>deserts filled with anglos are more successful than 99.98% of countries on the planet
Deserts filled with anglos are more successful than 99.98% of countries on the planet
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Such as?
Job completed Bruce, come home now.
my country you dumb cartel nigger.
nice proxy lad
>deserts
its true but the difference isn't mainly intelligence and the preceding social advantages, people here have no sense of communal cooperation and prosperity
Anything that requires systematic construction and maintenance inevitably fails because people work for themselves primarily and short-term, and there's no guarantee of equal representation with that.
apologize for the shitty wording but its how I could get it across
I find this weird that northern euros are supposed to be more individualist yet they manage to have much stronger community projects while more "communal" societies are full of backstabbing and half assed jobs (including here)
>a*gloids
>living on a desert
You all huddle on the banks of the few lakes and other habitable regions you have, Bruce. Only abbos and other misfits live in the Outback.
I used to think it was more openness and accounability, and better long-term execution and planning skills but I am sure there's something deeper to their organization
My idea that because they are individualist they also have concepts of individual responsibility
So a German sees a problem and says "how can I fix this" or "this is my problem personally"
Meanwhile someone else from east or west Asia says "how can we fix this" or "this is someone else's problem" so there's never pressure for any one person to ever do anything this you end up with garbage and broken things everywhere
I know my uncle drive his car literally until it fell apart and was totally unusable, then just bought a new one instead of simply getting small repairs for the one he had.
I don't believe this exactly because you can hardly say Asian societies east and west lack long term planning or high levels of civilization
But there is a definite lack of personal responsibility
On the other hand this is why European feel guilty for everything in the world all the time
loaded question here, but can greater individualism lead to greater social responsibility?
I agree
Well, somebody has to be the adult in this relationship!
>its true but the difference isn't mainly intelligence
objectively wrong my inbred shitskin friend
No, just look at America
The alternative is you get people who simply don't care about any outside of their little plot of property
There are many factors, but I was wondering about communal oriented society in general because you mentioned them
then why are there white shitholes with high IQ
i don't think there are more than 5000 countries in the world.
inb4 programmatic answer: communism and western european exploitation
>filled with anglos
perfidious anglos are spreading misinformation again, the convicts settled a continent with a few ppl then came all sorts of ppl plus abos, and its a content with the size of my nation kek
based
And east Asia has higher IQ than Europe
Vietnam is poor as fuck with bad schooling but has higher IQ than Ireland
Yet Ireland is beautiful and I'd rather live there
alright smarty pants
Ireland was unironically in the 70s in mid-20th century, and around 84 a few decades ago, Lynn and co had to readdress it with all its social progress, especially now
Fucking idiot.
Name me one tropical country that Anglos succeeded in
Stop speaking about Australian history when you clearly have no fucking clue what you're talking about.
Anyone who vomits the "convicts" meme is a clueless moron.
Are you as wiped out as the pupper?
I don't know so much about Islam
But from what I do know in the past there was more an emphasis on personal striving and community but also your role as a pillar of the community
Like when I hear people talk about Jihad as a way of living every day
To me it sounds very similar to Dharma
Problem is buddhists here have been twisted so now your dharma doesn't matter so long as you leave offering to statues and pray extra hard and give monks money
All very silly imo
Australia
Florida
South Africa
Hong Kong
Singapore
All the islands with no blacks
To be honest the success and world dominance of English peoples goes way beyond anything mentioned here
I mention Germans as example, but Germans are histories loser
English have something extra
Was about to say exactly what you wrote at the end, politicized for political benefit and people have a superficial understanding of it, less principles and more dramatic action
Australia is a single fucking country, stupid fuck, and you don't live in the desert.
What do westerers consider above-average intelligence? (not racial, individual during daily dealings)
Consanguinity it's why Islam, Sunnae at least is stuck in the 7th century. IQ is fucked when you reproduce with your cousin or your brother's daughter. yes that is common. For generations Kufir girls are meat.
we're like 80% Anglo/Irish, there literally wasn't anyone from the British Isles moving here until the Italians and Greeks in the 60s. Even then our biggest migrant source is consistently England, which is supported by anglo Africans from South Africa and Zimbabwe moving here en masse too. Australia's actually very homogenous
Queensland is tropical
>strayan history
send in the colonial cucks first
Alright Wallachia. You're a tad swarthy btw. What happened?
Here it's not political at all because communism, just such drift away from the ideal that it's little more than spooky superstitions held together by a vaguely "Buddhist" framework.
Mixture with Christianity makes things even worse
For the most part here few people are even "religious" yet nearly everyone follows silly superstitious nonsense and magic all the time
So like my mum is an atheist but she also has to do a ritual all the time to keep house devils away and blames them for spoiling fruit and other thing lol