>Girl, bye.
Why do French "people" do this?
Girl, bye
Other urls found in this thread:
www1.nyc.gov
twitter.com
why are french people so cringe
stop twisting the knife in the wound
>calling Trump a girl
Based, redpilled, and touched by God.
LUCAS MARTIN is speaking the truth though. Absolutely blackpilled retort.
Phrases like that trigger Conservacucks so much for some reason
It hurts the fragile masculinity of conservacucks
Why would anyone be proud about having gun control?
Because private guns do absolutely nothing but risk making the country a violent shithole.
What kind of retard would want everyone to have guns?
they need guns because they aren't living in a safe country
>Because private guns do absolutely nothing but risk making the country a violent shithole.
But that is explicitly false.
>What kind of retard would want everyone to have guns?
Oh I don't know, what kind of a retard would want people to have the right to own property or the right to protect their own life? Must be a really dumb idiot.
If you live in a safe country, what benefit is there in banning guns? People don't commit crime just because they have access to firearms.
not anymore cringy than based and redpilled
why would you need guns to protect your life if you live in a safe country then?
just admit you want guns to shoot shit in the woods to make your tiny peepee stand up for the first time in a decade
KWEEN SLAAAAAAAY
>blackwomennodding.gif
I like to shoot stuff, and I like hunting.
I also like to be able to actually defend myself if I'm attacked until the police show up.
there were a need of guns in a time when police forces didn't exist and when information couldn't be share quickly and easily, in modern era and developped countries, guns for public are useless.
>Girl, bye
What the fuck does that even mean? I swear I'm only 19 but sometimes I feel like the boomest of boomers
>why would you need guns to protect your life if you live in a safe country then?
For example, to protect against the people who'd like to take them away.
What's with the obsession about dicks, user?
Having guns in your country makes it much more dangerous to defend yourself..
but if you don't have them to begin with, who's going to take them away?
What's the average police response time in your country?
How can you stop a guy with a rifle in a nightclub (let's say) with information sharing?
It's ebonics
> I swear I'm only 19
Freacking zoomers
How? I'd much rather be in a situation where I have a gun and they have a gun rather than a situation where they have a knife and I have nothing.
If you don't have guns, then you're a slave and you've already lost.
like 5 to 10 minutes max
if the menace involves people handling guns, swat equivalent intervene..
you'll probably say that it's too long and you have time to get shoot multiple times but those cases are more than anecdotical.
mega-pussy
>being proud of gun control
betamale soycuck lmao
>I choose to be defenseless
>I choose to be a slave to the government
>I choose to ignore the foreign criminals that the laws and want to destroy my culture and people
my peepee stands up already, i need guns so the girl stands still
Having to brutally fight to the death is already a huge disencouragement for any attacker, pressing a trigger and either dying or killing someone is not.
What do you mean? Guns literally make the weak able to defeat the strong. They would make gypsies extremely dangerous if they were allowed into Romania.
>I choose to be defenseless
you are, a glock will not save your ass from a bunch of nigger also handling guns, the only risk you have is to get robbed AND killed.
>I choose to be a slave to the government
you are, the very moment you pay taxes makes you a goivernment bitch
>I choose to ignore the foreign criminals that the laws and want to destroy my culture and people
your culture is now nigger music, lgbt movies and europen larping food..
>like 5 to 10 minutes max
Okay, how much can happen in 5 minutes?
>you'll probably say that it's too long and you have time to get shoot multiple times but those cases are more than anecdotical.
You are correct, they are more than anecdotal. They're data.
>Having to brutally fight to the death is already a huge disencouragement for any attacker, pressing a trigger and either dying or killing someone is not.
No it's not. Getting to threaten an unarmed person is much easier than risking getting into a firefight. There's a reason why most attackers simply turn around and flee at the first sign of armed resistance, even if they have a gun.
They're fun to shoot, faggot
Never had to deal with niggers I see because they are massive pussies that only attack when they think they'll win. Having a fun will make them back down
Over here the government is for the people by the people, it isn't a puesdo monarchy like in France
Not our fault you eat up Hollywood crap and confuse it for culture
>you are, a glock will not save your ass from a bunch of nigger also handling guns, the only risk you have is to get robbed AND killed.
