Why do africans trigger this much autism?

yeah sticks and rocks are much less barbaric

fixed you ignorant

Attached: 154007959.png (519x810, 307K)

Winged Hussars' szabla

Attached: husaria18KRS_cala_z_pochwa.jpg (3259x980, 1.64M)

If your sword isnt curved your doing something wrong

it's a kpinga, it's designed for throw.

>swords
Pikes are where its at. They dont even get your clothes dirty with their blood.

Or bows, obviously...

its all about the falcatta

Attached: falcata-with-lion-heads.jpg (800x751, 123K)

The fuck are you supposed to do with a curved sword when the average man at arms has a chainmail, a helm and a shield? they were completely useless in western europe

>not a 6,2 meter long lance

Attached: ic8ktkpTURBXy8wZmJkNTllYTA2MTFmYjMxZGI3NzA4M2ZlYmQ3MGE0My5qcGeSlQMAVc0Np80HrZMFzQMUzQG8.jpg (788x444, 195K)

>African Swords
Akrafena (Ghana)
Bakatwa (Zimbabwe)
Billao (Somalia)
Flyssa (Algeria)
Ida (Nigeria)
Kaskara (Chad, Eritrea, and Sudan)
Khopesh (Egypt)
Mambele (Congo)
Nimcha (Morocco)
Shotel (Ethiopia)
Takoba (Most of Northern and Western Africa)

space age sword

Attached: img_ms_gundam_sandrock.png (470x470, 152K)

it's a reaction to the PC attempt to make africans equal and important in the history lessons for example at elementary school we are taught about Mali and Songhai and ALLLLLL the important black inventors in the US, and Frederick Douglass, and WEB DuBois, etc

fuck niggers (as a group), they didn't achieve shit in the past 500 years

>they didn't achieve shit in the past 500 years
they ruined a bunch of major cities in the US and Europe, that's something

Attached: finnish sword.jpg (323x749, 19K)

>Why do africans trigger this much autism?

Racism was never based in logic.

you can't "base" something in logic

logic is a truth preservation system. You can use logic in combination with facts, but it's not like logic is a set of beliefs.

That being said racism is quite logical. The Romans and Greeks just straight up slaughtered most of the people they conquered to make their genome more relatively important. Good on them!

>avg man
pretty sure most "avg men" couldn't afford armor.

You want me to give you english lessons Jose? I said average MAN AT ARMS not average MAN
Jesus Christ

>That being said racism is quite logical.

Not at any point in human history has racism or any other type of blanket discrimination been logical. It's based on pure hearsay and anecdote, just people making shit up and pointing fingers.

fucking hate Le Rational STEM internet nerd's obsession with very simplistic logic

guess it depends who your fighting, then

swords were mostly for show or as a backup. 99% of men had spears in all wars that used melee combat. the lucky ones had a sword to use as back up, but it was never a significant enough investment to any military.

additionally, Africa is a massive continent, land locked and with a massive desert splitting it from the rest of the world, while rough, mountainous terrain isolated Africans from each other.

lastly, Africans along the coast did use swords influenced by Mediterranean and middle eastern peoples.

the greeks and romans did nothing like that. the Greeks didn't really do any conquering like that in general, but when they did win wars, they took slaves, and banged their slaves all the time.

and the romans just forced those conquered to submit to their rule, and pay tribute. they didn't purge anyone except for the one city-state of Carthage. The rest of the Phoenician people were subjugated or enslaved.

racism is based on the primal fear that a pack of humans that don't belong to your pack want to steal your food. we no longer live as pack animals, so racism has no logic. it's pure emotion.

curved swords are a cavalry weapon. and most effective against troops with light armor. against better armored foes you fare better with a lance and a hammer. if you arent on a horse or loose it a classic european style sword allows more anti armor tactics like halfswording and mordhau. when heavy armor fell out of favor due to guns sabers took over for cavalry.

sword is a garbage weapon.
based africans

I never learned about Mali or Songhai in school
Why would you not learn about Douglass or DuBois? They were pretty important figures in American history.

id probably go for a spear or a pike at that point

you usually dont fight peasants. peasant army against peasant army was not at all common in the middle ages. its waste of peasants. wars were common due to feudal disputes and usually not that bloody (with notable exceptions).

africans at least sub saharans had straight double edged sword

>Turkic Kilij
the absolute biggest weapon against wh*Tes literally created by Allah himself
One say the prophet hated wh*tes so much that his kilij had three ends, one more than the one of Hz. Ali

>Why would you not learn about Douglass or DuBois? They were pretty important figures in American history.

Because white men are the only people worthy of being learned in school and anything outside of that is liberal rabble rousing.

>szabla
Polish is so funny language.

Attached: Cat girl do her smug.jpg (303x269, 68K)

this
youtube.com/watch?v=U6UWWRgUgWs

Spears are THE weapon for pre-gunpowder warfare. Africans knew this, Europeans knew this, everyone knew this.

1. Average levy soldier could not afford armor
2. Reliance on spears and arrows as primary weapons.
3. Blunt force trauma.

this board really is reddit
why cant hiroyuki just kill this shit site already

I read somewhere that it was useless, slow, unbalanced and hard to swing. But with that look it scared even the most veteran of the roman soldiers and only for that it was so effective, the romans were scared as fuck