet he was happy to keep the ruling families in power so long as they remained loyal to Britain. That sums up Britain’s relationship to this day with Saudi Arabia.

everyone has gas, especially countries with oil

Attached: Natural_Gas_Proven_Reserves.png (800x367, 129K)

15 of the 19 hijackers on 911 were Saudis, 0 Iraqis.

is gas not able to be replaced by renewables?

Already did.

Attached: image.jpg (677x948, 194K)

I never said that, but I think people simply meant that when we run out of oil we switch to LPG

Yeah, the US would NEVER invade, say, Iraq, under false pretenses to get its oil.
And even if they tried, the UK would expose their lies and shame them into reason.

Oh yes I forgot

...

Is this image real or fake

Attached: 7BB4C7FE-F921-4D0D-867F-53B7691931F0_cx0_cy3_cw0_w1023_r1_s[1].jpg (1023x575, 100K)

>15 of the 19 hijackers on 911 were Saudis, 0 Iraqis.

So 15 citizens define a whole country? There are probably way more than 15 Dutch citizens in ISIS and Al-Qaeda.

pls respond german user

shadows and lighting looks correct

When 15 out of 19(read it again) are of the same nationality and some of them met through a Saudi funded mosque in Hamburg you should really start to ask questions, yes.
Not to mention Osama Bin-Laden was a Saudi himself but was quickly turned into a scapegoat.

As far as I understand it, they want to use gas as a bridge for the time being, until they develop the renewables such as for electric or hybrid cars.
They might yes, but the technology is not developed enough, in comparison to oil which at least is under way.

is gas less polluting than oil?

Yes by far, it's seen as a much greener alternative. It's also right now much cheaper to run your car on than petrol and diesel I think.