Is STEM really a meme?

Had a class reunion recently.

At first, I was kinda anxious about it, because after graduating highschool, most of my classmates went studying math, engineering, physics, meterology, biology, chemistry and so on. Most of them were pushed on this by their parents, who were academics themselves.
I was a bit more free in what to chose, so I went with business administration and management accounting, because the university seemed appealing, I knew a couple of people there and wanted to move out of my hometown. Apart from me, just two or so went with history and something with social science. All the others: STEM.

This was roughly 9 years ago. But during the reunion, there was the general impression, that those outside of STEM were way more happy and successful than those, who went with STEM - both in financial as well as in personal terms. Even those who "succeeded" in their field were basically mental wrecks, who were quite open to talk about how horrible their time at the university was. And how they finally want to be financially independant from their parents, those phd with a phd.

Do some anons have a similar experience with this?

Attached: sophisticat.jpg (224x224, 12K)

Stem attracts liberals a lot. Finance degrees attracts more wealthy kids as they are more interested in investing. Marketing degrees liberals

Attached: tumblr_m2n2gpwn1O1rt6g0ro1_500.gif (500x281, 923K)

>Stem attracts liberals a lot. Finance degrees attracts more wealthy kids as they are more interested in investing. Marketing degrees liberals

I would not make this a libtard / cuckservative-debate, because I had the experience it being exactly the other way around. About 75% of my fellow students had to live on wellfare and jobs on the side, me not being an exception from this. And from the other 25%, none could be considered "wealthy".

Well, you generally have to work a lot harder for less in STEM. And your competition includes some of the brightest minds society has to offer, many of which genuinely love their fields (making them all the more effective).
Here's a lesson that's very much ignored these days: it's better to be a big fish in a small pond than a little fish in a big pond. You'll be happier being smartest guy in a room with average intelligence than the dumbest guy in a room full of geniuses. Pick something you can master relatively easily, not something that will take every bit of blood and sweat you can muster to be mediocre at.

post yfw you realize the >hodl meme is the equivalent to being a stemcuck who builds the infrastructure and keeps things stable enough to be speculated on by chad traders/non stem bois

Attached: 1502221565311.jpg (746x586, 126K)

So your take on this is, that there are too many people doing STEM?

people skills are always more important. poos and chinks have no choice, so they go stem. you are competing with literally billions of poos and chinks that are willing to work for nothing with a stem degree. Show me some well known business poos and chinks. Pro tip, you can't. So as long as you aren't a mildly autistic neet faggot, get a degree in business.

Nailed it. Hodl is a cuck meme.

Yes, I think that's a big part of it. STEM (and science in general) has a lot of cheerleaders, a lot of effort to get as many people as possible into it. This is good for the scientific output of societies, but bad for those that get directed into it without truly being cut out for it. It's also going to decrease wages and increase the difficulty involved in getting funding (something which I hear has become a huge pain in the ass) if there's a huge supply of scientists. And let's not even get into the whole student loans issue in the US.

Attached: science.png (720x585, 32K)

because their identities are way too tied up to their shit jobs and degrees. most happy people are those who don't associate themselves too much with their careers. yeah they can have nice jobs, but at the end it just a means to have more resources to spend with friends and family.

no lifers make too big of a deal with their careers

an actual brainlet

Do have anything of substance to say or are you just going to sit here and bore us with these transparent projections of your own inadequacy?

Oh and you also have to consider how long you're going to be a student if you want to go far in stem. A phd can easily cost you 8-10+ years.

The people I know who go into stem are either autists/Social retards or just very smart, rational people. The ones who are socially competent, chose the proper career paths, and don’t have their heads up their asses are happy with high paying, high status careers. The ones who were social retards continue to have mental health issues and are miserable, but they’d be miserable in any other career. STEM as a guaranteed path to success is a meme, but it’s a wise choice if you make good choices and have the aptitude and interest in it. I’ve known more people to go into law, medicine, or business and hate their lives than the STEM friends and aquaintences I’ve had.

>be autistic nerd
>go into STEM
>make money but still be an unhappy fuckup
I know, I am one

>And let's not even get into the whole student loans issue in the US.

Funny enough: it looks even worse, when you consider that 20% of having loans will be affected by the crypto-implosion... which worsens this mess even more.

>Show me some well known business poos and chinks. Pro tip, you can't.
Well... it is not like those with a degree in marketing have it easy finding well paid jobs, desu.

Well, at least the STEM graduates probably learned to write English correctly. You got to hand them that, OP!

This desu

I knew I was going to be miserable my whole life regardless of the type of wagecuck I am. I hate people, I can't deal with them, I can't deal with myself. But I got a 800 on math sats, 34 on math act, 36 on the science act. So I do programming, which is easy. I can do less work/overtime the more I bullshit/schmooze, but then I have to deal with people. I can do more work but then I'm braindead

I can at least pick my balance though

Talking to Jow Forums I'd say: the smaller the pond, the better!

Yes, STEM was sold to people who are not so inclined. STEM, before it was STEM, was pursued by kids who took apart their Christmas toys instead of playing with them. Many STEM graduates just go through the motions and are only qualified to manage the paperwork that the real engineers produce.

As long as no one complains aside from a random Jow Forums-user, I think my english is adequate for my daily job. But if you like to point to my mistakes, I would happily adapt and learn from them.