Why did the conquistadors racemix with the natives more than the anglos did?

They didnt come with families and had a larger native population than Canada and the U.S.

Wrong
"according to church and censal registers from the colonial times, the majority (73%) of Spanish men married with Spanish women."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexicans_of_European_descent
They did have a choice

thirsty muslim subhumans.
No moral or values at all, so they fucked the first thing they saw (after themselves)

Do you consider yourself Brazilian?

Because they didn't want to import millions of niggers like the anglos and Portuguese did. Reminder that Europeans never settled in tropical areas with the exception of Australia. Instead they always filled warm territories with negroe slaves. Spaniards were the only ones that used the natives are are ironically the least bad colonizers

high test

HOLY JESUS

Attached: JNSG.png (1365x800, 2.47M)

Did they marry the natives or just pump and dump them?

Conquistadors (and the spanairds that went after them) Racemix with the natives because the Spanish crown didn't automatically and unapologetically steal the natives land, contrary to popular belief.

What the conquistadors did were to overthrow a ruling class (normally the men monarchs and their children) and after they overthrew these people, stablish themselves on top. To maintain power they married a lot of indigenous women nobles.

This happened to the Aztecs and Incas and all the small cultures that were dwarfes by these empires.

Also a lot of conquistadors who didn't cut the "new noble" roles had lots of concubines and by 50 years of each conquest the mestizo population was around 20-30% in those places

Attached: Mestizaje maligno.jpg (855x1066, 770K)

Yes, because it's a nationality

What would you say your race is then?

Learn English,wetback

I’m just asking you what your race is? Geez

both

What I don't understand is why there are so many Amerindians and people with heavy Amerindian blood from Mexico downward. They're very rare to non-existent up here. Wtf was Spain thinking. Just imagine how nice it'd be.

Weren’t our natives mostly killed off through disease and wars?

The Spanish colonies were purely extractive, natives were integrated into it to be a lower class and also it was governed like shit as long as the gold kept coming. Anglo colonies were parallel societies.

What makes you think that they did? Pretty much all of the Mayan here are pure Mayan. A few have mixed with Latinos or gringos but it is pretty rare.

I’ve only seen a few latinos that look like pure natives. Most seem to be mixed.

Attached: D7FBC3ED-401F-47E4-A08E-B6757F490073.jpg (2048x1536, 593K)

Go to bed Francisco

There were around 30 million natives in Mesoamerica alone, even when 98% of them died due to smallpox, etc, there were still a fuck ton of them left.

America and Canada barely had any in comparison, specially considering the size of their countries.

anglos didn't reach any empire, so there were a very smal native population in their lands.

spaniars conques the local empires, and their huge populations.

That makes sense since the North American natives were mostly nomadic tribals.

That looks like Equador. Here are some Kaqchiquel girls from Patzicia.

Attached: b7020a74156cf75e0a79dc3a335d96a5.jpg (640x427, 84K)

Hey, user, I heard you family is on their way to America, they're in Mexico right now.

Spain conquered lands to spread catholicism. The fastest way to do this is to marry into the population and spawn little christcucks. Britain conquered lands primarily for trade and mercantile reasons due to its huge navy but small land army. Britain achieves this by bribing and blackmailing native kings and chiefs and also divide and conquer tactics. They have no need or even want to intermarry the natives since it means they will have to protect the families with expensive soldiers.

So where exactly do south American women get their curves from? Black slaves, natives or Spaniards & Portuguese?

Attached: portugal2.webm (1280x720, 1.89M)

why is the paternal ancestry of mexican and latin american in general mostly european while the maternal ancestry is overwhelmingly indigenous or african, then?

spider bites

I'm pretty sure Spain conquered lands to acquire gold to fund their Crusade against Morocco.

Attached: isabella.jpg (404x396, 41K)

You heard wrong britbong

Attached: 17f.jpg (674x454, 51K)

Maybe because some native women are attractive? It ceratinly wasn't because there were no European women

Because the anglos colonized land inhabited by stone age tribes with low populations that were wiped out by disease.

The anglos brought Anglo men and women who bred with each other rapidly with high birth rates.

The Spaniards conquered civilized amerindians with high population densities and sent mostly men to the colonies who had no choice but to marry natives. While They established cities and towns they mostly retained amerinidian cities and towns that already existed.

Wew lad,I finally saw a good post.

There is a bunch of pure "mayans" here, friend of 2 or 3.

anglos are impotent compared to MED BVLLS

But they did mix with natives. That's why U.S. natives are mestizos

Based Francis telling Swarthy Spaniards how it is

from $$$

>anglos didn't reach any empire
I hate this stupid meme. We defeated the Mughals, who were far more powerful than any civilization the Spaniards ever faced in their empire-building.

All women in the world belong to the Iberian man. Why do you think everyone in the world wants Southern Europeans?

Attached: 1522101076812.png (1304x613, 1.23M)

Surgery? Doubt it.

Attached: portugal.webm (1280x720, 1.28M)

im talking about america.

i bet that your people impregnate a lot of indus, but thy were so many that it didn't make any change.

>Talking about the conquest of America

BUUTTTTTTTTTT MY PAKISSSSS LAD

>Have a bunch of lower class workers
>Have a social and economic system that oppresses them
>Have a bunch of hot women that have no judicial representation/power

Imagine being sent by the Spanish crown, having to marry some boring spanish woman probably for political reasons, and coming to a place where you can fuck as many natives as you can so long as you can keep yourself alive.

God I wish I was Portuguese and could go to Brazil to pick up some big bunda bitches easily. Do they also use the wrod "bunda" in Portugal the same way they do in Brazil?

