1. Your country

1. Your country
2. Does you country have a comfy place to live innawoods and by yourself?

Attached: Wizard Pepe.jpg (736x815, 35K)

99.9% of my cunt is like that

Can I join?

70% innawoods, 10% mountains, 20% steppe or halfdesert
doubt its comfy

No

If you want to live in complete wilderness without actual sanitary sewers, and get raped by snow and ice 180 days a year, be my guest.

1. Russia
2. Maybe, because my country have a lot of territory's

Sounds perfect

yes in fact we do, kiwi. I plan to buy myself a ''weekend house'' in the woods where I will spend my holidays larping as a medieval peasant

Attached: 0771fae3.png (1568x1081, 77K)

America
We have an entire state dedicated to those type of people

Attached: alaska.png (999x717, 49K)

Yes

Attached: chris mccandless.jpg (1920x1080, 247K)

Most villages in India would be kind of comfy if they has proper waste management and people pooed in the loo

Why is that?

Where exactly?

I wish New Zealand was further south, so we could have proper wilderness instead of a tourist playground. The cold would prevent most of them coming.

I've heard the South is pretty good; but I've only ever lived in Palmy/Hastings/Wellington

I'm in the South Island. I haven't been to the scenic regions such as Fiordland because of financial reasons. I would love to experience some of the greatest views on the planet, but I would have to dish out lots of money to go somewhere already chockfull of tourists, so I wouldn't feel the explorer sensation. Maybe someday when I have money to spare. Another thing is that I would love to experience snow, but New Zealand virtually none of that, except for in alpine areas, but places like Canada and Japan apparently get way deeper snowfall.

We do have, but I can't guarantee you won't have undesired guests.

you have tiny hills like this all over Panonija, the northern part of Croatia
next to it you have forests and vintages

Attached: zagorje-vinogradi--ivo-biocina-1-1_0.jpg (1600x900, 361K)

I feel like we get lots of tourists because normals want to experience rainforest, but without any dangerous animals. I feel that is a bad thing, as because if our native fauna was dangerous, it could fend for itself from introduced animals instead of being decimated. I wish our native animals were dangerous.

They'll all be in Texas and New Mexico soon enough anyway

Yes, but you gotta work it a bit to not die

What is Alaska like?

yes you big dumb

Attached: TAS.jpg (590x559, 50K)

I've heard it's a shithole though

good
it keeps people out

Do you live there?

yes

What's it like?

no

the west is wet, the east is dry, pick your spot.
Abos are extinct here and the ones that moved here work like everyone else.
No retarded Sydney traffic and stable relatively low power prices due to renewable energy. If the dams are empty then we steal from Vic. Best food quality in Aus followed by best restaurants. House prices are still going up here though, low quality roads and work is harder to find. North and west are best for tourist imo. Don't listen to mainlanders they are just jealous.
Tip: make Hobart you last place to go. Its Basically a Uni now.

Tasmania would be the best place to buy property for the future I reckon. You'll have millions upon million wanting to live there once climate change effects become very significant in the mainland.