Yes it will. Niggers commonly turn the tail and run the moment they see a gun.
>you are, the very moment you pay taxes makes you a goivernment bitch
That's true, and it's a big problem as well. However that doesn't mean that we shouldn't start somewhere.
God i hate the free meme so much
someone pays for it its not free
how much people in France are killed with guns after being robbed ? a very few if not 0
the only death by guns are bun members vs other gaang members..
oh yes and terrorist attacks of course, but in that case how can you defend yourself vs a psychopat islamist surprising the shit out of you, even americans with gun controls are massively killed when a psychopat decides to make a rampage..
>gun control
ahah yea great
>our president sexually harasses Trump
>our people calls Trump a girl
b&r
&
r
>hunting is feminine now
This.
>shooting from 2km away in the safety of your hiding hole is manly
oh watch out real tough guy over here
How? Somebody pulls a gun on you, he can shoot at the first sign of movement from you.
Somebody pulls a knife on you, you can either fight him or try to outrun him.
Enjoy your third world murder rates, they sure are worth it so you get to click a button and watch a hole pop up on a wooden target every once in a while
>how much people in France are killed with guns after being robbed ? a very few if not 0
I don't know, you tell me. How many are stabbed?
>the only death by guns are bun members vs other gaang members..
Oh, so pretty much the same as in USA.
>oh yes and terrorist attacks of course, but in that case how can you defend yourself vs a psychopat islamist surprising the shit out of you, even americans with gun controls are massively killed when a psychopat decides to make a rampage..
Psychopaths go for the path of least resistance. That's why they shoot up schools or military bases where people are forbidden to carry. Yes, you can be surprised, but if you aren't, you at least have a chance to resist.
>every gun is apparently a sniper rifle
>nobody ever hunts on foot or tracks prey
Why are you making sweeping generalisations on a subject you know nothing about, have you ever even been hunting?
i have to go but i'll come back at you later to continue this nice debate
God I hate the someone pays for it it's not free meme so much
Everyone fucking knows that when someone receives a free service state and private companies pay for these services and the cost is distributed across the population
oh my bad, yeah I guess you could walk around for a bit, get in a general view of the animal and then shoot
>How? Somebody pulls a gun on you, he can shoot at the first sign of movement from you.
Or you draw and shoot when he expects movement, like when he tells you to give your wallet. If you are on gunpoint, you've already failed.
>Somebody pulls a knife on you, you can either fight him
No you can't. You really fucking can't. Knives are far more dangerous than guns in a scuffle.
>or try to outrun him.
Unlikely. Also what if you can't?
>Enjoy your third world murder rates, they sure are worth it so you get to click a button and watch a hole pop up on a wooden target every once in a while
They have around 50% of the billion civillian-owned guns in the world. Looks to me that your data doesn't indicate that they have 50% of the murders. Seems like you're going to have to get a new argument.
Yeah we should ban fishing poles and golf clubs too cause they're also boring activities in my opinion. Arrogant wop
holy fuck gun shills are so retarded
you're beyond help
Suicides are counted in those statistics.
The last bastion of white race against the most cucked EU member. GO GO GO PEKKA
Well if I'm so retarded, it shouldn't be so hard for you to come up with arguments. Sounds like you're just ignorant, so I won't hold it against you. Maybe look up facts next time?
That's intentional homicide, not "gun death". Intentional homicide doesn't include suicides.
ok, this is epic
The Romanian is afraid that Gypsies will ethnically cleanse them.
Here, "touched by God" is a euphemism for "retarded."
"You see, little Johnny's a bit touched, so go easy on him."
>the cost is distributed across the population
it's not though, it's distributed across the upcoming generation
>we have free stuff and no guns
>therefore we are better
Really makes you think.
bye girls
>a talking monkey
Really makes you think.
>gets gunned down by mudshits who doesn't give a fuck about gun laws
Yes, gun control doesn't stop people from getting guns illegally. But it makes it harder to get a gun in general.
There's a reason why France's murder rate is five times lower than that of the US.
>Yes, gun control doesn't stop people from getting guns illegally. But it makes it harder to get a gun in general.
