Attention

Funny thing is I found this while searching about the ethnicity of ancient egyptians. They were described to be of copper colored skin, Black people argue that they had dark skin hence they were black but in that passage about india he clearly distinguished between Black and brown. Hence Ancient Egypt was more or less like modern day egypt but since it was the center of the world back then it had alot of immigrants and was quite diverse

Yeah, historically Africa was reffered to as the North Part of Africa which is Morroca, Tunisia, Egypt etc while the black part of africa was called Ethopia

*Abyssinia, thats were the word for nigger in our languages comes from "habsi" as the noble men owned ethiopian slaves

Pakistan Zindabad!

He wasn't.

He was and it was by a big black cock

Big Dravidian Cock *

Dravidians don't have big cocks so no.

that link is an atrocity my brown friend

You'd know, gayboy

Daily reminder that Aryans are the real shitskins in the Indian subcontinent

Attached: 1539293427464.png (3818x4600, 719K)

Ever watched a tamil movie my abbysinian?

they actually have the 2nd smallest penises in the world according to a worldwide study so...

Looking up dicks, huh, gay paki?

It wan't Alexander who said that. It was some Greek philosopher who traveled across India.

That doesn't disprove them being black. It makes sense Egyptians being lighter than the Ethiopians(Nubians) south, but they were still the western concept of black which has varying skin tones. They still had woolly hair, they still share a common linguistical ancestor with other blacks. Egyptian language has very similar demonstrative pronouns to Somali. Left one is Egyptian, right one is Somali:

pn = kan, this (masculine)
tn = tan, this (feminine)
pf = kaas, that (masculine)
tf = taas, that (feminine)

Meanwhile in the Semitic language of Arabic the demonstrative pronouns are haathaa, haathihi, thaalika, tilka which is different.

Pic related are Egyptian spearmen. Are they really not black? I do agree that Egypt was multicultural but with the evidence I have, I think that they were mostly black. This thread is probably going to get removed once I post or my comment will be removed like in those /his/ threads I posted in.

Attached: 94930214.jpg (800x703, 79K)

Because ancient egypts were not Black, if they are then so are North Indians

Most indians look like pic you posted except for a few upperclassmen like pic related who look middle eastern but not black

Attached: images.jpg (554x554, 22K)

most north indians look like gulfies you aren't aware of what you are talking about

People in pakistan are all fairskinned, thats not the same for india, also you need to consider the fact that people living in pakistan back then were dindus and skin colour only changed to what we see today a few hundred years ago with the rise of the mughal empire

Whats a gulfie? All my indian friends are from the north and only one is white

Gulfie means arabs from the gulf countries. They look more or less the same

Can you post some fancy graphs n sheit im not convinced

somalians basically

youtube.com/watch?v=ul09eb4eYf4

Attached: 1533908047098.jpg (714x749, 184K)

>Chad Pakistan soldier

>Virgin "Walkie talkie in pocket" wahhabist clone battle drone

that map clearly shows the aryan states are the richest, central india isnt aryan and they're definitely your nigger brothers in blood

north india is a very broad term

people in kashmir, punjab, haryana, delhi/chandigarh, himachal and uk have pretty fair skin and are ethnically the same as most pakistanis

anything south than delhi and it gets weird, only the upper castes have the bollywood tier skin

Ahahaha nice delusions. Pajeet alert.

>people in kashmir, punjab, haryana, delhi/chandigarh, himachal and uk have pretty fair skin
yeah like 10 - 15% of them kek

Attached: nigger_caste_population.png (1200x1352, 525K)

They do if not lighter skin than the rest of India. But the main thing is that their facial structure is more caucasoid especially for kashmiris

subhuman with inferior genetics alert

but we do, you dumb BIMARU

>10-15%

AHAHAHA, biharis migrating to delhi don't count. A dog born in a stable doesn't become a horse. I'm talking only about the native population

nah africa is just modern tunisia+some parts of libya and algeria
morocco was called mauretania egypte was called egypt and antyhting south with black people was called ethiopea

punjab is 30% dalit/nigger population you dumb faggot what the fuck are you even on about lol

Bangali are not North Indians. They are East Indians.

Those SC are labourers migrated from U.P, Bihar and Jharkhand.

>implying 30% of the state population are labourers
LMAO regardless punjab is now the nigger central of india. And we'll keep zerg rushing you and you can't do anything about it. Those people are there to stay faggot.

>t. Bimaru

Sure, that still leaves 70% of Punjab to be ethnic punjabi

doesn't even include himachal, haryana (East punjab) or delhi/ncr and uk

your 10-15% number is absolutely retarded

I was talking about UC. Don't forget that your state is infested with turbaniggers. And there's no way a nigger-tier state like punjab has more than 10% brahmin population.

So what?