Map of state governors by eye color

>but because of resources

But Mexican lands had actually way more resources, especially gold, silver, iron etc.

>a far larger population

Why did people want to immigrate in the US, not in Mexico then?

>a much better equiped army

Another sign of their advantage. Why did the US have a better equipped army?

All your arguments are not the REASONS, but RESULTS.

You're like "America defeated us because it was better" while I ask WHY it was better even though at the beginning of the 19th century no one would've said the US would be ever anything stronger than Mexico.

Just like no one would have said the UK would be able to conquer half of the world. The question is - why they had such a technological and institutional advantage over the world, why only whites had it, not Indians, not Aborigines but whites.

Sure, you can always bring up arguments like "civil wars", "diseases", "climate" etc. but in fact it doesn't matter. Brits turned both hot Australia and cold Canada into rich and developed states and didn't look for silly excuses. If there were Mexicans or Poles put in charge there they would be poor and messy countries and people like you would prove on Jow Forums "you know, it's all about climate, no matter who'd rule in Australia and Canada they would always be poor, believe me!"

And civil wars is actually a silly argument as well, first of all - if your country faces a civil war every decade, there's something wrong with your people. That's another advantage of white nations, they can easily get over petty issues and start to cooperate when it's needed. If Latinos, Slavs or Indians can't do it - that's their problem and the reason why they're inferior.

>19th century Sweden had to make alcohol a state monopoly because peasants were starving themselves using potatoes to make vodka,

Making alcohol a state monopoly was actually a very progressive solution and soon a lot of countries followed it.

>and your Germanic peoples are responsible for some of the worst crimes in history regardless of what anyone else may have done.

These crimes were seen as progressive back then. Pretty much every European nation wanted to "get rid of" Jews and Germans found the most "effective" way to do it. They invented death camps and this whole "machine of death", something only a very organized and disciplined nation could do. Yes, it was horrible, but it was actually a proof of their high technological level.

>All fo them, we had the Indian wars in the north, the caste war in Yucatán, the Mexican American war, the French intervention, the Reforma wars, even the godamn pastry war...

The US waged a lot of wars as well.

>Why do Mexicans worship white people?

because spanish kings were wh*Te

>that key

>But Mexican lands had actually way more resources
The US became independent in 1776, they fought until 1783, that means they were already ahead something close to 4 decades when Mexico became independent in 1821, no wealth was produced during our 11 year independence war and everything prior to that was taken by Spain which prohibited migration into Mexico.

Not that migration helped us in Texas.

You're oversimplifying and strawmaning my argument with that rant about the British and climate when it's really very simple when it comes to the Mexican American war, the US had a population of 20 million, we had 8 million, the US had been independent at that that point for more than twice as long as we had been, they were also far more experienced at war eg the Barbary war or the war of 1812.

Seriously, it's not that we both started at the same point in time with the same advantages, that goes for all huiman history. And might does not make right which your argument implies, if so then according to the great replacement conspiracy theory the "white" race deserves to die whatever their accomplishments because they do not posses the reproductive fitness to stay above replecement rate.

You can't have your cake and eat it too, either biological determinism is real or not and demographically speaking Africans would inherit the earth and you'd be forced to admit they were the mustard race after all because you don't care about reasons but results.

Or you know we could discuss reality and not racist theories with no real basis on actual science.

We don't all drink ourselves to death if we have booze freely available

Attached: alcohol-disorders-map.jpg (1081x810, 93K)