>Consensus seems to be that maximum human population planet earth can sustain in a healthy, environmentally conscious way is around 1.5 to 2 billion.
>Current population of the world is over 7 billion and growing every day.
What do you do about this?
I think we need to develop a genophage for all brown people.
The consensus is that the Earth can sustain 10-11 billion you fucking retard
>What do you do about this?
Only Muslims will be allowed to live, we will be back down to 1 billion.
Same if Chinese, Poos and whites decided the same thing
Would it hurt if I burnt the Koran?
hope it gets to 14 billion soon.
China is growing larger.
the less whites there are the faster humans breed, and its beautiful
Or we can just let women decide who they want to breed with, they'll naturally select for better genes
this is the "nothing is wrong, carry on as normal everyone!" study that is repeated because the truth is there is not an economic system on earth that is designed to withstand a stagnant or shrinking population. That goes for the entire spectrum left to right. It is completely uncharted territory.
overpopulation, which really began sometime in the 1960's, is the only issue globally that really matters. of all our problems overpopulation is at the core, but our world as we know it will crumble without continued population growth. its a knot.
there is no god/allah and if there was he hates mudslimes
glad at least Chinks classified pislam as a mental disorder
why r u worried about something you will never have influence over?
when human population tips the scale the ecosystem will crash hard, billions will starve and nature will start over again.
now go out and fuck a nigger/shitskinned beauty and dont loose sleep over overpopulation
>overpopulation, which really began sometime in the 1960's, is the only issue globally that really matters.
I would argue climate change is more important.
Colonization of space and if third worlders have more than 1 kid the whole family is only allowed to eat have their required calories for 5 years and the only food allowed is plain congi.
*congee
Chillin
I have a better idea. One BLACK BVLL for every ten wh*Te families, the wh*Te males will not be allowed to breed however.
Overpopulation is one of the cause of climate change.
>What do you do about this?
live in a country with less than 15 persons per square kilometer.
as everyone should do.
the cause
It doesn't matter, nature will find its way in case of being threatened
Cruel thing to say but it's mostly third worlders who will die off while we first worlders will remain relatively untouched.
and climate change will be the cure to overpopulation
>t. Grzegorz Chang
the globalized economy would crater
Start killing europeans, pajeets and chinks/japs/gooks. Their countries are crowded as fuck, just look at population density.
Anti-natalism works
China, South Asia and Africa should have no more than one billion combined. Even that is a little high, but it can probably be overcome with alternative energy.
I
Currentlymbined population is around five billion. It can't be withstood. North America and Europe are overpopulated too but not to the same ludicrous extent.
>first world white countries consume exponentially more resources and produce exponentially more waste than third world brown countries
>"dude we need to exterminate the shitskins lmao or else the planet will die lmao"
kys faggot
There are at least rules in the USA and Europe. China alone is destroying the planet.
Wipe out the chinks an pajeets. That would be a good start.
>kys faggot
Since you're the one saying the West should reduce its population how about you remove yourself first?
We'll see about that when Africa's population becomes higher than Asia in 60 years.
Invest in technology allowing for more efficient food production. Animal husbandry, for instance, is still near stone age technology and is in a league of its own when it comes to polluting and wasting absolutely enormous amounts of resources.
Simultaneously there should be some serious investment into colonizing space and other research allowing us to take a proactive stance vis-a-vis the long-term survival of our species.
>Consensus seems to be that maximum human population planet earth can sustain in a healthy, environmentally conscious way is around 1.5 to 2 billion.
[citation needed]
Or is this just the quote for the maximum human population if everyone lived like Americans?
There is no consensus. Worry about waste management is better than worrying about how many people there are
americans are so fucking stupid...
The problem could be solved if every American killed themselves right now. Despite being 5% of the population America accounts for 50% of the solid waste and 25% of fossil fuel usage.
Get rid of America and the remaing 6.7 billion people will be fine.
>>Consensus seems to be that maximum human population planet earth can sustain in a healthy, environmentally conscious way is around 1.5 to 2 billion.
19th century called, they want their nutjobs back
its pretty obvious that as technology changes the """""cap"""""" changes as well. Hypothetically you can have trillions of people doing less damage than the 7+ billion you have now, only the actual footprint matters. But Malthusian cretins keep barking their ancient propaganda like its scripture. Way to be ineffectual drama whores.
No, lets not shill for technologies that will lessen then burden on the environment. Instead lets virtue signal and pretend this will somehow stop Mbodobo and his wife from shitting out 9 kids.
>Current population of the world is over 7 billion and growing every day.
So what, retard? Did you even check the actual projections? Its never gonna reach 11 billions and then will start slowly deflating. Provide clean energy and half of the impact will cease immediately, the strain will be less than now. Go demand your representatives to push for more funding for ITER or something instead of boring us with your fake concern, narcissist fuck.
>waste management
and preservation of natural resources ghat we depend on, which are many and all over the place