I have a question

I have a question .
USA was leader of globalism.
But why USA is going to change to nationalism?
And also lots of countries are going to change nationalism too.

Why nationalism now?

Attached: A7DF1B71-D2E8-4A49-8339-FFB61519C154.jpg (232x300, 16K)

they have the gay, user

lol I dunno lol

do you love korean poo wine?

Attached: wonder.jpg (226x223, 11K)

Just CIA things

Civic-nationalism is not real nationalism. It's just globalism with a mask.

>But why USA is going to change to nationalism?
trump realised if he said he wasn't a globalist he'd gain the incel vote.

is term 'nationalism' correct when america has no only one specific ethnic group?

Civic nationalism is the original nationalism, because ethnic nationalism was made up later by autistic germoids larping as hyperborean space angel rapebabies

Nation and ethnicity are two different things

That's just wrong. By necessity, it would have HAD to have started as ethnic nationalism, because most people in nationalist countries were the same ethnicity.

CivNat is new because only recently have we had this strange desire to import thousands of outside peoples into our countries.

USA doesn't to be heading towards nationalism.
I think their WASP phase is dead

Short answer- retarded boomers

Its not

boomers are the least nationalist generation so far

for nationalism to work well they need to overlap tho

Ethnicity and nation have the same meaning. One greek, and one roman..
There's no "ethnic' nationalism, just nationalism. Civic nationalism is not nationalism

In modern English they most certainly do not have the same meaning, regardless of how similar their etymologies might be.

good thing pooland is a long destroyed nation and ethnicity, otherwise you'd understand

Attached: typical poland.jpg (348x347, 9K)

Imagine believing this.

Jewish influence. But it's just wrong

>why now
Because people don't like seeing their country turn to a global shopping mall for third worlders
I don't know when but you can only push so far until people sperg out

How so? It's entirely logical to have a term which doesn't refer to an ethnic group, but still refers to a coherent group with common culture, history, political structures, etc.

One of the best examples would be India. A huge number of ethnicities, but one nation (or at least, the Hindu parts).

Because it sucks to be American

kill yourself david

No!
I don’t die for nothing!

USA wasnt the leader of globalist elites you dumb gook

I’m nip not gook u fucking xxxx!!!
Fill this xxxx

poop

Bingo!!