What went wrong?

No, despite that one Brazilian shithead spamming that in every one of his threads.

"Mexican" was briefly a separate racial category but that was gotten rid of.

Redpilled: They picked the wrong side in WW2
Bogpilled: They picked the wrong side in WW1
Blackpilled: They won their independence war against the British Empire.

They were, and Indians were as well. I also know Filipinos were at one point considered white. We've definitely received a lot of immigrants in the last 50 years or so, but this picture is a bit disingenuous. The western coast has always had a lot of non-whites.

Muhammed...

coastal elites wanting to bring in minority scum because they know they'll get votes out of those stunted brown pygmies

Fuck you, it's bad enough that the Brazilian spams that shit.

haven't been in previous threads, I can understand blacks moving out of southern states shitting up the figures but I can't rationalise southwestern american states not having large hispanic populations at all even in the 1940s

Yeah, and the (((one percent))) can keep wages low with constant immigration.

Lol idk nigga

Attached: 1532290916128.jpg (245x249, 14K)

You have to remember that both Northern Mexico and the Southwestern US were nearly empty from 1840-1960.

>Immigrates
>Wonders why other ethnicities immigrate as well

Classic Amerimutt logic

>that beautiful all red texan border with rio grande

*sniff*

Attached: tenor.gif (498x490, 1.58M)

White Americans have been here since the 1600s. How long do we have to be here before we can claim "indigenous" status and not accept immigrants?

This was planned by the way. This didn't just happen. And it's going to happen in europe too. It is happening in europe.

It already happened in South Africa.

Shit status = No

HUwites BTFO

there was sricter inmigration control for non europeans before 1965

south africa was never majority white though.

>That Texas

youtube.com/watch?v=rM8tROzp4Dc

heard this line of thinking before elsewhere, I realise modern northern mexico is a desolate wasteland but my understanding is that there were non-insignificant hispanic/indian populations in the new mexico/arizona regions before secession that weren't counted in official figures due in part because of the tribes being hostile, I'll take your word for it though
ps, you weren't discussing the american border in an Jow Forums thread a couple of months ago were you? we might have talked about this before if so

I was thinking more preexisting populations, especially indian, but I realise that might be a little silly now in retrospect

Only on the far east ... You bought the rest from the land in the 19th century, and from there conquered the west. So yeah literally yesterday.

But this isn't the point. As long as your corporations and your govern continue to destabilize countries you'll have immigrants

Attached: 1540183925858.jpg (3300x1619, 2.62M)

...

that is a lie, since always South Texas has have a fuck load of Mexicans, they were considered white for some reason in the past
I don't see nothing wrong with that 2bh, I see it as something possitive since hat means more people have more opportunities

...

>>>/mlpol/

...

i've been in Beaumont and Port Arthur, can confirm you that there's a lot of black people in there
the map is wrong

There were never any quotas on Mexican or Latin American immigration. It's a common misconception. Hart-Cellar only lifted the restrictions on Asian and African immigration.

this but unironically

you started the same thread on Jow Forums.

it dies

so you start another here?

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

>During debate on the Senate floor, Senator Kennedy, speaking of the effects of the act, said, "our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. ... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset".[12]

The Kennedys are garbage.

Hispanic immigration picked up in the 60s after the Democrats passed a bill (sponsored by jewish senators) removing immigration restrictions on people of non-European ancestry

>However, the ethnic composition of immigrants changed following the passage of the law. >Specifically, the Hart–Celler Act allowed increased numbers of people to migrate to the United States from Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.
>The 1965 act, however, imposed the first cap on immigration from the Americas.
>This marks the first time numerical limitations were placed on legal immigration from Latin American countries including Mexico.

How can this ever be reversed? Is America (and Europe) fucked in the long term?

Not looking forward to when i'm in my old age and in a country where 50% of the population is black or brown desu. But it will happen

So what made them emigrate so much after the 60s in there were never any major restrictions?

idk, population growth probably. Plus back in the day the border was incredibly fluid to the point where you didn't really even need to 'immigrate' for work. You could just come back and forth as you pleased.

at least your countries become fascists again and expulse all immigrants, then it will happen
but it's not fucked, simply you'll have more people from different backgrounds, that's it

> simply you'll have more people from different backgrounds, that's it

this is a lie and you know it.