Send an army to arrest one man

>Send an army to arrest one man
>Man approaches your army unarmed, alone
>Entire army defects to him
Is Napoleon the most charismatic man ever?

Attached: 1540130811130.png (318x463, 129K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=PrTzpjMqg1Q
youtu.be/Kiby2RBvFeE
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

That's not Mussolini

His dome is neat. :^)

Try not to feel
Try not to feel
Try not to feel
Try not to feel
..............
..............
..............! ;_;

Lenin did the same, revolutionary fevor is as close to divine will as reality gets to that concept.

I know right ;_; if only we succeeded, rest in peace my Emperor ;_;7

No, Hitler is.

He was doomed from the get go.

consistently cucked whenever he faced a competent leaders

Attached: SidneySmith.jpg (2400x3949, 1.26M)

Hahaha look at this Albion perfide

Attached: napoleon_smiling.png (641x641, 510K)

>he just gave up

what else would he do?
Keep going like Hitler and just have his men needlessly slaughtered?

not go in the first place because it was a terrible idea

well, that we can agree on, kek.

*dabs on the grande armee and the french empire*

Attached: toadab.png (1053x1080, 324K)

*escapes and becomes supreme ruler again*

nothing bersonell anglois

:^)

BASED

>Defeats your Emperor

Attached: tsar alexander I.jpg (503x600, 60K)

*sides with bongs and ottomans*
hehehe, what now?

*becomes your ally and fights alongside you in WW1*

It wasn't THEIR man, plain and simple. As much nationalistic lipservice the royals gave, at the end of the day their countries were deeply in debt to (((them))) and could easily be unmade.

They would much rather maintain control rather than give a shit about the soldier ant Jews on the field, if anything them getting shoa'd is better fuel for the fire.

That's Alexander the First

So now that the dust has settled, was he actually French or was he Italian?

...wow based

That's not Alexander the First*

I am going with Italian because there is no way a Frog could possibly be that based and masculine.

*exiles you again*

Hirohito, this isn't Jow Forums, we're a friendly and tolerant board

But then also he can't have been Italian because he wasn't pathetic at war.

Okay now this is getting personal

>hol up *buys baguette* Imma let you finish but *dodges truck of peace*

Yeah almost like Hitler was.

Was Napolean unironically right wing?

That's what masculinity looks like, Takeshi. Eat baguette and dodge trucks of peace.

That's what he gets for trying to mess with the ancien régime.

Attached: ancien regime.jpg (1280x720, 227K)

The hero Europe needed, but not the one it deserved.

>turned a republic into an empire
>hugely militaristic for the entire society, shit like levee un masse or whatever the retard french spelling is
probably. I dunno projecting right and left wing onto history is normally pretty meaningless

Monarchie and Empire are fine as long as we aren't a rep*blic founded on the """values""" of 1789

No you cuck he studied Voltaire

Based and Maurraspilled

>retarded
A little mean, please delet

Joking asides, the real mistake wasting resources on Portugal and then turning on one of your allies, facing a guerilla warfare in the entire peninsula as a result.

Maurras is Great. Nationalisme Intégral >>>>> Facism

i agree it is meaningless but kinda fun just to speculate about that

Superior Italian genes

He was the Stalin of the French Revolution. Much more conservative than the initial revolutionaries who ruled, and more pragmatic, but he never undid the foundations of the revolution, and the men of the old regimes never stopped viewing them as existential threats.

i hate voltaire ever since i learned he bullied euler. sure euler was a bit autistic and voltaire was a chad but that was just mean.

The island farthest from land that Britain owned, no less.

Voltaire was probably the biggest piece of shit of his time.

youtube.com/watch?v=PrTzpjMqg1Q

>be Bourbon nigger
>only in power because your Anglo-Germanic wanted you there
>only reason for existing is to show the peasantry of Europe that they'll never break free
>send army composed of lower-class soldiers to arrest leader of the Revolutionary Nation that was crushed by your Angloid masters
>surprised when they defect
serious question, was Louis XVIII retarded?

Attached: napoleon raptor.jpg (1000x1156, 266K)

he was a reactionary militant republican liberalist

whoa, so basically he hated people in general and especially the french people?? no wonder he attacked lots of other famous people (i just happened to read about euler) because he pretty much just hated everyone.

>Stalin of the French revolution
Thats Robespierre you dumb mutt

the only moment of clarity a monarchist has is when their head becomes unencumbered by the rest of their body

Based and redpilled

EDgy

He is literally the most charismatic person to have ever existed, there's nothing edgy about saying that.

I'm not saying he was a good person or that he was right - I'm stating a fact, he was - bar none - the most charismatic person, period.

