Press F

Media says, can't find her tho.

I'm sure it's shallow enough water that they can salvage it.

2mins of Radio audio.

twitter.com/Air_4U/status/1061503526277472256

>Function: anti-submarine warfare
Fucking kek

Half a billion.

What a shame.

That ship is trying to understand his enemies better

After all these accidents i'm surprised nobody thought of using those fuckhuge cargo ships as warships. Like, just go full Kirov on it and fill it with missiles, cannons, CIWS and all the eletronics possible.

rip

Attached: helge.jpg (1024x683, 203K)

>not even close
we lost all 28 fighters (2 billion usd) in a JSDF base by Tsunami

Attached: TKY201109150258.jpg (500x259, 98K)

>parking your jets in notorious risky zones
Muricans did the same mistake lately, they lost a dozen F-22. You share the same doctrine after all.

Some can be salvageable tho, or at least get cannibalized for parts.

Well the hull, my bet is the electronics are damaged the engines must be drowned and filled with salty water which can cause a lot of damage

Were they mostly F-2s? If so, tsunami did you a favor.

To sum up this military exercise;

>American troops empty Iceland's beer supply
>Norwegian sailors sink own flagship by collision with oil tanker
>Swedish artillerymen triangulate position of norwegian missile battery using Tinder and destroy it (in the context of the wargame)

A good time had by all

Now imagine what would happen in a all out war.

We fought one of the norwegian ships IRL not that long ago and they got dabbed on pretty hard.

youtube.com/watch?v=bYFMZ_wuqXI

>Swedish artillerymen triangulate position of norwegian missile battery using Tinder
This timeline ffs...

>From December 2013 to May 2014, Helge Ingstad was one of the escort ships for merchant vessels carrying chemical weapons from Syria to be destroyed.

Attached: images.jpg (459x278, 12K)

Assad curse strike once again.

As in; the norwegian crewmen were using their phones with Tinder on it, and the swedish artillery men used it to find the general area in which the missile battery was located, and sent out scouts to report the exact coordinates as Tinder doesn't allow for precise triangulation to prevent stalkers and creeps.

The bigger the ship, the more expensive it is and funnily enough also easier to hit and sink.

Until we actually invent some sort of force field or shields (like in startrack), you want as many smaller ships as possible instead of one HUGE one. Because it really takes one better placed missle and it is all lost.

Attached: 1542094340067.jpg (1080x1261, 306K)

>some sort of force field or shields
>Because it really takes one better placed missle and it is all lost.
considering the issue is water leaking in and not the structural damage, the best use of these shields would be to plug holes in the hull instead of preventing impact

How come soldiers are allowed to carry their fucking smartphone ? Let them play with fireworks when you're at it.

Attached: XVM0199b378-67de-11e7-8c12-a695e61ec102.jpg (1280x580, 113K)

it was a missile battery, they already were playing with fireworks

S

It was probably only made possible by the fact that it's an exercise.

>Let them play with fireworks when you're at it.
It's the army. That's what they do.

Have you ever seen any footages from naval battles during WW2? Most ships burned to the "ground" faster than they sunk. Army for some weird reason loves to fill their ships, tanks and planes with fuel and various ammo which is all super explosive and flammable :-)

Sinking ship happens mostly when you ram two ships into each other, not when two armies clash into each other on open seas.

Attached: 95trajekt.jpg (800x600, 472K)

I was under the impression sinking is the main issue in the modern age because fire suppression has improved and people stopped storing ammo like a bunch of retards

US pays out $2m after minesweeper damages protected reef
theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/18/us-pays-out-2m-after-minesweeper-damages-protected-reef

Attached: img_586ba6c9ca99d6cf66dab8551d93b2bc184896.jpg (810x538, 120K)

Also the lost of a huge capital ship is devastating to a county’s morale

We need another war to see if modern navy is actualy fire proof. Personally i doubt it. The war ships still have to be filled full with ammo in order to shoot the bad guys.

And when any battery on ship gets hit, all the ammo there will go off in a violent fashion.
>fire suppression
More like explosion suppression. Also dont forget all armies around world are developing anti armor rounds...

This is an outrage. We could have had an extra week of immigration for that money.

>And when any battery on ship gets hit, all the ammo there will go off in a violent fashion.
iirc ammo is far more compartmentalised in modern ships, like it is in modern tanks meaning it is harder to get it to go off and it wil fuck up the ship less if it does
modern munitions are also less prone to unintended activation than old ones
but yes, there is not enough practical experience to say if what has been attemped will actually work
>explosion suppression
an explosion is just a really fast fire desu