Attached: Shocked.png (353x292, 258K)

honestly if they have ridiculous asses they probably have silicon in them

What Venezuelans, Brasilians, some caribbeans and some Colombians have is great shapely legs made by the constant sun, heat and humid weather. Shapely legs = great ass, not big ass.

Anglos are stuck up spergs, Spaniards are based southern chads

it's all implants/silicone and fat replacement

brazilians have big thighs because they inject T and work out

No, cu.

Basado

Because there were way more Spanish males than females in the colonies and the native population had been reduced greatly because of diseases.

The spanish bull vs the british virgin

Anglos practiced frontier of exclusion while the spanish practiced a frontier of inclusion. Plus the spanish system was based on race while the anglos were more class based.

anglos are nazis

actually it's more european than african
the mtDNA breakdown is roughly 60% native, 23% european and 17% african, while the y-dna is 70% european

basically for every 4 spanish men that came only 1 spanish woman came, which isn't honestly so bad

Attached: main-qimg-c27b77f2c8957fbaa2ca7d5cbea27c95-c.jpg (566x762, 76K)

>us hispanic represents all of latin america
brainlet

where the fuck are you going to get more general and representatives than that made on US hispanics dumbfuck?
Btw on most of these U.S hispanics studies the criteria is first generation, and if anything the huge amount of mexicans in the US would drop the european mtDNA, not raise it

>Anglos invested some of their best people into colonising North America.
loled. You must be out of your god dam mind, the early settlers where indebted servants who where owned by companies that paid for their tickets to the new world.

>mayans
>pure
I'm sorry user, aside from native amazoneans most of them are mutts

Attached: axxsxs.png (2001x1159, 154K)

latino immigrants don't represent latin america especially due to the caste system

just take venezuela as an example.

The U.S. gets rich white Venezuelans of Spanish or other European ancestry while all of the other latino countries get shitty low class uneducated creature abominations

you are retarded LOL
the US gets the shittiest bunch of immigrants specially among central americans, you guys are actually making mexico whiter by recieving so many of their cholos and having so many american expats living in mexico (biggest migratory group in mexico is american-mexicans)

because spaniards aren't maniacal genociders like the anglos

because race and peoples place in society was more complex to "then brown is bad" you mongrul
>look up casta paintings

Attached: Casta_1_Cabrera.jpg (643x845, 94K)

How the hell would Mexican-American immigrants in Mexico make Mexican whiter if they are supposedly poor indigenous as you claim? And that still wouldn't be true because indigenous people have high birth rates in Mexico and migrate to western and northern Mexico to work in factories and farms.

maybe tits or nose, butt surgery isn't common here

t. I grew up watching teenage girl with asses like that

don't judge, I was a teenager too.

American mexicans =! Mexican Americans
nearly 1 million americans live in Mexico, more than in Canada and Europe combined, actually more than anywhere in the world combined, most live in cities like Jalisco, DF or Moneterrey and a lot of them live in Baja California, most of them are anglo americans that emigrated as product of the consolidation of economies between the two countries specially with NAFTA.

>indigenous people have high birth rates
completely false, while it's true that the lower middle class tends to have more kids than the upper middle class once you get under the poverty line people in latin america drop birthrates a lot, specially considering natality death rates.

Also in general latam has low birth rates and we are predicted to go below the replacement rate between 2020 and 2030, son any migratory movement will defenitely shape the genetics of the population more.

Attached: 12.jpg (482x611, 34K)

The majority of the American immigrants in Mexico are Chicanos and even if they were Whites they still wouldn't make Mexico whiter because they're all old as fuck retirees who don't breed.

Indigenous people in Mexico specifically have higher birth rates than other ethnic groups and they migrate northward to work in Toyota and other car factories.

According to this Peruvian, Mexico is somehow becoming whiter thanks to:
- Having a large Amerindian population that is increasing and migrating everywhere
- Hosting a bunch of Haitian and Central American immigrants that tried to get into the U.S. and failed so they chose to stay
- An increase in Chinese immigrants who are migrating to expand trade and increase Chinese imports

Eres el peruano pituco?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Mexico#Foreign-born_population_by_country_of_birth

look at the top 10, aside from guatemala all other countries are certainly whiter than mexico
>increasingly amerindian population
false, as I already explained
>hosting central americans
aside from guatemalans.. its irrelevant
>chinese inmigrants
not even in the top 20 migratory groups into mexico

>old as fuck
not really, most are gen X within working age and are raising their kids in mexico or simply married into mexican families

because the Spanish were hornier from being repressed by catholicism, the kinkiest religion.

>aside from native amazoneans most of them are mutts
>A single dna study represents all native americans
There's actually not been many studies on native american genetics, that's a generalization and if being 10%~ from another race makes you a mutt then most of humanity are mutts

>you guys are actually making mexico whiter by recieving so many of their cholos and having so many american expats living in mexico (biggest migratory group in mexico is american-mexicans)
The most indigenous states in Mexico are the southern ones but most of the immigrants come from the central states (pic related)

>completely false, while it's true that the lower middle class tends to have more kids than the upper middle class once you get under the poverty line people in latin america drop birthrates a lot, specially considering natality death rates.
Why should that be the case? Poor people tend to have more children, even considering infant mortality. Africa is the poorest continent on Earth yet they have the fastest growing population too.

Attached: migracin-en-estados.jpg_624x351.jpg (624x351, 29K)

vocaroo.com/i/s18bYTqc4RAV

Granada, not Morocco. The point of Columbus' trip was finding trade routes with chinks that wouldn't need to cross the Ottoman empire, to finance the war in Granada.

They don't really. They're mostly brown, short and squat.