Forgive my incursion, I have to agree on you with him being charismatic man. He reminds me of that one guy from the killzone franchise. Visari I think

For reference

youtu.be/Kiby2RBvFeE

>flag
>calling other mutts, mutts
Wew lad

>Speaking like a rage comic
Ok nerd

hwat aboujt finland

Robespierre=Lenin

Napoleon was a khv autist for quite a while
he gives hope to us all

Nice proxy

>republican liberalist

The hell is that

Reminder that Napoleone, the greatest frenchman in history, was Italian

A liberal who believes in a Republican form of government. That's pretty much all republicans, historically, actually.

Nah, the Moscow trials fit Robespierre much more with the Terreur

>At this time, he was a fervent Corsican nationalist, and wrote to Corsican leader Pasquale Paoli in May 1789, "As the nation was perishing I was born. Thirty thousand Frenchmen were vomited on to our shores, drowning the throne of liberty in waves of blood. Such was the odious sight which was the first to strike me

Attached: 1424956379267.jpg (640x633, 46K)

That part is more Stalin-like, but Stalin didn't pull the trials from nowhere. Terror was used by the Bolshevik government from the beginning.
I think Lenin and Robespierre are a better comparison because they both presided over the revolution's most radical phase (but still suppressed even more radical elements, like the Hebertists for Robespierre and Bukharin and the left communists for Lenin). They were both very fervently committed to their cause to the point that they lived obsessive, almost ascetic lives. Robespierre was the 'incorruptible', and Lenin basically worked himself to death. They also both at least ostensibly believed in liberty and democracy but convinced themselves that those things had to be temporarily suppressed for the sake of the revolution.
I think Napoleon and Stalin are a good comparison because they rolled back some of the revolution's more radical reforms. Napoleon restricted the rights of women, strengthened the middle classes, and reinstated the Catholic Church. Stalin repealed the complete legalization of abortion and recriminalized homosexuality, scaled back the dedication to world revolution, and ended some of the more eccentric Bolshevik experiments with art and culture. However they both maintained the fundamentals of the revolution. For Napoleon this was equality before the law, firm and secure property rights, the abolition of privilege and retention of a merit-based system. For Stalin it was socialization of the economy, and at least ostensibly the favoring in government of workers over the old regime's classes.
They also both presided over the rebuilding of their countries after the chaos of the revolution and revolutionary war, and lead them to massive military victories abroad.
That post got longer than I thought it would.

>no Brit has ever been as charismatic as Napoleon, Mussolini, Lenin or Hitler
What's wrong with Brits?

You could make the case for both tbqh (also I may be misremembering things, but Napoleon siezed a lot of the clergy's wealth and property during his rule, he still was really anticlerical), but it still was enlightened despotism under the empire, Robespierre seems way more extreme in some ways.

Because they were immune from dictators, and the internal conflicts that plagued lesser nations, except for that one time.

Attached: Cromwell.jpg (700x472, 417K)

DAB ON EM NIGGAS
DAB EM

Well Washington was technically a brit
Also Churchill and his great great grandpa

Neither of them are as charismatic as the men the aussie listed

Very bluepilled and cringe

They are considered charismatic because they successfully convinced a populace to follow them. So if said populace are, for example, retarded fucking sheep rather than high IQ intellectuals then they're going to have far more success with the same amount of charisma.

>Brits are high IQ and not sheeple like those damn Continentals
Brexit

Yeah I'm going to say it, fuck the a*gloids and fuck their perfidious little island.

>Staying in Germany's fourth Reich trade pyramid scheme
>Not sheeple

Where the napoleonic style wars the ultimate bugman wars? How much of a bugman do you have to be to stand in line waiting for your turn to get shot?

Just like phalanx. And for some reason Greeks considered it glorious to stand in the first lkne. What a bunch of bugmen

>win at Trafalgar, securing naval dominance
>bomb Copenhagen just to be sure
*dabs on continentals*

Attached: pirate stride.gif (360x242, 384K)

phalanx kinda makes sense (not much) because you are in melle but this stuff where they stand 20 meters from each other and they shoot, reload, shoot, reload, die, next, shoot, reload in an open field. Wtf is that shit meme warfare?

Well seeing as how it allowed euro armies to fight much larger foreign armies and win I'd say it worked well

starving zulus with sticks that dont go boom boom dont count ahmed.

>proxy
That is clearly one of your brave military personnel, you should be thanking him for his service.

I was talking about Turks and Indians but Africans also count

Actually it didnt work well cause back then all of them (zulus, indians, turks, etc.) were so decadent that it should have gone better.