yeah i just addressed it. Anyone is free to try to run a node on a raspberry pi. I'm not surprised when 25 percent of the network is running on the equivalent of a pi.
It's like bringing a ford pinto to a drag race and being surprised when it loses the race.
The real question is if honda civics will be able to handle 2000 tps.. so far no one has produced a stress test to bring down the average nodes with more than 2 GB in memory down.
16 tps is not the network capacity, it was the sender capacity, since transactions are limited by POW, which is designed to be difficult.
Still waiting for this shitcoin to go up
It's a 2014 shitcoin that got pumped and dumped on a fraudulent exchange and reddit became obsessed with this scam spamming how its NEW TECHNOLOGY
Its a broken shitcoin that has never worked correctly on exchanges
EOS is an ERC20 token and it doesn't even try to be decentralized
Wrong on so many levels. All blocks are voted on; verifying a tx can be done for tens of thousands of tps. You don't know shit what you're speaking about. Stay fudding, faggot
Hunting the ATL on Nano
It already happened. It'll only go up from here
I held from ATH to now, IT IS PERSONAL NOW, choose your weapon.
I might be wrong about that.
That doesn't change the fact that In order for Nano to succeed and scale representatives have to have a reason to run powerful hardware on nodes.
The current limitation of tps is a hardware limitation of writing data to the disk, not a protocol limitation. As hardware improves, so will the tps limit.
Unless you can day trade really well in this bear market youll just have to hold and wait a year or two for the gains you want.