>this is a good thing
Strict gun laws isn't why your murder rate is lower than the US. Otherwise Switzerland would be more dangerous than Mexico.
>if yer cunty have gun contral then why there are still guns in yur cuntry
>Free
No
>Gun control
Check Marseilles
>Girl
What a fag.
>its not free cuz you pay taxes wat no libtar
This question needs to be addressed
>gun control doesn't stop people from getting guns illegally
Then what's the fucking point? It's exactly that meme arguments the Americans make: making guns illegal doesn't prevent those who mean harm from acquiring them. It only prevents honest citizens from acquiring them.
This. They are not the condicio sine quae non. Reports from the New York Police show that simply Thanos snapping all non-whites out of the city would reduce gun crime by NINETY PERCENT. Show me ONE gun control policy with the same effectiveness. One.
www1.nyc.gov
Page 11/16 for those concerned with my source.
That's something you need to keep in mind though. Especially considering how far down the shitter your economy is and how shitty your "muh free" education is. Macron is wasted on you commies.
Macron is a piece of shit and also gay.
we also have the government telling us what we can do in every aspect of our daily lives, even the very vehicles we can hire to take us somewhere! ha ha, cope amierfat...
>non-black American women using black American women slang
Why does everyone do this? Especially homos.
i dont know it does not make sense, it doesnt even make sense if i translate it to french.
might be homosexualized urbanites and their new language i dont know
The point is to limit the amount of guns in circulation. And you can legally own a gun in France, anyway.
>she
God, I fucking hate France.
Why the fuck do white people always group Asians like me with the poor minorities causing the gun crime?
You think it's a bunch of Asians shooting each other up?
Americanization.
>The point is to limit the amount of guns in circulation
Yes, because they can get coke from abroad but not guns.
Read the report you fucking dipshit. I thought Asians were supposed to be smart.
being world superpower was truly a mistake
That takes a fuckton of skill and then you have to carry that bloodied corpse over your shoulders for a long distance sometimes in snow. It seems a lot more manly than jerking off to cartoons on a Cambodian weaving board.
>we're better off than you
>not the no 1 in the world
what did he mean by this?
>Use far away throwing stick not manly
>Grug not use far away throwing stick
>Grug use stabbing rock
>Cowardly grass eating meat run away from stabbing rock
>Grug stab cowardly meat eating meat instead
>Grug win but Grug got serious wound
>Grug get infection
>Shaman say cut off Grug arm
>Grug hunt never again
>At least Grug manly, unlike pansy throwing stick Grag
>Grag get all meat and all girls, but Grag not manly!
And hitlers driver was jewish so no holocaust
wat
As long as one person owns a gun you can weasel yourself on and on about how guns are legal even if it is practically impossible to own a gun for self-defense
There's also a reason why the places with most guns are the safest in the US.
Dont be retarded, the safest places in the US are the whitest. It just happends that those places have mostly lax gun laws. If you look at diverse places like the entire south theres lots of murder despite right-wing politicians defending the right to bear arms
this guy's tweet has so many trumptards triggered
>the state of Indonesia education
Yes, I'm aware. The point is that guns can't cause crime, because if they did, the amount of guns and the amount of homicide would correlate. It doesn't.
yea the Swiss and the Finnish are both in danger of a civil war as we speak
dey don't carry guns tho
why is it so hard for wh*Toids to grasp more guns = more violence
swiss and finns have guns at home they don't open carry them everywhere inb4 some buttblased wh*Toid cherrypicks a picture
>dey don't carry guns tho
Estonians, Czechians and Slovaks do though.
Absolument basé. So many replies ITT.
>the amount of guns and the amount of homicide would correlate
I think there might be other factors. The economy being primary among them. Also:
>homicide
90% of gunshot victims in the US survive. Firearm murders are just the tip of the gun crime iceberg.
MAGApedes btfo by one single Frenchman.
he's telling that girl that he is done with his shit and not going to speak to him again
no one talked about carrying them, you freak. And more guns =/= more violence, the UK barely has any guns in the hand of private owners, but they have a far higher (violent) crime rate than Finland, which almost has 7 times more guns than them?
Weapons are not the primary problem of places with high crime rates. Poverty, social injustice, culture and corruption.